You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be super useful with a test which would (for all materials most likely) compare cross section curves with a reference, and only fail if they changed by more than some low tolerance (e.g. 1e-7). However, it would hopefully be easy to maintain since it should report:
Any missing or new files.
The difference for each file, as well as the worst difference seen.
Also investigate per-component (e.g. inelastic, coh_elas, ...).
So when we would update something and expect small differences, it would be trivial to quickly look at the summary of changes, verify they are meaningful (possibly with a utility to show the plot differences), and ultimately run a script to update the values.
This would be both a great test, and easy to maintain with fewer false positives in failures.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be super useful with a test which would (for all materials most likely) compare cross section curves with a reference, and only fail if they changed by more than some low tolerance (e.g. 1e-7). However, it would hopefully be easy to maintain since it should report:
So when we would update something and expect small differences, it would be trivial to quickly look at the summary of changes, verify they are meaningful (possibly with a utility to show the plot differences), and ultimately run a script to update the values.
This would be both a great test, and easy to maintain with fewer false positives in failures.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: