data.csv

"";"study";"condition_arm1";"condition_arm2";"multi_arm1";"multi_arm2";".g";".g_se";"outcome_type";"outcome_domain";"gambling_outcome";"instrument";"mean_arm1";"sd_arm1";"n_arm1";"mean_arm2";"sd_arm2";"n_arm2";"baseline_m_arm1";"baseline_sd_arm1";"baseline_n_arm1";"baseline_m_arm2";"baseline_sd_arm2";"baseline_n_arm2";"year";"time_weeks";"time";"format";"format_details";"country";"mean_age";"percent_women";"sg";"ac";"ba";"itt";"rob";"rating";"event_arm1";"event_arm2";"totaln_arm1";"totaln_arm2";"full_ref";"doi";"abstract";"title";"url";"journal";"id_study";".id"
"1";"Abbott, 2018";"cbt";"cau";"wb + telephone";"cau";-806857980385137;162092424694805;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";2,7;3,27;73;3;4,06;78;8,3;6,32;116;9;7,14;116;2018;"36";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-freq_followup_36_NA_cbt_cau_wb+telephone_cau"
"2";"Abbott, 2018";"cbt";"cau";"wb + telephone";"cau";-229321034828201;146018833171357;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";3,1;4,04;87;3,2;4,59;100;8,3;6,32;116;9;7,14;116;2018;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-freq_post_12_NA_cbt_cau_wb+telephone_cau"
"3";"Abbott, 2018";"mi";"cau";"mi";"cau";0,110536759420332;0,166490947680119;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";3,5;4,97;66;3;4,06;78;8,2;6,78;112;9;7,14;116;2018;"36";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-freq_followup_36_NA_mi_cau_mi_cau"
"4";"Abbott, 2018";"mi";"cau";"mi";"cau";0,0223248850014689;0,145577439582261;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";3,3;4,31;88;3,2;4,59;100;8,2;6,78;112;9;7,14;116;2018;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-freq_post_12_NA_mi_cau_mi_cau"
"5";"Abbott, 2018";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";463828668315715;15936867586977;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";3,2;4,51;78;3;4,06;78;8,8;6,93;118;9;7,14;116;2018;"36";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-freq_followup_36_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"6";"Abbott, 2018";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";603237442429514;14162890578167;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";3,5;5,3;98;3,2;4,59;100;8,8;6,93;118;9;7,14;116;2018;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-freq_post_12_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"7";"Abbott, 2018";"cbt";"cau";"wb + telephone";"cau";-112157865592601;162154404180481;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";8;17,44;73;10;18,02;78;49;60,45;116;43;49,46;116;2018;"36";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-intensity_followup_36_NA_cbt_cau_wb+telephone_cau"
"8";"Abbott, 2018";"cbt";"cau";"wb + telephone";"cau";-491184397167087;146036106492246;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";9;16,66;87;10;22,96;100;49;60,45;116;43;49,46;116;2018;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_12_NA_cbt_cau_wb+telephone_cau"
"9";"Abbott, 2018";"mi";"cau";"mi";"cau";0,100256712252179;0,166468349751648;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";13;39,38;66;10;18,02;78;53;64,79;112;43;49,46;116;2018;"36";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-intensity_followup_36_NA_mi_cau_mi_cau"
"10";"Abbott, 2018";"mi";"cau";"mi";"cau";0;0,145572886837171;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";10;19,14;88;10;22,96;100;53;64,79;112;43;49,46;116;2018;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_12_NA_mi_cau_mi_cau"
"11";"Abbott, 2018";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";-112157865592601;162154404180481;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";7;13,52;78;10;18,02;78;49;72,05;118;43;49,46;116;2018;"36";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-intensity_followup_36_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"12";"Abbott, 2018";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";-460376518585977;141615358842742;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";9;20,2;98;10;22,96;100;49;72,05;118;43;49,46;116;2018;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"39.200000000000003";53;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Abbott, M., Hodgins, D. C., Bellringer, M., Vandal, A. C., Palmer Du Preez, K., Landon, J., ... & Feigin, V. (2018). Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Addiction, 113(5), 883-895.";"10.1111/add.14149";"Background and aims: Problem gambling is a significant public health issue world-wide. There is substantial investment in publicly funded intervention services, but limited evaluation of effectiveness. This study investigated three brief telephone interventions to determine whether they were more effective than standard helpline treatment in helping people to reduce gambling. Design: Randomized clinical trial. Setting: National gambling helpline in New Zealand. Participants: A total of 462 adults with problem gambling. INTERVENTIONS AND COMPARATOR: (1) Single motivational interview (MI), (2) single motivational interview plus cognitive-behavioural self-help workbook (MI + W) and (3) single motivational interview plus workbook plus four booster follow-up telephone interviews (MI + W + B). Comparator was helpline standard care [treatment as usual (TAU)]. Blinded follow-up was at 3, 6 and 12 months. Measurements: Primary outcomes were days gambled, dollars lost per day and treatment goal success. Findings: There were no differences across treatment arms, although participants showed large reductions in gambling during the 12-month follow-up period [mean reduction of 5.5 days, confidence interval (CI) = 4.8, 6.2; NZ$38 lost ($32, $44; 80.6%), improved (77.2%, 84.0%)]. Subgroup analysis revealed improved days gambled and dollars lost for MI + W + B over MI or MI + W for a goal of reduction of gambling (versus quitting) and improvement in dollars lost by ethnicity, gambling severity and psychological distress (all P < 0.01). MI + W + B was associated with greater treatment goal success for higher gambling severity than TAU or MI at 12 months and also better for those with higher psychological distress and lower self-efficacy to MI (all P < 0.01). TAU and MI were found to be equivalent in terms of dollars lost. Conclusions: In treatment of problem gambling in New Zealand, brief telephone interventions are associated with changes in days gambling and dollars lost similar to more intensive interventions, suggesting that more treatment is not necessarily better than less. Some client subgroups, in particular those with greater problem severity and greater distress, achieve better outcomes when they receive more intensive treatment.";"Brief telephone interventions for problem gambling: a randomized controlled trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/add.14149";"Addiction";"Abbott, 2018";"Abbott_2018_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_12_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"13";"Boudreault, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-928651059085842;282714832289681;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"dsm-5";2,74;2,08;27;4,7;2,08;27;5,71;2,06;31;5,26;2,06;31;2018;"11";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"51.5";39;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Boudreault, C., Giroux, I., Jacques, C., Goulet, A., Simoneau, H., & Ladouceur, R. (2018). Efficacy of a self-help treatment for at-risk and pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 561-580.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9717-z";"Available evidence suggests that self-help treatments may reduce problem gambling severity but inconsistencies of results across clinical trials leave the extent of their benefits unclear. Moreover, no self-help treatment has yet been validated within a French Canadian setting. The current study therefore assesses the efficacy of a French language self-help treatment including three motivational telephone interviews spread over an 11-week period and a cognitive-behavioral self-help workbook. At-risk and pathological gamblers were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 31) or the waiting list (n = 31). Relative to the waiting list, the treatment group showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of DSM-5 gambling disorder criteria met, gambling habits, and gambling consequences at Week 11. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction also significantly improved after 11 weeks for the treatment group, but not for the waiting list group. At Week 11, 13% of participants had dropped out of the study. All significant changes reported for the treatment group were maintained throughout 1, 6 and 12-month follow-ups. Results support the efficacy of the self-help treatment to reduce problem gambling severity, gambling behaviour and to improve overall functioning among a sample of French Canadian problem gamblers over short, medium and long term. Findings from this study lend support to the appropriateness of self-help treatments for problem gamblers and help clarify inconsistencies found in the literature. The low dropout rate is discussed with respect to the advantages of the self-help format. Clinical and methodological implications of the results are put forth.";"Efficacy of a Self-Help Treatment for At-Risk and Pathological Gamblers";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9717-z";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Boudreault, 2018";"Boudreault_2018_msd_dsm-5_post_11_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"14";"Boudreault, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-593641469121034;274236422317425;"msd";"gambling";"duration";"global - duration";8,44;10,81;27;24,92;37,15;27;36,19;33,18;31;30,86;35,69;31;2018;"11";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"51.5";39;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Boudreault, C., Giroux, I., Jacques, C., Goulet, A., Simoneau, H., & Ladouceur, R. (2018). Efficacy of a self-help treatment for at-risk and pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 561-580.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9717-z";"Available evidence suggests that self-help treatments may reduce problem gambling severity but inconsistencies of results across clinical trials leave the extent of their benefits unclear. Moreover, no self-help treatment has yet been validated within a French Canadian setting. The current study therefore assesses the efficacy of a French language self-help treatment including three motivational telephone interviews spread over an 11-week period and a cognitive-behavioral self-help workbook. At-risk and pathological gamblers were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 31) or the waiting list (n = 31). Relative to the waiting list, the treatment group showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of DSM-5 gambling disorder criteria met, gambling habits, and gambling consequences at Week 11. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction also significantly improved after 11 weeks for the treatment group, but not for the waiting list group. At Week 11, 13% of participants had dropped out of the study. All significant changes reported for the treatment group were maintained throughout 1, 6 and 12-month follow-ups. Results support the efficacy of the self-help treatment to reduce problem gambling severity, gambling behaviour and to improve overall functioning among a sample of French Canadian problem gamblers over short, medium and long term. Findings from this study lend support to the appropriateness of self-help treatments for problem gamblers and help clarify inconsistencies found in the literature. The low dropout rate is discussed with respect to the advantages of the self-help format. Clinical and methodological implications of the results are put forth.";"Efficacy of a Self-Help Treatment for At-Risk and Pathological Gamblers";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9717-z";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Boudreault, 2018";"Boudreault_2018_msd_global-duration_post_11_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"15";"Boudreault, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-753874363099902;277857591033091;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";3,48;4,26;27;9,27;9,82;27;9,77;6,29;31;9,96;8,96;31;2018;"11";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"51.5";39;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Boudreault, C., Giroux, I., Jacques, C., Goulet, A., Simoneau, H., & Ladouceur, R. (2018). Efficacy of a self-help treatment for at-risk and pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 561-580.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9717-z";"Available evidence suggests that self-help treatments may reduce problem gambling severity but inconsistencies of results across clinical trials leave the extent of their benefits unclear. Moreover, no self-help treatment has yet been validated within a French Canadian setting. The current study therefore assesses the efficacy of a French language self-help treatment including three motivational telephone interviews spread over an 11-week period and a cognitive-behavioral self-help workbook. At-risk and pathological gamblers were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 31) or the waiting list (n = 31). Relative to the waiting list, the treatment group showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of DSM-5 gambling disorder criteria met, gambling habits, and gambling consequences at Week 11. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction also significantly improved after 11 weeks for the treatment group, but not for the waiting list group. At Week 11, 13% of participants had dropped out of the study. All significant changes reported for the treatment group were maintained throughout 1, 6 and 12-month follow-ups. Results support the efficacy of the self-help treatment to reduce problem gambling severity, gambling behaviour and to improve overall functioning among a sample of French Canadian problem gamblers over short, medium and long term. Findings from this study lend support to the appropriateness of self-help treatments for problem gamblers and help clarify inconsistencies found in the literature. The low dropout rate is discussed with respect to the advantages of the self-help format. Clinical and methodological implications of the results are put forth.";"Efficacy of a Self-Help Treatment for At-Risk and Pathological Gamblers";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9717-z";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Boudreault, 2018";"Boudreault_2018_msd_global-freq_post_11_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"16";"Boudreault, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-382817900390095;27073880070112;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";476,56;2035,59;27;1267,28;2035,59;27;1612,58;1383,2;31;1181,9;1383,2;31;2018;"11";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"51.5";39;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Boudreault, C., Giroux, I., Jacques, C., Goulet, A., Simoneau, H., & Ladouceur, R. (2018). Efficacy of a self-help treatment for at-risk and pathological gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 561-580.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9717-z";"Available evidence suggests that self-help treatments may reduce problem gambling severity but inconsistencies of results across clinical trials leave the extent of their benefits unclear. Moreover, no self-help treatment has yet been validated within a French Canadian setting. The current study therefore assesses the efficacy of a French language self-help treatment including three motivational telephone interviews spread over an 11-week period and a cognitive-behavioral self-help workbook. At-risk and pathological gamblers were randomly assigned to the treatment group (n = 31) or the waiting list (n = 31). Relative to the waiting list, the treatment group showed a statistically significant reduction in the number of DSM-5 gambling disorder criteria met, gambling habits, and gambling consequences at Week 11. Perceived self-efficacy and life satisfaction also significantly improved after 11 weeks for the treatment group, but not for the waiting list group. At Week 11, 13% of participants had dropped out of the study. All significant changes reported for the treatment group were maintained throughout 1, 6 and 12-month follow-ups. Results support the efficacy of the self-help treatment to reduce problem gambling severity, gambling behaviour and to improve overall functioning among a sample of French Canadian problem gamblers over short, medium and long term. Findings from this study lend support to the appropriateness of self-help treatments for problem gamblers and help clarify inconsistencies found in the literature. The low dropout rate is discussed with respect to the advantages of the self-help format. Clinical and methodological implications of the results are put forth.";"Efficacy of a Self-Help Treatment for At-Risk and Pathological Gamblers";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9717-z";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Boudreault, 2018";"Boudreault_2018_msd_global-intensity_post_11_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"17";"Bücker, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-0,335118431668892;0,261343921105702;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"gad-7";5,65;4,2;23;7,23;4,9;39;8,76;5,31;71;8,94;4,95;69;2018;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"35.700000000000003";24;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Bücker, L., Bierbrodt, J., Hand, I., Wittekind, C., & Moritz, S. (2018). Effects of a depression-focused internet intervention in slot machine gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. PloS one, 13(6), e0198859.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0198859";"Background: Problematic and pathological gambling have been linked to depression. Despite a high demand for treatment and negative financial consequences, only a small fraction of problematic and pathological gamblers seek professional help. The existing treatment gap could be narrowed by providing low-threshold, anonymous internet-based interventions. The aim of the present study was to examine the acceptance and efficacy of an online-intervention for depression (“Deprexis”) in a sample of problematic and pathological slot-machine gamblers. We hypothesized that the intervention group would show a greater reduction in both depressive and gambling-related symptoms compared to a wait-list control group. Method: A total of 140 individuals with self-reported gambling and mood problems were randomly allocated either to the intervention group or to a wait-list control group. After 8 weeks, all participants were invited for re-assessment. The Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) served as the primary outcome assessment. Problematic gambling was measured with the Pathological Gambling Adaptation of Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS) and the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). The trial is registered with the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00013888). Results: ITT analyses showed that the intervention led to a significant reduction in depressive symptoms as well as gambling-related symptoms compared to the control group, with moderate to strong effect sizes. PP analyses failed to yield significant results due to high rates of non-completion and limited statistical power. Moderator analyses indicated that Deprexis was particularly beneficial in reducing problematic gambling for those scoring high on baseline gambling-related symptoms and for those who gamble due to loneliness. Discussion: Results of the present study suggest that Deprexis might be a useful adjunct to traditional interventions for the treatment of problematic gambling. The potential of internet-based interventions that are more targeted at issues specific to gambling should be evaluated in future studies.";"Effects of a depression-focused internet intervention in slot machine gamblers: a randomized controlled trial";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198859";"PLOS ONE";"Bücker, 2018";"Bücker_2018_msd_gad-7_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"18";"Bücker, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-0,505586720147564;0,263545820840198;"msd";"depression";"NA";"phq-9";5,74;4,52;23;8,26;5,14;39;10,8;5,81;71;11,02;5,37;69;2018;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"35.700000000000003";24;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Bücker, L., Bierbrodt, J., Hand, I., Wittekind, C., & Moritz, S. (2018). Effects of a depression-focused internet intervention in slot machine gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. PloS one, 13(6), e0198859.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0198859";"Background: Problematic and pathological gambling have been linked to depression. Despite a high demand for treatment and negative financial consequences, only a small fraction of problematic and pathological gamblers seek professional help. The existing treatment gap could be narrowed by providing low-threshold, anonymous internet-based interventions. The aim of the present study was to examine the acceptance and efficacy of an online-intervention for depression (“Deprexis”) in a sample of problematic and pathological slot-machine gamblers. We hypothesized that the intervention group would show a greater reduction in both depressive and gambling-related symptoms compared to a wait-list control group. Method: A total of 140 individuals with self-reported gambling and mood problems were randomly allocated either to the intervention group or to a wait-list control group. After 8 weeks, all participants were invited for re-assessment. The Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) served as the primary outcome assessment. Problematic gambling was measured with the Pathological Gambling Adaptation of Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS) and the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). The trial is registered with the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00013888). Results: ITT analyses showed that the intervention led to a significant reduction in depressive symptoms as well as gambling-related symptoms compared to the control group, with moderate to strong effect sizes. PP analyses failed to yield significant results due to high rates of non-completion and limited statistical power. Moderator analyses indicated that Deprexis was particularly beneficial in reducing problematic gambling for those scoring high on baseline gambling-related symptoms and for those who gamble due to loneliness. Discussion: Results of the present study suggest that Deprexis might be a useful adjunct to traditional interventions for the treatment of problematic gambling. The potential of internet-based interventions that are more targeted at issues specific to gambling should be evaluated in future studies.";"Effects of a depression-focused internet intervention in slot machine gamblers: a randomized controlled trial";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198859";"PLOS ONE";"Bücker, 2018";"Bücker_2018_msd_phq-9_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"19";"Bücker, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-0,293561488202309;0,260940513187167;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";5,35;3,77;23;6,53;4,08;39;9,75;3,14;71;9,71;3,24;69;2018;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"35.700000000000003";24;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Bücker, L., Bierbrodt, J., Hand, I., Wittekind, C., & Moritz, S. (2018). Effects of a depression-focused internet intervention in slot machine gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. PloS one, 13(6), e0198859.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0198859";"Background: Problematic and pathological gambling have been linked to depression. Despite a high demand for treatment and negative financial consequences, only a small fraction of problematic and pathological gamblers seek professional help. The existing treatment gap could be narrowed by providing low-threshold, anonymous internet-based interventions. The aim of the present study was to examine the acceptance and efficacy of an online-intervention for depression (“Deprexis”) in a sample of problematic and pathological slot-machine gamblers. We hypothesized that the intervention group would show a greater reduction in both depressive and gambling-related symptoms compared to a wait-list control group. Method: A total of 140 individuals with self-reported gambling and mood problems were randomly allocated either to the intervention group or to a wait-list control group. After 8 weeks, all participants were invited for re-assessment. The Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) served as the primary outcome assessment. Problematic gambling was measured with the Pathological Gambling Adaptation of Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS) and the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). The trial is registered with the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00013888). Results: ITT analyses showed that the intervention led to a significant reduction in depressive symptoms as well as gambling-related symptoms compared to the control group, with moderate to strong effect sizes. PP analyses failed to yield significant results due to high rates of non-completion and limited statistical power. Moderator analyses indicated that Deprexis was particularly beneficial in reducing problematic gambling for those scoring high on baseline gambling-related symptoms and for those who gamble due to loneliness. Discussion: Results of the present study suggest that Deprexis might be a useful adjunct to traditional interventions for the treatment of problematic gambling. The potential of internet-based interventions that are more targeted at issues specific to gambling should be evaluated in future studies.";"Effects of a depression-focused internet intervention in slot machine gamblers: a randomized controlled trial";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198859";"PLOS ONE";"Bücker, 2018";"Bücker_2018_msd_sogs_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"20";"Bücker, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-0,268454463962313;0,260722374719477;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"ybocs";11,22;7,67;23;13,51;8,83;39;17,92;6,7;71;17,68;6,91;69;2018;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"35.700000000000003";24;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Bücker, L., Bierbrodt, J., Hand, I., Wittekind, C., & Moritz, S. (2018). Effects of a depression-focused internet intervention in slot machine gamblers: a randomized controlled trial. PloS one, 13(6), e0198859.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0198859";"Background: Problematic and pathological gambling have been linked to depression. Despite a high demand for treatment and negative financial consequences, only a small fraction of problematic and pathological gamblers seek professional help. The existing treatment gap could be narrowed by providing low-threshold, anonymous internet-based interventions. The aim of the present study was to examine the acceptance and efficacy of an online-intervention for depression (“Deprexis”) in a sample of problematic and pathological slot-machine gamblers. We hypothesized that the intervention group would show a greater reduction in both depressive and gambling-related symptoms compared to a wait-list control group. Method: A total of 140 individuals with self-reported gambling and mood problems were randomly allocated either to the intervention group or to a wait-list control group. After 8 weeks, all participants were invited for re-assessment. The Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) served as the primary outcome assessment. Problematic gambling was measured with the Pathological Gambling Adaptation of Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (PG-YBOCS) and the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). The trial is registered with the German Registry for Clinical Studies (DRKS00013888). Results: ITT analyses showed that the intervention led to a significant reduction in depressive symptoms as well as gambling-related symptoms compared to the control group, with moderate to strong effect sizes. PP analyses failed to yield significant results due to high rates of non-completion and limited statistical power. Moderator analyses indicated that Deprexis was particularly beneficial in reducing problematic gambling for those scoring high on baseline gambling-related symptoms and for those who gamble due to loneliness. Discussion: Results of the present study suggest that Deprexis might be a useful adjunct to traditional interventions for the treatment of problematic gambling. The potential of internet-based interventions that are more targeted at issues specific to gambling should be evaluated in future studies.";"Effects of a depression-focused internet intervention in slot machine gamblers: a randomized controlled trial";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198859";"PLOS ONE";"Bücker, 2018";"Bücker_2018_msd_ybocs_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"21";"Bücker, 2021";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-0,160194868608198;0,245767904574192;"msd";"depression";"NA";"phq-9";9,68;5,19;31;10,53;5,29;34;10,8;4,34;77;11,35;5,02;73;2021;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"35";33;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Bücker, L., Gehlenborg, J., Moritz, S., & Westermann, S. (2021). A randomized controlled trial on a self-guided Internet-based intervention for gambling problems. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 13033.";"10.1038/s41598-021-92242-8";"The majority of individuals with problematic and pathological gambling remain untreated, and treatment barriers are high. Internet-based interventions can help to address existing barriers, and first studies suggest their potential for this target group. Within a randomized controlled trial (N = 150) with two assessment times (baseline and post-intervention), we aimed to investigate the feasibility, acceptance, and effectiveness of a self-guided Internet-based intervention targeted at gambling problems. We expected a significant reduction in gambling symptoms (primary outcome) and depressive symptoms as well gambling-specific dysfunctional thoughts (secondary outcomes) in the intervention group (IG) compared to a wait-list control group with access to treatment-as-usual (control group, CG) after the intervention period of 8 weeks. Results of the complete cases, per protocol, intention-to-treat (ITT), and frequent user analyses showed significant improvements in both groups for primary and secondary outcomes but no significant between-group differences (ITT primary outcome, F(1,147) = .11, p = .739, ηp2 < .001). Moderation analyses indicated that individuals in the IG with higher gambling and depressive symptoms, older age, and comorbid anxiety symptoms showed significant improvement relative to the CG. The intervention was positively evaluated (e.g., 96.5% rated the program as useful). Possible reasons for the nonsignificant between-group differences are discussed. Future studies should include follow-up assessments and larger samples to address limitations of the present study.";"A randomized controlled trial on a self-guided Internet-based intervention for gambling problems";"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-92242-8";"Scientific Reports";"Bücker, 2021";"Bücker_2021_msd_phq-9_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"22";"Bücker, 2021";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";0,0413629583261145;0,245392788400018;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";6,74;3,88;31;6,59;3,29;34;10,18;2,85;77;10,49;3;73;2021;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"35";33;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Bücker, L., Gehlenborg, J., Moritz, S., & Westermann, S. (2021). A randomized controlled trial on a self-guided Internet-based intervention for gambling problems. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 13033.";"10.1038/s41598-021-92242-8";"The majority of individuals with problematic and pathological gambling remain untreated, and treatment barriers are high. Internet-based interventions can help to address existing barriers, and first studies suggest their potential for this target group. Within a randomized controlled trial (N = 150) with two assessment times (baseline and post-intervention), we aimed to investigate the feasibility, acceptance, and effectiveness of a self-guided Internet-based intervention targeted at gambling problems. We expected a significant reduction in gambling symptoms (primary outcome) and depressive symptoms as well gambling-specific dysfunctional thoughts (secondary outcomes) in the intervention group (IG) compared to a wait-list control group with access to treatment-as-usual (control group, CG) after the intervention period of 8 weeks. Results of the complete cases, per protocol, intention-to-treat (ITT), and frequent user analyses showed significant improvements in both groups for primary and secondary outcomes but no significant between-group differences (ITT primary outcome, F(1,147) = .11, p = .739, ηp2 < .001). Moderation analyses indicated that individuals in the IG with higher gambling and depressive symptoms, older age, and comorbid anxiety symptoms showed significant improvement relative to the CG. The intervention was positively evaluated (e.g., 96.5% rated the program as useful). Possible reasons for the nonsignificant between-group differences are discussed. Future studies should include follow-up assessments and larger samples to address limitations of the present study.";"A randomized controlled trial on a self-guided Internet-based intervention for gambling problems";"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-92242-8";"Scientific Reports";"Bücker, 2021";"Bücker_2021_msd_sogs_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"23";"Bücker, 2021";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-0,146890748809566;0,245703960013171;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"ybocs";13,29;5,72;31;14,33;7,98;34;18,69;5,94;77;19,77;6,47;73;2021;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"35";33;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Bücker, L., Gehlenborg, J., Moritz, S., & Westermann, S. (2021). A randomized controlled trial on a self-guided Internet-based intervention for gambling problems. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 13033.";"10.1038/s41598-021-92242-8";"The majority of individuals with problematic and pathological gambling remain untreated, and treatment barriers are high. Internet-based interventions can help to address existing barriers, and first studies suggest their potential for this target group. Within a randomized controlled trial (N = 150) with two assessment times (baseline and post-intervention), we aimed to investigate the feasibility, acceptance, and effectiveness of a self-guided Internet-based intervention targeted at gambling problems. We expected a significant reduction in gambling symptoms (primary outcome) and depressive symptoms as well gambling-specific dysfunctional thoughts (secondary outcomes) in the intervention group (IG) compared to a wait-list control group with access to treatment-as-usual (control group, CG) after the intervention period of 8 weeks. Results of the complete cases, per protocol, intention-to-treat (ITT), and frequent user analyses showed significant improvements in both groups for primary and secondary outcomes but no significant between-group differences (ITT primary outcome, F(1,147) = .11, p = .739, ηp2 < .001). Moderation analyses indicated that individuals in the IG with higher gambling and depressive symptoms, older age, and comorbid anxiety symptoms showed significant improvement relative to the CG. The intervention was positively evaluated (e.g., 96.5% rated the program as useful). Possible reasons for the nonsignificant between-group differences are discussed. Future studies should include follow-up assessments and larger samples to address limitations of the present study.";"A randomized controlled trial on a self-guided Internet-based intervention for gambling problems";"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-92242-8";"Scientific Reports";"Bücker, 2021";"Bücker_2021_msd_ybocs_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"24";"Carlbring, 2008";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-51595896540517;247506758016158;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"hads-a";5,12;3,57;34;7,03;3,75;32;8,97;3,33;34;8,72;3,3;32;2008;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"31.9";6;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., & Smit, F. (2008). Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(6), 1090-1094.";"10.1037/a0013603";"Although effective therapies for pathological gambling exist, their uptake is limited to 10% of the target population. To lower the barriers for help seeking, the authors tested an online alternative in a randomized trial (N = 66). The participants were pathological gamblers not presenting with severe comorbid depression. A wait-list control was compared with an 8-week Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy program with minimal therapist contact via e-mail and weekly telephone calls of less than 15 min. Average time spent on each participant, including phone conversations, e-mail, and administration, was 4 hr. The Internet-based intervention resulted in favorable changes in pathological gambling, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Composite between-group effect size (Cohen's d) at posttreatment was 0.83. Follow-ups carried out in the treatment group at 6, 18, and 36 months indicated that treatment effects were sustained (ds = 2.58, 1.96, and 1.98). This evidence is in support of Internet-delivered treatment for pathological gamblers. However, it is not clear how effective the treatment is for more severely depressed individuals.";"Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-16943-010";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Carlbring, 2008";"Carlbring_2008_msd_hads-a_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"25";"Carlbring, 2008";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-677922335663661;250448561433977;"msd";"depression";"NA";"hads-d";4,03;3,42;34;6,16;2,73;32;6,97;3,49;34;6,34;3,39;32;2008;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"31.9";6;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., & Smit, F. (2008). Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(6), 1090-1094.";"10.1037/a0013603";"Although effective therapies for pathological gambling exist, their uptake is limited to 10% of the target population. To lower the barriers for help seeking, the authors tested an online alternative in a randomized trial (N = 66). The participants were pathological gamblers not presenting with severe comorbid depression. A wait-list control was compared with an 8-week Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy program with minimal therapist contact via e-mail and weekly telephone calls of less than 15 min. Average time spent on each participant, including phone conversations, e-mail, and administration, was 4 hr. The Internet-based intervention resulted in favorable changes in pathological gambling, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Composite between-group effect size (Cohen's d) at posttreatment was 0.83. Follow-ups carried out in the treatment group at 6, 18, and 36 months indicated that treatment effects were sustained (ds = 2.58, 1.96, and 1.98). This evidence is in support of Internet-delivered treatment for pathological gamblers. However, it is not clear how effective the treatment is for more severely depressed individuals.";"Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-16943-010";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Carlbring, 2008";"Carlbring_2008_msd_hads-d_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"26";"Carlbring, 2008";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-134433394333413;270062936997221;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"nods";1,97;2,94;34;5,84;2,74;32;8,21;1,32;34;7,84;1,39;32;2008;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"31.9";6;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., & Smit, F. (2008). Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(6), 1090-1094.";"10.1037/a0013603";"Although effective therapies for pathological gambling exist, their uptake is limited to 10% of the target population. To lower the barriers for help seeking, the authors tested an online alternative in a randomized trial (N = 66). The participants were pathological gamblers not presenting with severe comorbid depression. A wait-list control was compared with an 8-week Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy program with minimal therapist contact via e-mail and weekly telephone calls of less than 15 min. Average time spent on each participant, including phone conversations, e-mail, and administration, was 4 hr. The Internet-based intervention resulted in favorable changes in pathological gambling, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Composite between-group effect size (Cohen's d) at posttreatment was 0.83. Follow-ups carried out in the treatment group at 6, 18, and 36 months indicated that treatment effects were sustained (ds = 2.58, 1.96, and 1.98). This evidence is in support of Internet-delivered treatment for pathological gamblers. However, it is not clear how effective the treatment is for more severely depressed individuals.";"Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-16943-010";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Carlbring, 2008";"Carlbring_2008_msd_nods_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"27";"Carlbring, 2008";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";716870807000005;25126885086453;"msd";"qol";"NA";"qoli";2,58;1,29;34;1,47;1,75;32;1,55;1,26;34;1,51;1,59;32;2008;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"31.9";6;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., & Smit, F. (2008). Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(6), 1090-1094.";"10.1037/a0013603";"Although effective therapies for pathological gambling exist, their uptake is limited to 10% of the target population. To lower the barriers for help seeking, the authors tested an online alternative in a randomized trial (N = 66). The participants were pathological gamblers not presenting with severe comorbid depression. A wait-list control was compared with an 8-week Internet-based cognitive behavior therapy program with minimal therapist contact via e-mail and weekly telephone calls of less than 15 min. Average time spent on each participant, including phone conversations, e-mail, and administration, was 4 hr. The Internet-based intervention resulted in favorable changes in pathological gambling, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. Composite between-group effect size (Cohen's d) at posttreatment was 0.83. Follow-ups carried out in the treatment group at 6, 18, and 36 months indicated that treatment effects were sustained (ds = 2.58, 1.96, and 1.98). This evidence is in support of Internet-delivered treatment for pathological gamblers. However, it is not clear how effective the treatment is for more severely depressed individuals.";"Randomized trial of internet-delivered self-help with telephone support for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-16943-010";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Carlbring, 2008";"Carlbring_2008_msd_qoli_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"28";"Carlbring, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"cbt";"wl";334373578286918;270877685130646;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"bai";10,72;12,99;29;7,12;6,86;25;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_bai_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_cbt_wl"
"29";"Carlbring, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"cbt";"wl";500972914998677;273245886490903;"msd";"depression";"NA";"bdi2";15,21;12,84;29;9,76;7,53;25;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_bdi2_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_cbt_wl"
"30";"Carlbring, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"cbt";"wl";-241797059028672;44186143389828;"msd";"su";"NA";"dgd";0,57;1,51;7;1;1,79;15;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_dgd_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_cbt_wl"
"31";"Carlbring, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"cbt";"wl";153596025670556;412050712262103;"msd";"su";"NA";"igd";2,12;4,91;8;1,56;2,77;18;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_igd_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_cbt_wl"
"32";"Carlbring, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"cbt";"wl";44298500494536;270271735080081;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"nods";2,07;2,68;30;1;1,96;25;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_nods_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_cbt_wl"
"33";"Carlbring, 2010";"mi";"wl";"mi";"wl";0,77214024201561;0,279033793520758;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"nods";3,1;3,17;29;1;1,96;25;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_nods_post_12_NA_mi_wl_mi_wl"
"34";"Carlbring, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"cbt";"wl";962549160441892;637987325120848;"msd";"gambling";"duration";"tlfb - duration";1468,8;1155,64;5;434;591,7;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_tlfb-duration_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_cbt_wl"
"35";"Carlbring, 2010";"mi";"wl";"mi";"wl";0,484372957244491;0,561359348271112;"msd";"gambling";"duration";"tlfb - duration";2423,7;4427,34;10;434;591,7;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_tlfb-duration_post_12_NA_mi_wl_mi_wl"
"36";"Carlbring, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"cbt";"wl";0;565266863719195;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";10;10,14;8;10;14,1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_tlfb-freq_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_cbt_wl"
"37";"Carlbring, 2010";"mi";"wl";"mi";"wl";0,226220734059249;0,551078593263153;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";12,55;9,31;11;10;14,1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_tlfb-freq_post_12_NA_mi_wl_mi_wl"
"38";"Carlbring, 2010";"mi";"wl";"mi";"wl";0,0705085262932359;0,549679425069698;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";6439,91;7116,53;11;5841,25;10387,68;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_12_NA_mi_wl_mi_wl"
"39";"Carlbring, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"cbt";"wl";-438165855030177;572299032039806;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";93;8235,86;8;19349,17;36547,06;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2010;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"40.5";16;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Carlbring, P., Jonsson, J., Josephson, H., & Forsberg, L. (2010). Motivational interviewing versus cognitive behavioral group therapy in the treatment of problem and pathological gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(2), 92-103.";"10.1080/16506070903190245";"Pathological gambling is a widespread problem with major implications for society and the individual. There are effective treatments, but little is known about the relative effectiveness of different treatments. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing, cognitive behavioral group therapy, and a no-treatment control (wait-list) in the treatment of pathological gambling. This was done in a randomized controlled trial at an outpatient dependency clinic at Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). A total of 150 primarily self-recruited patients with current gambling problems or pathological gambling according to an NORC DSM-IV screen for gambling problems were randomized to four individual sessions of motivational interviewing (MI), eight sessions of cognitive behavioral group therapy (CBGT), or a no-treatment wait-list control. Gambling-related measures derived from timeline follow-back as well as general levels of anxiety and depression were administered at baseline, termination, and 6 and 12 months posttermination. Treatment showed superiority in some areas over the no-treatment control in the short term, including the primary outcome measure. No differences were found between MI and CBGT at any point in time. Instead, both MI and CBGT produced significant within-group decreases on most outcome measures up to the 12-month follow-up. Both forms of intervention are promising treatments, but there is room for improvement in terms of both outcome and compliance.";"Motivational Interviewing Versus Cognitive Behavioral Group Therapy in the Treatment of Problem and Pathological Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/16506070903190245";"Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ";"Carlbring, 2010";"Carlbring_2010_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_cbt_wl"
"40";"Casey, 2017";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-522345259704073;25287599918255;"msd";"su";"NA";"audit";4,17;3,87;27;6,66;5,22;38;6,98;6,28;60;6,76;5,06;55;2017;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"44.5";58;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Casey, L. M., Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., Horrigan, K., Day, J., Ireland, M., & Clough, B. A. (2017). Internet-based delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy compared to monitoring, feedback and support for problem gambling: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of gambling studies, 33(3), 993-1010.";"10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (I-CBT) for the treatment of problem gambling, when compared to a waitlist control and an active comparison condition consisting of monitoring, feedback, and support (I-MFS). Participants (N = 174) were randomly allocated to the three conditions. Variables of interest were gambling outcome and related mental health measures. Participants in the active conditions (I-CBT and I-MFS) completed six online modules. Both I-CBT and I-MFS conditions resulted in significant treatment gains on gambling severity. However, I-CBT was also associated with reductions in a range of other gambling-related and mental health outcomes. Compared with I-MFS, I-CBT produced greater effects across seven outcomes measures, relating to gambling urges, cognitions, stress, and life satisfaction. I-CBT participants also rated the program as significantly more satisfactory. Treatment gains observed for both active conditions were found to be stable through to 12 month follow up. The results indicate that the benefits of I-CBT were more than simply the non-specific effects of engaging in online treatment or receiving motivation, feedback, and support. Online treatments for gambling may be a valuable tool in increasing help-seeking and treatment engagement in this population, and be integrated as part of stepped care approaches to treatment.";"Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Casey, 2017";"Casey_2017_msd_audit_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"41";"Casey, 2017";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-53064708073033;254958315228513;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"dass-a";4,67;6,48;24;8,86;8,43;44;13,07;8,79;60;9,09;8,49;55;2017;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"44.5";58;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Casey, L. M., Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., Horrigan, K., Day, J., Ireland, M., & Clough, B. A. (2017). Internet-based delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy compared to monitoring, feedback and support for problem gambling: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of gambling studies, 33(3), 993-1010.";"10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (I-CBT) for the treatment of problem gambling, when compared to a waitlist control and an active comparison condition consisting of monitoring, feedback, and support (I-MFS). Participants (N = 174) were randomly allocated to the three conditions. Variables of interest were gambling outcome and related mental health measures. Participants in the active conditions (I-CBT and I-MFS) completed six online modules. Both I-CBT and I-MFS conditions resulted in significant treatment gains on gambling severity. However, I-CBT was also associated with reductions in a range of other gambling-related and mental health outcomes. Compared with I-MFS, I-CBT produced greater effects across seven outcomes measures, relating to gambling urges, cognitions, stress, and life satisfaction. I-CBT participants also rated the program as significantly more satisfactory. Treatment gains observed for both active conditions were found to be stable through to 12 month follow up. The results indicate that the benefits of I-CBT were more than simply the non-specific effects of engaging in online treatment or receiving motivation, feedback, and support. Online treatments for gambling may be a valuable tool in increasing help-seeking and treatment engagement in this population, and be integrated as part of stepped care approaches to treatment.";"Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Casey, 2017";"Casey_2017_msd_dass-a_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"42";"Casey, 2017";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-396514293296552;251870856657146;"msd";"depression";"NA";"dass-d";8,25;10,78;24;8,58;6,41;43;23,07;10,3;60;17,35;12,55;55;2017;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"44.5";58;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Casey, L. M., Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., Horrigan, K., Day, J., Ireland, M., & Clough, B. A. (2017). Internet-based delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy compared to monitoring, feedback and support for problem gambling: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of gambling studies, 33(3), 993-1010.";"10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (I-CBT) for the treatment of problem gambling, when compared to a waitlist control and an active comparison condition consisting of monitoring, feedback, and support (I-MFS). Participants (N = 174) were randomly allocated to the three conditions. Variables of interest were gambling outcome and related mental health measures. Participants in the active conditions (I-CBT and I-MFS) completed six online modules. Both I-CBT and I-MFS conditions resulted in significant treatment gains on gambling severity. However, I-CBT was also associated with reductions in a range of other gambling-related and mental health outcomes. Compared with I-MFS, I-CBT produced greater effects across seven outcomes measures, relating to gambling urges, cognitions, stress, and life satisfaction. I-CBT participants also rated the program as significantly more satisfactory. Treatment gains observed for both active conditions were found to be stable through to 12 month follow up. The results indicate that the benefits of I-CBT were more than simply the non-specific effects of engaging in online treatment or receiving motivation, feedback, and support. Online treatments for gambling may be a valuable tool in increasing help-seeking and treatment engagement in this population, and be integrated as part of stepped care approaches to treatment.";"Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Casey, 2017";"Casey_2017_msd_dass-d_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"43";"Casey, 2017";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-693763906713955;257822200113952;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";1,58;1,38;24;2,91;2,12;44;4,82;2,1;60;3,15;2,09;55;2017;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"44.5";58;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Casey, L. M., Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., Horrigan, K., Day, J., Ireland, M., & Clough, B. A. (2017). Internet-based delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy compared to monitoring, feedback and support for problem gambling: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of gambling studies, 33(3), 993-1010.";"10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (I-CBT) for the treatment of problem gambling, when compared to a waitlist control and an active comparison condition consisting of monitoring, feedback, and support (I-MFS). Participants (N = 174) were randomly allocated to the three conditions. Variables of interest were gambling outcome and related mental health measures. Participants in the active conditions (I-CBT and I-MFS) completed six online modules. Both I-CBT and I-MFS conditions resulted in significant treatment gains on gambling severity. However, I-CBT was also associated with reductions in a range of other gambling-related and mental health outcomes. Compared with I-MFS, I-CBT produced greater effects across seven outcomes measures, relating to gambling urges, cognitions, stress, and life satisfaction. I-CBT participants also rated the program as significantly more satisfactory. Treatment gains observed for both active conditions were found to be stable through to 12 month follow up. The results indicate that the benefits of I-CBT were more than simply the non-specific effects of engaging in online treatment or receiving motivation, feedback, and support. Online treatments for gambling may be a valuable tool in increasing help-seeking and treatment engagement in this population, and be integrated as part of stepped care approaches to treatment.";"Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Casey, 2017";"Casey_2017_msd_global-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"44";"Casey, 2017";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-398796148514238;253185020470792;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";96,33;189,1;24;251;454,44;44;565,88;1372,55;60;268,91;453,73;55;2017;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"44.5";58;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Casey, L. M., Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., Horrigan, K., Day, J., Ireland, M., & Clough, B. A. (2017). Internet-based delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy compared to monitoring, feedback and support for problem gambling: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of gambling studies, 33(3), 993-1010.";"10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (I-CBT) for the treatment of problem gambling, when compared to a waitlist control and an active comparison condition consisting of monitoring, feedback, and support (I-MFS). Participants (N = 174) were randomly allocated to the three conditions. Variables of interest were gambling outcome and related mental health measures. Participants in the active conditions (I-CBT and I-MFS) completed six online modules. Both I-CBT and I-MFS conditions resulted in significant treatment gains on gambling severity. However, I-CBT was also associated with reductions in a range of other gambling-related and mental health outcomes. Compared with I-MFS, I-CBT produced greater effects across seven outcomes measures, relating to gambling urges, cognitions, stress, and life satisfaction. I-CBT participants also rated the program as significantly more satisfactory. Treatment gains observed for both active conditions were found to be stable through to 12 month follow up. The results indicate that the benefits of I-CBT were more than simply the non-specific effects of engaging in online treatment or receiving motivation, feedback, and support. Online treatments for gambling may be a valuable tool in increasing help-seeking and treatment engagement in this population, and be integrated as part of stepped care approaches to treatment.";"Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Casey, 2017";"Casey_2017_msd_global-intensity_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"45";"Casey, 2017";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-123407304203857;280700179400134;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gsas";14;11,05;22;27,16;10,27;43;31,46;7,36;60;31,76;6,29;55;2017;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"44.5";58;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Casey, L. M., Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., Horrigan, K., Day, J., Ireland, M., & Clough, B. A. (2017). Internet-based delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy compared to monitoring, feedback and support for problem gambling: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of gambling studies, 33(3), 993-1010.";"10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (I-CBT) for the treatment of problem gambling, when compared to a waitlist control and an active comparison condition consisting of monitoring, feedback, and support (I-MFS). Participants (N = 174) were randomly allocated to the three conditions. Variables of interest were gambling outcome and related mental health measures. Participants in the active conditions (I-CBT and I-MFS) completed six online modules. Both I-CBT and I-MFS conditions resulted in significant treatment gains on gambling severity. However, I-CBT was also associated with reductions in a range of other gambling-related and mental health outcomes. Compared with I-MFS, I-CBT produced greater effects across seven outcomes measures, relating to gambling urges, cognitions, stress, and life satisfaction. I-CBT participants also rated the program as significantly more satisfactory. Treatment gains observed for both active conditions were found to be stable through to 12 month follow up. The results indicate that the benefits of I-CBT were more than simply the non-specific effects of engaging in online treatment or receiving motivation, feedback, and support. Online treatments for gambling may be a valuable tool in increasing help-seeking and treatment engagement in this population, and be integrated as part of stepped care approaches to treatment.";"Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Casey, 2017";"Casey_2017_msd_gsas_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"46";"Casey, 2017";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-110101495904128;272997519657883;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";3;3,61;24;7,53;4,31;40;9,97;3,27;60;8,14;4,19;55;2017;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"44.5";58;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Casey, L. M., Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., Horrigan, K., Day, J., Ireland, M., & Clough, B. A. (2017). Internet-based delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy compared to monitoring, feedback and support for problem gambling: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of gambling studies, 33(3), 993-1010.";"10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (I-CBT) for the treatment of problem gambling, when compared to a waitlist control and an active comparison condition consisting of monitoring, feedback, and support (I-MFS). Participants (N = 174) were randomly allocated to the three conditions. Variables of interest were gambling outcome and related mental health measures. Participants in the active conditions (I-CBT and I-MFS) completed six online modules. Both I-CBT and I-MFS conditions resulted in significant treatment gains on gambling severity. However, I-CBT was also associated with reductions in a range of other gambling-related and mental health outcomes. Compared with I-MFS, I-CBT produced greater effects across seven outcomes measures, relating to gambling urges, cognitions, stress, and life satisfaction. I-CBT participants also rated the program as significantly more satisfactory. Treatment gains observed for both active conditions were found to be stable through to 12 month follow up. The results indicate that the benefits of I-CBT were more than simply the non-specific effects of engaging in online treatment or receiving motivation, feedback, and support. Online treatments for gambling may be a valuable tool in increasing help-seeking and treatment engagement in this population, and be integrated as part of stepped care approaches to treatment.";"Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Casey, 2017";"Casey_2017_msd_sogs_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"47";"Casey, 2017";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";135661463209576;282430213264678;"msd";"qol";"NA";"swlq";12,28;26,33;18;7,92;33,87;38;12,75;4,86;60;16,67;6,97;55;2017;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"44.5";58;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Casey, L. M., Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., Horrigan, K., Day, J., Ireland, M., & Clough, B. A. (2017). Internet-based delivery of cognitive behaviour therapy compared to monitoring, feedback and support for problem gambling: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of gambling studies, 33(3), 993-1010.";"10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy program (I-CBT) for the treatment of problem gambling, when compared to a waitlist control and an active comparison condition consisting of monitoring, feedback, and support (I-MFS). Participants (N = 174) were randomly allocated to the three conditions. Variables of interest were gambling outcome and related mental health measures. Participants in the active conditions (I-CBT and I-MFS) completed six online modules. Both I-CBT and I-MFS conditions resulted in significant treatment gains on gambling severity. However, I-CBT was also associated with reductions in a range of other gambling-related and mental health outcomes. Compared with I-MFS, I-CBT produced greater effects across seven outcomes measures, relating to gambling urges, cognitions, stress, and life satisfaction. I-CBT participants also rated the program as significantly more satisfactory. Treatment gains observed for both active conditions were found to be stable through to 12 month follow up. The results indicate that the benefits of I-CBT were more than simply the non-specific effects of engaging in online treatment or receiving motivation, feedback, and support. Online treatments for gambling may be a valuable tool in increasing help-seeking and treatment engagement in this population, and be integrated as part of stepped care approaches to treatment.";"Internet-Based Delivery of Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Compared to Monitoring, Feedback and Support for Problem Gambling: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-016-9666-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Casey, 2017";"Casey_2017_msd_swlq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"48";"Cunningham, 2009";"pfi";"wl";"NA";"NA";-0,15340513094964;0,281615870380216;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"cpgi";11,6;4,9;24;12,5;6,5;25;15,4;5;24;14,5;5,6;25;2009;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"44.4";47;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., Rai, A., & Cordingley, J. (2009). Pilot study of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. Behavior Therapy, 40(3), 219-224.";"10.1016/j.beth.2008.06.005";"A pilot study was conducted of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. Respondents (N = 61) were recruited from an ongoing gambling research study to take part in another study to help us “develop and evaluate self-help materials for gamblers.” Respondents were randomly assigned to receive a personalized feedback summary or to a waiting list control. At 3-month follow-up (80.3% follow-up rate, N = 49), after controlling for baseline demographic characteristics and gambling severity, respondents in the feedback condition displayed some evidence that they were spending less money on gambling than those in the control condition. Further, ratings of the usefulness of the feedback summary were positive and most recipients (96%) recommended that they be made available to other gamblers interested in evaluating or modifying their gambling. Given these promising pilot results, a full-scale evaluation of these personalized feedback materials would appear justified. An online version of the intervention is now also available at www.CheckYourGambling.net.";"Pilot Study of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789408000762";"Behavior Therapy";"Cunningham, 2009";"Cunningham_2009_msd_cpgi_post_12_NA_pfi_wl_NA_NA"
"49";"Cunningham, 2009";"pfi";"wl";"NA";"NA";-0,399858566766128;0,284075453244151;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";965;1592,66;24;1771,3;2297,5;25;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2009;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"44.4";47;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., Rai, A., & Cordingley, J. (2009). Pilot study of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. Behavior Therapy, 40(3), 219-224.";"10.1016/j.beth.2008.06.005";"A pilot study was conducted of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. Respondents (N = 61) were recruited from an ongoing gambling research study to take part in another study to help us “develop and evaluate self-help materials for gamblers.” Respondents were randomly assigned to receive a personalized feedback summary or to a waiting list control. At 3-month follow-up (80.3% follow-up rate, N = 49), after controlling for baseline demographic characteristics and gambling severity, respondents in the feedback condition displayed some evidence that they were spending less money on gambling than those in the control condition. Further, ratings of the usefulness of the feedback summary were positive and most recipients (96%) recommended that they be made available to other gamblers interested in evaluating or modifying their gambling. Given these promising pilot results, a full-scale evaluation of these personalized feedback materials would appear justified. An online version of the intervention is now also available at www.CheckYourGambling.net.";"Pilot Study of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789408000762";"Behavior Therapy";"Cunningham, 2009";"Cunningham_2009_msd_global-intensity_post_12_NA_pfi_wl_NA_NA"
"50";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"partial";"wl";0,0141038721536408;0,16871390081988;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";9;7,8;70;8,9;6,2;69;10,9;9;70;9;6,9;69;2012;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-freq_post_12_NA_pfi_wl_partial_wl"
"51";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"full";"wl";0,318019936381904;0,169786530090287;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";11,3;8,6;70;8,9;6,2;69;10,9;9;70;9;6,9;69;2012;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-freq_post_12_NA_pfi_wl_full_wl"
"52";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"partial";"wl";0;0,168711780244103;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";8,6;7,5;70;8,6;6,6;69;10,9;9;70;9;6,9;69;2012;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_12_NA_pfi_wl_partial_wl"
"53";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"full";"wl";0,0927658526259129;0,168803494754654;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";9,3;8,3;70;8,6;6,6;69;10,9;9;70;9;6,9;69;2012;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_12_NA_pfi_wl_full_wl"
"54";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"partial";"wl";-0,333711450058703;0,169894827225421;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";7,2;7,3;70;9,7;7,6;69;10,9;9;70;9;6,9;69;2012;"24";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_24_NA_pfi_wl_partial_wl"
"55";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"full";"wl";0,142258827087005;0,168927386238866;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";10,9;9,1;70;9,7;7,6;69;10,9;9;70;9;6,9;69;2012;"24";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_24_NA_pfi_wl_full_wl"
"56";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"full";"wl";0,206005112314325;0,169163589024844;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";432;514,3;70;334,8;418,6;69;471,1;631,5;70;407;599,5;69;2012;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-intensity_post_12_NA_pfi_wl_full_wl"
"57";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"partial";"wl";0,300695647798848;0,169672946986832;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";481,4;542,3;70;334,8;418,6;69;471,1;631,5;70;407;599,5;69;2012;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-intensity_post_12_NA_pfi_wl_partial_wl"
"58";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"partial";"wl";0,173698769794607;0,169033116621621;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";412,8;550;70;327,2;420,7;69;471,1;631,5;70;407;599,5;69;2012;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-intensity_followup_12_NA_pfi_wl_partial_wl"
"59";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"full";"wl";0,0764869978118407;0,168774135746136;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";361,8;476,9;70;327,2;420,7;69;471,1;631,5;70;407;599,5;69;2012;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-intensity_followup_12_NA_pfi_wl_full_wl"
"60";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"full";"wl";0,0623423267147452;0,168753208103709;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";378,4;476;70;348,8;468,3;69;471,1;631,5;70;407;599,5;69;2012;"24";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-intensity_followup_24_NA_pfi_wl_full_wl"
"61";"Cunningham, 2012";"pfi";"wl";"partial";"wl";0,0351905927905017;0,16872498152204;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";366;503;70;348,8;468,3;69;471,1;631,5;70;407;599,5;69;2012;"24";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"46.6";47;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Hodgins, D. C., Toneatto, T., & Murphy, M. (2012). A randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers. PLoS One, 7(2), e31586.";"10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"Background: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. Methodology/Principal Findings: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. Conclusions/Significance: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person.";"A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers";"https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0031586";"PLOS ONE";"Cunningham, 2012";"Cunningham_2012_msd_global-intensity_followup_24_NA_pfi_wl_partial_wl"
"62";"Cunningham, 2019";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";763760147349928;119980287963933;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";9,71;7,72;129;9,12;7,69;149;17,41;7,86;151;15,71;7,81;170;2019;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"36.5";55;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Godinho, A., & Hodgins, D. C. (2019). Pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for problem gamblers. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 9, 100175.";"10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100175";"Introduction This pilot randomized controlled trial sought to evaluate whether an online intervention for problem gambling could lead to improved gambling outcomes compared to a no intervention control. Participants were recruited through a crowdsourcing platform.  Methods Participants were recruited to complete an online survey about their gambling through the Mechanical Turk platform. Those who scored 5 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index and were thinking about quitting or reducing their gambling were invited to complete 6-week and 6-month follow-ups. Each potential participant who agreed was sent a unique password. Participants who used their password to log onto the study portal were randomized to either access an online intervention for gambling or to a no intervention control. Results A total of 321 participants were recruited, of which 87% and 88% were followed-up at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively. Outcome analyses revealed that, while there were reductions in gambling from baseline to follow-ups, there was no significant observable impact of the online gambling intervention, as compared to a no intervention control condition. Conclusions While the current trial observed no impact of the intervention, replication is merited with a larger sample size, and with participants who are not recruited through a crowdsourcing platform.""";"Pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for problem gamblers";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853219300252";"Addictive Behaviors Reports";"Cunningham, 2019";"Cunningham_2019_msd_global-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"63";"Cunningham, 2019";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";998218999341146;119442814736421;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";7,86;7,66;127;7,09;7,72;155;17,41;7,86;151;15,71;7,81;170;2019;"18";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"36.5";55;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Godinho, A., & Hodgins, D. C. (2019). Pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for problem gamblers. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 9, 100175.";"10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100175";"Introduction This pilot randomized controlled trial sought to evaluate whether an online intervention for problem gambling could lead to improved gambling outcomes compared to a no intervention control. Participants were recruited through a crowdsourcing platform.  Methods Participants were recruited to complete an online survey about their gambling through the Mechanical Turk platform. Those who scored 5 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index and were thinking about quitting or reducing their gambling were invited to complete 6-week and 6-month follow-ups. Each potential participant who agreed was sent a unique password. Participants who used their password to log onto the study portal were randomized to either access an online intervention for gambling or to a no intervention control. Results A total of 321 participants were recruited, of which 87% and 88% were followed-up at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively. Outcome analyses revealed that, while there were reductions in gambling from baseline to follow-ups, there was no significant observable impact of the online gambling intervention, as compared to a no intervention control condition. Conclusions While the current trial observed no impact of the intervention, replication is merited with a larger sample size, and with participants who are not recruited through a crowdsourcing platform.""";"Pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for problem gamblers";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853219300252";"Addictive Behaviors Reports";"Cunningham, 2019";"Cunningham_2019_msd_global-freq_followup_18_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"64";"Cunningham, 2019";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";115359486762375;120036298148586;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gsas";7,16;2,95;129;6,82;2,93;149;8,26;2,95;151;8,21;3;170;2019;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"36.5";55;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Godinho, A., & Hodgins, D. C. (2019). Pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for problem gamblers. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 9, 100175.";"10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100175";"Introduction This pilot randomized controlled trial sought to evaluate whether an online intervention for problem gambling could lead to improved gambling outcomes compared to a no intervention control. Participants were recruited through a crowdsourcing platform.  Methods Participants were recruited to complete an online survey about their gambling through the Mechanical Turk platform. Those who scored 5 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index and were thinking about quitting or reducing their gambling were invited to complete 6-week and 6-month follow-ups. Each potential participant who agreed was sent a unique password. Participants who used their password to log onto the study portal were randomized to either access an online intervention for gambling or to a no intervention control. Results A total of 321 participants were recruited, of which 87% and 88% were followed-up at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively. Outcome analyses revealed that, while there were reductions in gambling from baseline to follow-ups, there was no significant observable impact of the online gambling intervention, as compared to a no intervention control condition. Conclusions While the current trial observed no impact of the intervention, replication is merited with a larger sample size, and with participants who are not recruited through a crowdsourcing platform.""";"Pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for problem gamblers";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853219300252";"Addictive Behaviors Reports";"Cunningham, 2019";"Cunningham_2019_msd_gsas_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"65";"Cunningham, 2019";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";471203443501135;119385322989274;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gsas";6,19;2,93;127;6,05;2,99;155;8,26;2,95;151;8,21;3;170;2019;"18";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"can";"36.5";55;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Cunningham, J. A., Godinho, A., & Hodgins, D. C. (2019). Pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for problem gamblers. Addictive Behaviors Reports, 9, 100175.";"10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100175";"Introduction This pilot randomized controlled trial sought to evaluate whether an online intervention for problem gambling could lead to improved gambling outcomes compared to a no intervention control. Participants were recruited through a crowdsourcing platform.  Methods Participants were recruited to complete an online survey about their gambling through the Mechanical Turk platform. Those who scored 5 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index and were thinking about quitting or reducing their gambling were invited to complete 6-week and 6-month follow-ups. Each potential participant who agreed was sent a unique password. Participants who used their password to log onto the study portal were randomized to either access an online intervention for gambling or to a no intervention control. Results A total of 321 participants were recruited, of which 87% and 88% were followed-up at 6 weeks and 6 months, respectively. Outcome analyses revealed that, while there were reductions in gambling from baseline to follow-ups, there was no significant observable impact of the online gambling intervention, as compared to a no intervention control condition. Conclusions While the current trial observed no impact of the intervention, replication is merited with a larger sample size, and with participants who are not recruited through a crowdsourcing platform.""";"Pilot randomized controlled trial of an online intervention for problem gamblers";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853219300252";"Addictive Behaviors Reports";"Cunningham, 2019";"Cunningham_2019_msd_gsas_followup_18_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"66";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"grp";"wl";-425406000189275;337593883181935;"msd";"depression";"NA";"bdi2";12,8;8,8;15;17,1;10,6;20;23,5;14;17;23,1;13,9;25;2007;"12";"post";"grp";"grp";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_bdi2_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_grp_wl"
"67";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"ind";"wl";-784039196872221;369188765245291;"msd";"depression";"NA";"bdi2";9,3;7,9;12;17,1;10,6;20;27;14,6;14;23,1;13,9;25;2007;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_bdi2_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_ind_wl"
"68";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"grp";"wl";-851084311467346;348901302817836;"msd";"gambling";"duration";"dd - duration";98;72;15;265;245;20;199;145;17;207;199;25;2007;"12";"post";"grp";"grp";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_dd-duration_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_grp_wl"
"69";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"ind";"wl";-106507991567754;380026722026754;"msd";"gambling";"duration";"dd - duration";45;83;12;265;245;20;227;232;14;207;199;25;2007;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_dd-duration_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_ind_wl"
"70";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"grp";"wl";-876604540008169;349802788355625;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"dd - freq";0,9;0,7;15;2;1,5;20;1,8;1,4;17;1,8;1,6;25;2007;"12";"post";"grp";"grp";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_dd-freq_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_grp_wl"
"71";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"ind";"wl";-126644385050317;389558736841667;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"dd - freq";0,4;0,5;12;2;1,5;20;1,7;1,6;14;1,8;1,6;25;2007;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_dd-freq_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_ind_wl"
"72";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"grp";"wl";-557949006720594;34034039528586;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"dd - intensity";162;129;15;303;306;20;253;197;17;244;276;25;2007;"12";"post";"grp";"grp";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_dd-intensity_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_grp_wl"
"73";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"ind";"wl";-107649462640712;380528934079454;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"dd - intensity";32;50;12;303;306;20;243;243;14;244;276;25;2007;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_dd-intensity_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_ind_wl"
"74";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"grp";"wl";-388492060692419;33695760465745;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"stai-s";55,3;12,5;15;61,7;18,3;20;63,2;13,4;17;68,2;17,7;25;2007;"12";"post";"grp";"grp";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_stai-s_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_grp_wl"
"75";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"ind";"wl";-554324919292488;362624562530987;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"stai-s";52,1;14,1;12;61,7;18,3;20;70,2;17,2;14;68,2;17,7;25;2007;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_stai-s_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_ind_wl"
"76";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"grp";"wl";-196192204450678;334565714523432;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"stai-t";63,2;13,2;15;66,3;16,9;20;75;13;17;71,8;16;25;2007;"12";"post";"grp";"grp";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_stai-t_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_grp_wl"
"77";"Dowling, 2007";"cbt";"wl";"ind";"wl";-696742654583189;366443099799817;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"stai-t";54,7;15;12;66,3;16,9;20;74,6;17,7;14;71,8;16;25;2007;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"43.6";100;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Dowling, N., Smith, D., & Thomas, T. (2007). A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45(9), 2192-2202.";"10.1016/j.brat.2006.11.003";"The current study aimed to determine the differential efficacy of a cognitive-behavioural treatment program for female pathological gamblers delivered in individual and group format. Fifty-six female pathological gamblers with electronic gaming machine gambling problems were randomly assigned to the control (waiting list) group or one of the treatment groups (individual or group treatment). Treatment comprised a 12-session program including financial limit setting, alternative activity planning, cognitive correction, problem solving, communication training, relapse prevention, and imaginal desensitisation. Treatment outcome was evaluated with conceptually related measures within the areas of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning. While individual and group treatment formats generally produced comparable outcomes in terms of gambling behaviour and psychological functioning, group treatment failed to produce superior outcomes to the control group in relation to several measures of psychological functioning. Moreover, by the completion of the six-month follow-up, 92% of the gamblers allocated to individual treatment compared with 60% allocated to group treatment no longer satisfied the diagnostic criteria for pathological gambling. These findings suggest that some caution should be employed when delivering cognitive-behavioural treatment in a group format until further research is conducted to establish its efficacy.";"A comparison of individual and group cognitive-behavioural treatment for female pathological gambling";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796706002671";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Dowling, 2007";"Dowling_2007_msd_stai-t_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_ind_wl"
"78";"Ede, 2020";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-715843870106325;858257840034224;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gsas";9,03;2,01;20;33,59;4,31;20;36,62;2,13;20;35,99;1,34;20;2020;"4";"follow up";"grp";"grp";"oth";"23";3;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Ede, M. O., Omeje, J. C., Ncheke, D. C., Agah, J. J., Chinweuba, N. H., & Amoke, C. V. (2020). Assessment of the effectiveness of group cognitive behavioural therapy in reducing pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1325-1339.";"10.1007/s10899-020-09981-y";"Pathological gambling is a developmental disorder usually associated with a continuous loss of control over gambling; it also involves a preoccupation with gambling and with obtaining money for the same purpose of gambling, irrational thinking, and a continuation of the behaviour despite being aware of its adverse consequences. This study examined the effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioural therapy (GCBT) on pathological gambling among Nigerian students. The study used a group randomised controlled trial design to assign participants to intervention and control groups. A total of 40 undergraduate students, aged 18–30, were classified as pathological gamblers (participants) in this study. Participants completed self-report scales titled South oaks gambling screen and Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale at three-time points. The intervention lasted for 8 weeks. The data collected were statistically analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results revealed that GCBT has a significant effect in decreasing the symptoms of pathological gambling among the participants in GCBT compared to those in the control group and that the improvements were maintained at follow-up. The study concluded that group cognitive-behavioural therapy is impactful therapy in reducing pathological gambling among students. It has also validated the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy in altering erroneous thoughts and replacing it with a better alternative realistic way of thinking.";"Assessment of the Effectiveness of Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Reducing Pathological Gambling";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-020-09981-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Ede, 2020";"Ede_2020_msd_gsas_followup_4_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"79";"Ede, 2020";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-667401157757693;807989074022412;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gsas";10,6;1,27;20;33,67;4,62;20;36,62;2,13;20;35,99;1,34;20;2020;"8";"post";"grp";"grp";"oth";"23";3;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Ede, M. O., Omeje, J. C., Ncheke, D. C., Agah, J. J., Chinweuba, N. H., & Amoke, C. V. (2020). Assessment of the effectiveness of group cognitive behavioural therapy in reducing pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1325-1339.";"10.1007/s10899-020-09981-y";"Pathological gambling is a developmental disorder usually associated with a continuous loss of control over gambling; it also involves a preoccupation with gambling and with obtaining money for the same purpose of gambling, irrational thinking, and a continuation of the behaviour despite being aware of its adverse consequences. This study examined the effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioural therapy (GCBT) on pathological gambling among Nigerian students. The study used a group randomised controlled trial design to assign participants to intervention and control groups. A total of 40 undergraduate students, aged 18–30, were classified as pathological gamblers (participants) in this study. Participants completed self-report scales titled South oaks gambling screen and Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale at three-time points. The intervention lasted for 8 weeks. The data collected were statistically analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results revealed that GCBT has a significant effect in decreasing the symptoms of pathological gambling among the participants in GCBT compared to those in the control group and that the improvements were maintained at follow-up. The study concluded that group cognitive-behavioural therapy is impactful therapy in reducing pathological gambling among students. It has also validated the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy in altering erroneous thoughts and replacing it with a better alternative realistic way of thinking.";"Assessment of the Effectiveness of Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Reducing Pathological Gambling";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-020-09981-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Ede, 2020";"Ede_2020_msd_gsas_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"80";"Ede, 2020";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-434209239528654;57596704908725;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";24,57;1,64;20;59,44;11,01;20;71,74;3,19;20;72,27;2,86;20;2020;"8";"post";"grp";"grp";"oth";"23";3;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Ede, M. O., Omeje, J. C., Ncheke, D. C., Agah, J. J., Chinweuba, N. H., & Amoke, C. V. (2020). Assessment of the effectiveness of group cognitive behavioural therapy in reducing pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1325-1339.";"10.1007/s10899-020-09981-y";"Pathological gambling is a developmental disorder usually associated with a continuous loss of control over gambling; it also involves a preoccupation with gambling and with obtaining money for the same purpose of gambling, irrational thinking, and a continuation of the behaviour despite being aware of its adverse consequences. This study examined the effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioural therapy (GCBT) on pathological gambling among Nigerian students. The study used a group randomised controlled trial design to assign participants to intervention and control groups. A total of 40 undergraduate students, aged 18–30, were classified as pathological gamblers (participants) in this study. Participants completed self-report scales titled South oaks gambling screen and Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale at three-time points. The intervention lasted for 8 weeks. The data collected were statistically analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results revealed that GCBT has a significant effect in decreasing the symptoms of pathological gambling among the participants in GCBT compared to those in the control group and that the improvements were maintained at follow-up. The study concluded that group cognitive-behavioural therapy is impactful therapy in reducing pathological gambling among students. It has also validated the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy in altering erroneous thoughts and replacing it with a better alternative realistic way of thinking.";"Assessment of the Effectiveness of Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Reducing Pathological Gambling";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-020-09981-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Ede, 2020";"Ede_2020_msd_sogs_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"81";"Ede, 2020";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-364583705453902;512071830774094;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";23,62;1,81;20;54,89;11,75;20;71,74;3,19;20;72,27;2,86;20;2020;"4";"follow up";"grp";"grp";"oth";"23";3;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Ede, M. O., Omeje, J. C., Ncheke, D. C., Agah, J. J., Chinweuba, N. H., & Amoke, C. V. (2020). Assessment of the effectiveness of group cognitive behavioural therapy in reducing pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1325-1339.";"10.1007/s10899-020-09981-y";"Pathological gambling is a developmental disorder usually associated with a continuous loss of control over gambling; it also involves a preoccupation with gambling and with obtaining money for the same purpose of gambling, irrational thinking, and a continuation of the behaviour despite being aware of its adverse consequences. This study examined the effectiveness of group cognitive-behavioural therapy (GCBT) on pathological gambling among Nigerian students. The study used a group randomised controlled trial design to assign participants to intervention and control groups. A total of 40 undergraduate students, aged 18–30, were classified as pathological gamblers (participants) in this study. Participants completed self-report scales titled South oaks gambling screen and Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale at three-time points. The intervention lasted for 8 weeks. The data collected were statistically analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA. Results revealed that GCBT has a significant effect in decreasing the symptoms of pathological gambling among the participants in GCBT compared to those in the control group and that the improvements were maintained at follow-up. The study concluded that group cognitive-behavioural therapy is impactful therapy in reducing pathological gambling among students. It has also validated the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural therapy in altering erroneous thoughts and replacing it with a better alternative realistic way of thinking.";"Assessment of the Effectiveness of Group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in Reducing Pathological Gambling";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-020-09981-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Ede, 2020";"Ede_2020_msd_sogs_followup_4_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"82";"Grant, 2009";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-889231808969184;251700597179558;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gsas";19,9;11,2;33;29,7;10,6;35;29,3;7,7;33;30,2;7,99;35;2009;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"48.7";63;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Grant, J. E., Donahue, C. B., Odlaug, B. L., Kim, S. W., Miller, M. J., & Petry, N. M. (2009). Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(3), 266-267.";"10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062414";"Sixty-eight individuals were randomised to either six sessions of imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing (IDMI) or Gamblers Anonymous. Individuals assigned to IDMI had significantly greater reductions in Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling total scores, gambling urges and gambling behaviour. People who failed to respond to Gamblers Anonymous reported significantly greater reduction in pathological gambling symptoms following later assignment to IDMI. Abstinence was achieved by 63.6% during the acute IDMI treatment period.";"Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial";"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/imaginal-desensitisation-plus-motivational-interviewing-for-pathological-gambling-randomised-controlled-trial/7A2F7986A04C4DDE62C30BDD38B4258F";"The British Journal of Psychiatry";"Grant, 2009";"Grant_2009_msd_gsas_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"83";"Grant, 2009";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-714355776967332;247570621095071;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"has";3,73;3,8;33;6,37;3,51;35;4,88;3,92;33;6,2;3,75;35;2009;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"48.7";63;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Grant, J. E., Donahue, C. B., Odlaug, B. L., Kim, S. W., Miller, M. J., & Petry, N. M. (2009). Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(3), 266-267.";"10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062414";"Sixty-eight individuals were randomised to either six sessions of imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing (IDMI) or Gamblers Anonymous. Individuals assigned to IDMI had significantly greater reductions in Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling total scores, gambling urges and gambling behaviour. People who failed to respond to Gamblers Anonymous reported significantly greater reduction in pathological gambling symptoms following later assignment to IDMI. Abstinence was achieved by 63.6% during the acute IDMI treatment period.";"Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial";"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/imaginal-desensitisation-plus-motivational-interviewing-for-pathological-gambling-randomised-controlled-trial/7A2F7986A04C4DDE62C30BDD38B4258F";"The British Journal of Psychiatry";"Grant, 2009";"Grant_2009_msd_has_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"84";"Grant, 2009";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-676088396081692;246779197474358;"msd";"depression";"NA";"hrsd";4,64;4,83;33;8;4,99;35;6,36;5,11;33;7,6;4,71;35;2009;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"48.7";63;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Grant, J. E., Donahue, C. B., Odlaug, B. L., Kim, S. W., Miller, M. J., & Petry, N. M. (2009). Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(3), 266-267.";"10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062414";"Sixty-eight individuals were randomised to either six sessions of imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing (IDMI) or Gamblers Anonymous. Individuals assigned to IDMI had significantly greater reductions in Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling total scores, gambling urges and gambling behaviour. People who failed to respond to Gamblers Anonymous reported significantly greater reduction in pathological gambling symptoms following later assignment to IDMI. Abstinence was achieved by 63.6% during the acute IDMI treatment period.";"Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial";"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/imaginal-desensitisation-plus-motivational-interviewing-for-pathological-gambling-randomised-controlled-trial/7A2F7986A04C4DDE62C30BDD38B4258F";"The British Journal of Psychiatry";"Grant, 2009";"Grant_2009_msd_hrsd_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"85";"Grant, 2009";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";573384326521997;244859958478863;"msd";"qol";"NA";"qoli";40,9;12,4;33;32,6;15,9;35;36,6;13,5;33;31,4;16,1;35;2009;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"48.7";63;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Grant, J. E., Donahue, C. B., Odlaug, B. L., Kim, S. W., Miller, M. J., & Petry, N. M. (2009). Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(3), 266-267.";"10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062414";"Sixty-eight individuals were randomised to either six sessions of imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing (IDMI) or Gamblers Anonymous. Individuals assigned to IDMI had significantly greater reductions in Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling total scores, gambling urges and gambling behaviour. People who failed to respond to Gamblers Anonymous reported significantly greater reduction in pathological gambling symptoms following later assignment to IDMI. Abstinence was achieved by 63.6% during the acute IDMI treatment period.";"Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial";"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/imaginal-desensitisation-plus-motivational-interviewing-for-pathological-gambling-randomised-controlled-trial/7A2F7986A04C4DDE62C30BDD38B4258F";"The British Journal of Psychiatry";"Grant, 2009";"Grant_2009_msd_qoli_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"86";"Grant, 2009";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-116246598308992;259759898698226;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"ybocs";9;7,78;33;18,1;7,7;35;19,1;5,45;33;19,7;5,81;35;2009;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"48.7";63;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Grant, J. E., Donahue, C. B., Odlaug, B. L., Kim, S. W., Miller, M. J., & Petry, N. M. (2009). Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 195(3), 266-267.";"10.1192/bjp.bp.108.062414";"Sixty-eight individuals were randomised to either six sessions of imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing (IDMI) or Gamblers Anonymous. Individuals assigned to IDMI had significantly greater reductions in Yale–Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling total scores, gambling urges and gambling behaviour. People who failed to respond to Gamblers Anonymous reported significantly greater reduction in pathological gambling symptoms following later assignment to IDMI. Abstinence was achieved by 63.6% during the acute IDMI treatment period.";"Imaginal desensitisation plus motivational interviewing for pathological gambling: randomised controlled trial";"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/imaginal-desensitisation-plus-motivational-interviewing-for-pathological-gambling-randomised-controlled-trial/7A2F7986A04C4DDE62C30BDD38B4258F";"The British Journal of Psychiatry";"Grant, 2009";"Grant_2009_msd_ybocs_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"87";"Harris, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-135658346350371;402727908750111;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"dsm-iv";2,13;1,96;15;5,14;2,35;14;6,5;1,32;16;7,13;1,41;16;2016;"8";"post";"grp";"grp";"can";"34.200000000000003";47;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Harris, N., & Mazmanian, D. (2016). Cognitive behavioural group therapy for problem gamblers who gamble over the internet: A controlled study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 33, 170-188.";"10.4309/jgi.2016.33.10";"Several studies have found higher rates of problem gambling among Internet gamblers than non-Internet gamblers. Because of easy access and convenience, along with other gaming characteristics, many researchers in the field have advanced the argument that Internet gambling is potentially more addictive and problematic than land-based gambling activities. However, research examining the efficacy of treatments for problem gamblers who gamble over the Internet has not yet been conducted. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of group cognitive behavioural therapy for self-identified problem Internet gamblers. (n = 16) or wait list (delayed treatment) comparison group (n = 16). Results indicated that the treatment was efficacious in improving three of the four dependent variables from pre- to post-test/treatment: number of DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling endorsed, perception of control over gambling, and number of sessions gambled. No significant pre- to post-test/treatment difference was found between groups on desire to gamble. Groups were combined to examine treatment outcome over time, with results showing significant pre- to post-treatment and pre- to three-month post-treatment improvement for all four dependent variables.";"Cognitive behavioural group therapy for problem gamblers who gamble over the internet: A controlled study";"https://cdspress.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Nicholas-Harris-Dwight-Mazmanian.pdf";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"Harris, 2016";"Harris_2016_msd_dsm-iv_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"88";"Harris, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-106590399830218;387361526144519;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";4,43;4,8;15;10,71;6,58;14;11,53;4;16;11,75;5,09;16;2016;"8";"post";"grp";"grp";"can";"34.200000000000003";47;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Harris, N., & Mazmanian, D. (2016). Cognitive behavioural group therapy for problem gamblers who gamble over the internet: A controlled study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 33, 170-188.";"10.4309/jgi.2016.33.10";"Several studies have found higher rates of problem gambling among Internet gamblers than non-Internet gamblers. Because of easy access and convenience, along with other gaming characteristics, many researchers in the field have advanced the argument that Internet gambling is potentially more addictive and problematic than land-based gambling activities. However, research examining the efficacy of treatments for problem gamblers who gamble over the Internet has not yet been conducted. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of group cognitive behavioural therapy for self-identified problem Internet gamblers. (n = 16) or wait list (delayed treatment) comparison group (n = 16). Results indicated that the treatment was efficacious in improving three of the four dependent variables from pre- to post-test/treatment: number of DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling endorsed, perception of control over gambling, and number of sessions gambled. No significant pre- to post-test/treatment difference was found between groups on desire to gamble. Groups were combined to examine treatment outcome over time, with results showing significant pre- to post-treatment and pre- to three-month post-treatment improvement for all four dependent variables.";"Cognitive behavioural group therapy for problem gamblers who gamble over the internet: A controlled study";"https://cdspress.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Nicholas-Harris-Dwight-Mazmanian.pdf";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"Harris, 2016";"Harris_2016_msd_global-freq_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"89";"Hodgins, 2001";"cbt";"wl";"wb";"wl";-203298195659059;242173256970371;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";4,7;5,4;33;6;7,1;34;9,5;7,4;33;9,2;8,2;34;2001;"12";"post";"ind";"ush";"can";"46";52;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., & el-Guebaly, N. (2001). Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 50-57.";"10.1037/0022-006X.69.1.50";"Two brief treatments for problem gambling were compared with a waiting-list control in a randomized trial. Eighty-four percent of participants (N = 102) reported a significant reduction in gambling over a 12-month follow-up period. Participants who received a motivational enhancement telephone intervention and a self-help workbook in the mail, but not those who received the workbook only, had better outcomes than participants in a 1-month waiting-list control. Participants who received the motivational interview and workbook showed better outcomes than those receiving the workbook only at 3-and 6-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, the advantage of the motivational interview and workbook condition was found only for participants with less severe gambling problems. Overall, these results support the effectiveness of a brief telephone and mail-based treatment for problem gambling.";"Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-14541-006";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Hodgins, 2001";"Hodgins_2001_msd_tlfb-freq_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_wb_wl"
"90";"Hodgins, 2001";"cbt";"wl";"mi";"wl";-273060898521179;246531976983723;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";4,3;4,9;31;6;7,1;34;10,2;7,9;31;9,2;8,2;34;2001;"12";"post";"ind";"ush";"can";"46";52;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., & el-Guebaly, N. (2001). Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 50-57.";"10.1037/0022-006X.69.1.50";"Two brief treatments for problem gambling were compared with a waiting-list control in a randomized trial. Eighty-four percent of participants (N = 102) reported a significant reduction in gambling over a 12-month follow-up period. Participants who received a motivational enhancement telephone intervention and a self-help workbook in the mail, but not those who received the workbook only, had better outcomes than participants in a 1-month waiting-list control. Participants who received the motivational interview and workbook showed better outcomes than those receiving the workbook only at 3-and 6-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, the advantage of the motivational interview and workbook condition was found only for participants with less severe gambling problems. Overall, these results support the effectiveness of a brief telephone and mail-based treatment for problem gambling.";"Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-14541-006";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Hodgins, 2001";"Hodgins_2001_msd_tlfb-freq_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_mi_wl"
"91";"Hodgins, 2001";"cbt";"wl";"mi";"wl";-625389631197836;251421986284229;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";62,3;95,9;31;141,1;145,7;34;157,9;130,3;31;197,6;157,8;34;2001;"12";"post";"ind";"ush";"can";"46";52;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., & el-Guebaly, N. (2001). Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 50-57.";"10.1037/0022-006X.69.1.50";"Two brief treatments for problem gambling were compared with a waiting-list control in a randomized trial. Eighty-four percent of participants (N = 102) reported a significant reduction in gambling over a 12-month follow-up period. Participants who received a motivational enhancement telephone intervention and a self-help workbook in the mail, but not those who received the workbook only, had better outcomes than participants in a 1-month waiting-list control. Participants who received the motivational interview and workbook showed better outcomes than those receiving the workbook only at 3-and 6-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, the advantage of the motivational interview and workbook condition was found only for participants with less severe gambling problems. Overall, these results support the effectiveness of a brief telephone and mail-based treatment for problem gambling.";"Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-14541-006";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Hodgins, 2001";"Hodgins_2001_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_mi_wl"
"92";"Hodgins, 2001";"cbt";"wl";"wb";"wl";-202658004977114;24216925262856;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";184,7;264,5;33;141,1;145,7;34;287;431,4;33;197,6;157,8;34;2001;"12";"post";"ind";"ush";"can";"46";52;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., & el-Guebaly, N. (2001). Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(1), 50-57.";"10.1037/0022-006X.69.1.50";"Two brief treatments for problem gambling were compared with a waiting-list control in a randomized trial. Eighty-four percent of participants (N = 102) reported a significant reduction in gambling over a 12-month follow-up period. Participants who received a motivational enhancement telephone intervention and a self-help workbook in the mail, but not those who received the workbook only, had better outcomes than participants in a 1-month waiting-list control. Participants who received the motivational interview and workbook showed better outcomes than those receiving the workbook only at 3-and 6-month follow-ups. At the 12-month follow-up, the advantage of the motivational interview and workbook condition was found only for participants with less severe gambling problems. Overall, these results support the effectiveness of a brief telephone and mail-based treatment for problem gambling.";"Motivational enhancement and self-help treatments for problem gambling.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-14541-006";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Hodgins, 2001";"Hodgins_2001_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_wb_wl"
"93";"Hodgins, 2009";"cbt";"wl";"wb + mi + telephone";"wl";-0,146242539637965;0,16456889352107;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";4,8;5,9;84;5,7;6,4;65;8;6,6;84;NA;NA;65;2009;"6";"post";"ind";"gsh";"can";"35";55;1;0;1;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., Currie, G., & Fick, G. H. (2009). Randomized trial of brief motivational treatments for pathological gamblers: More is not necessarily better. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(5), 950-960.";"https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016318";"The efficacy of brief treatments for media-recruited pathological gamblers was tested in a randomized clinical trial design (N = 314). Two self-directed motivational interventions were compared with a 6-week waiting list control and a workbook only control. Brief motivational treatment involved a telephone motivational interview and a mailed self-help workbook. Brief motivational booster treatment involved a telephone motivational interview, a workbook, and 6 booster telephone calls over a 9-month period. Primary outcomes were gambling frequency and dollar losses. As hypothesized, brief and brief booster treatment participants reported less gambling at 6 weeks than those assigned to the control groups. Brief and brief booster treatment participants gambled significantly less often over the first 6 months of the follow-up than workbook only participants. However, the workbook only participants were as likely to have significantly reduced their losses over the year and to have not met criteria for pathological gambling. Contrary to the hypothesis, participants in the brief booster treatment group showed no greater improvement than brief treatment participants. These results provide further support for the value of brief motivational treatments for pathological gambling.";"Randomized trial of brief motivational treatments for pathological gamblers: More is not necessarily better.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-17643-015";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Hodgins, 2009";"Hodgins_2009_msd_tlfb-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_wb+mi+telephone_wl"
"94";"Hodgins, 2009";"cbt";"wl";"wb";"wl";0,0163602635642575;0,16521376385328;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";6,6;7,3;82;5,7;6,4;65;8,3;6,7;82;NA;NA;65;2009;"6";"post";"ind";"ush";"can";"35";55;1;0;1;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., Currie, G., & Fick, G. H. (2009). Randomized trial of brief motivational treatments for pathological gamblers: More is not necessarily better. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(5), 950-960.";"https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016318";"The efficacy of brief treatments for media-recruited pathological gamblers was tested in a randomized clinical trial design (N = 314). Two self-directed motivational interventions were compared with a 6-week waiting list control and a workbook only control. Brief motivational treatment involved a telephone motivational interview and a mailed self-help workbook. Brief motivational booster treatment involved a telephone motivational interview, a workbook, and 6 booster telephone calls over a 9-month period. Primary outcomes were gambling frequency and dollar losses. As hypothesized, brief and brief booster treatment participants reported less gambling at 6 weeks than those assigned to the control groups. Brief and brief booster treatment participants gambled significantly less often over the first 6 months of the follow-up than workbook only participants. However, the workbook only participants were as likely to have significantly reduced their losses over the year and to have not met criteria for pathological gambling. Contrary to the hypothesis, participants in the brief booster treatment group showed no greater improvement than brief treatment participants. These results provide further support for the value of brief motivational treatments for pathological gambling.";"Randomized trial of brief motivational treatments for pathological gamblers: More is not necessarily better.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-17643-015";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Hodgins, 2009";"Hodgins_2009_msd_tlfb-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_wb_wl"
"95";"Hodgins, 2009";"cbt";"wl";"wb + mi";"wl";-0,0220271285893833;0,164781207572356;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";4,7;6;83;5,7;6,4;65;8;7,3;83;NA;NA;65;2009;"6";"post";"ind";"ush";"can";"35";55;1;0;1;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Hodgins, D. C., Currie, S. R., Currie, G., & Fick, G. H. (2009). Randomized trial of brief motivational treatments for pathological gamblers: More is not necessarily better. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(5), 950-960.";"https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016318";"The efficacy of brief treatments for media-recruited pathological gamblers was tested in a randomized clinical trial design (N = 314). Two self-directed motivational interventions were compared with a 6-week waiting list control and a workbook only control. Brief motivational treatment involved a telephone motivational interview and a mailed self-help workbook. Brief motivational booster treatment involved a telephone motivational interview, a workbook, and 6 booster telephone calls over a 9-month period. Primary outcomes were gambling frequency and dollar losses. As hypothesized, brief and brief booster treatment participants reported less gambling at 6 weeks than those assigned to the control groups. Brief and brief booster treatment participants gambled significantly less often over the first 6 months of the follow-up than workbook only participants. However, the workbook only participants were as likely to have significantly reduced their losses over the year and to have not met criteria for pathological gambling. Contrary to the hypothesis, participants in the brief booster treatment group showed no greater improvement than brief treatment participants. These results provide further support for the value of brief motivational treatments for pathological gambling.";"Randomized trial of brief motivational treatments for pathological gamblers: More is not necessarily better.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-17643-015";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Hodgins, 2009";"Hodgins_2009_msd_tlfb-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_wb+mi_wl"
"96";"LaBrie, 2012";"cbt";"wl";"nv-t";"wl";-220375234894953;185892263962913;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";8,8;8,32;59;10,6;7,89;56;15;8;59;15;9;56;2012;"8";"follow up";"ind";"ush";"us";"44";26;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"LaBrie, R. A., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Bernhard, B., Harper, A., Schrier, T., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 278-289.";"10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x";"Two studies conducted in Massachusetts and Nevada evaluated the efficacy of a self‐help toolkit for problem gambling. Individuals concerned about gambling‐related problems, in response to public notices and newspaper advertisements, volunteered for a randomized trial of the self‐help toolkit, Your First Step to Change: Gambling. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) a printed toolkit, (b) the toolkit and a brief guide to the toolkit’s content, or (c) assignment to a wait‐list condition. Participants, 145 in Massachusetts and 170 in Nevada, reported their gambling behavior, beliefs and attitudes about chance, and recent and planned help seeking at baseline, 88% at 1 month later, and 79% at 3 months later. Findings for the complete and intent‐to‐treat analyses at both sites indicated that participants significantly improved. At the end of the study period, significantly more toolkit recipients than control group participants reported recently abstaining from gambling. Minimally invasive, self‐directed resources like this self‐help toolkit can assist remediating gambling‐related problems among gamblers who do not engage in formal treatment. ";"A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: A randomized multisite trial.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-10324-014";"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry";"LaBrie, 2012";"LaBrie_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_8_NA_cbt_wl_nv-t_wl"
"97";"LaBrie, 2012";"cbt";"wl";"nv-t";"wl";-840158755575795;185406230811765;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";11,1;7,79;59;11,8;8,76;56;15;8;59;15;9;56;2012;"4";"post";"ind";"ush";"us";"44";26;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"LaBrie, R. A., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Bernhard, B., Harper, A., Schrier, T., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 278-289.";"10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x";"Two studies conducted in Massachusetts and Nevada evaluated the efficacy of a self‐help toolkit for problem gambling. Individuals concerned about gambling‐related problems, in response to public notices and newspaper advertisements, volunteered for a randomized trial of the self‐help toolkit, Your First Step to Change: Gambling. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) a printed toolkit, (b) the toolkit and a brief guide to the toolkit’s content, or (c) assignment to a wait‐list condition. Participants, 145 in Massachusetts and 170 in Nevada, reported their gambling behavior, beliefs and attitudes about chance, and recent and planned help seeking at baseline, 88% at 1 month later, and 79% at 3 months later. Findings for the complete and intent‐to‐treat analyses at both sites indicated that participants significantly improved. At the end of the study period, significantly more toolkit recipients than control group participants reported recently abstaining from gambling. Minimally invasive, self‐directed resources like this self‐help toolkit can assist remediating gambling‐related problems among gamblers who do not engage in formal treatment. ";"A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: A randomized multisite trial.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-10324-014";"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry";"LaBrie, 2012";"LaBrie_2012_msd_global-freq_post_4_NA_cbt_wl_nv-t_wl"
"98";"LaBrie, 2012";"cbt";"wl";"nv-gt";"wl";-537982682402936;191956515620076;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";6,6;6,83;55;10,6;7,89;56;14;9;55;15;9;56;2012;"8";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"us";"44";26;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"LaBrie, R. A., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Bernhard, B., Harper, A., Schrier, T., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 278-289.";"10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x";"Two studies conducted in Massachusetts and Nevada evaluated the efficacy of a self‐help toolkit for problem gambling. Individuals concerned about gambling‐related problems, in response to public notices and newspaper advertisements, volunteered for a randomized trial of the self‐help toolkit, Your First Step to Change: Gambling. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) a printed toolkit, (b) the toolkit and a brief guide to the toolkit’s content, or (c) assignment to a wait‐list condition. Participants, 145 in Massachusetts and 170 in Nevada, reported their gambling behavior, beliefs and attitudes about chance, and recent and planned help seeking at baseline, 88% at 1 month later, and 79% at 3 months later. Findings for the complete and intent‐to‐treat analyses at both sites indicated that participants significantly improved. At the end of the study period, significantly more toolkit recipients than control group participants reported recently abstaining from gambling. Minimally invasive, self‐directed resources like this self‐help toolkit can assist remediating gambling‐related problems among gamblers who do not engage in formal treatment. ";"A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: A randomized multisite trial.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-10324-014";"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry";"LaBrie, 2012";"LaBrie_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_8_NA_cbt_wl_nv-gt_wl"
"99";"LaBrie, 2012";"cbt";"wl";"nv-gt";"wl";-342479111497927;189926112216895;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";9;7,41;55;11,8;8,76;56;14;9;55;15;9;56;2012;"4";"post";"ind";"gsh";"us";"44";26;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"LaBrie, R. A., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Bernhard, B., Harper, A., Schrier, T., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 278-289.";"10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x";"Two studies conducted in Massachusetts and Nevada evaluated the efficacy of a self‐help toolkit for problem gambling. Individuals concerned about gambling‐related problems, in response to public notices and newspaper advertisements, volunteered for a randomized trial of the self‐help toolkit, Your First Step to Change: Gambling. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) a printed toolkit, (b) the toolkit and a brief guide to the toolkit’s content, or (c) assignment to a wait‐list condition. Participants, 145 in Massachusetts and 170 in Nevada, reported their gambling behavior, beliefs and attitudes about chance, and recent and planned help seeking at baseline, 88% at 1 month later, and 79% at 3 months later. Findings for the complete and intent‐to‐treat analyses at both sites indicated that participants significantly improved. At the end of the study period, significantly more toolkit recipients than control group participants reported recently abstaining from gambling. Minimally invasive, self‐directed resources like this self‐help toolkit can assist remediating gambling‐related problems among gamblers who do not engage in formal treatment. ";"A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: A randomized multisite trial.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-10324-014";"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry";"LaBrie, 2012";"LaBrie_2012_msd_global-freq_post_4_NA_cbt_wl_nv-gt_wl"
"100";"LaBrie, 2012";"cbt";"wl";"ma-t";"wl";-126647173795788;203845138942673;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";15,8;10,06;49;17,1;10,31;46;21;9;49;21;10;46;2012;"4";"post";"ind";"ush";"us";"44";26;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"LaBrie, R. A., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Bernhard, B., Harper, A., Schrier, T., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 278-289.";"10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x";"Two studies conducted in Massachusetts and Nevada evaluated the efficacy of a self‐help toolkit for problem gambling. Individuals concerned about gambling‐related problems, in response to public notices and newspaper advertisements, volunteered for a randomized trial of the self‐help toolkit, Your First Step to Change: Gambling. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) a printed toolkit, (b) the toolkit and a brief guide to the toolkit’s content, or (c) assignment to a wait‐list condition. Participants, 145 in Massachusetts and 170 in Nevada, reported their gambling behavior, beliefs and attitudes about chance, and recent and planned help seeking at baseline, 88% at 1 month later, and 79% at 3 months later. Findings for the complete and intent‐to‐treat analyses at both sites indicated that participants significantly improved. At the end of the study period, significantly more toolkit recipients than control group participants reported recently abstaining from gambling. Minimally invasive, self‐directed resources like this self‐help toolkit can assist remediating gambling‐related problems among gamblers who do not engage in formal treatment. ";"A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: A randomized multisite trial.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-10324-014";"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry";"LaBrie, 2012";"LaBrie_2012_msd_global-freq_post_4_NA_cbt_wl_ma-t_wl"
"101";"LaBrie, 2012";"cbt";"wl";"ma-t";"wl";-20374882444863;204173736702731;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";14,3;10,5;49;16,4;9,92;46;21;9;49;21;10;46;2012;"8";"follow up";"ind";"ush";"us";"44";26;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"LaBrie, R. A., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Bernhard, B., Harper, A., Schrier, T., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 278-289.";"10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x";"Two studies conducted in Massachusetts and Nevada evaluated the efficacy of a self‐help toolkit for problem gambling. Individuals concerned about gambling‐related problems, in response to public notices and newspaper advertisements, volunteered for a randomized trial of the self‐help toolkit, Your First Step to Change: Gambling. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) a printed toolkit, (b) the toolkit and a brief guide to the toolkit’s content, or (c) assignment to a wait‐list condition. Participants, 145 in Massachusetts and 170 in Nevada, reported their gambling behavior, beliefs and attitudes about chance, and recent and planned help seeking at baseline, 88% at 1 month later, and 79% at 3 months later. Findings for the complete and intent‐to‐treat analyses at both sites indicated that participants significantly improved. At the end of the study period, significantly more toolkit recipients than control group participants reported recently abstaining from gambling. Minimally invasive, self‐directed resources like this self‐help toolkit can assist remediating gambling‐related problems among gamblers who do not engage in formal treatment. ";"A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: A randomized multisite trial.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-10324-014";"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry";"LaBrie, 2012";"LaBrie_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_8_NA_cbt_wl_ma-t_wl"
"102";"LaBrie, 2012";"cbt";"wl";"ma-gt";"wl";-280586579654376;203676266744295;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";14,2;10,2;50;17,1;10,31;46;19;10;50;21;10;46;2012;"4";"post";"ind";"gsh";"us";"44";26;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"LaBrie, R. A., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Bernhard, B., Harper, A., Schrier, T., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 278-289.";"10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x";"Two studies conducted in Massachusetts and Nevada evaluated the efficacy of a self‐help toolkit for problem gambling. Individuals concerned about gambling‐related problems, in response to public notices and newspaper advertisements, volunteered for a randomized trial of the self‐help toolkit, Your First Step to Change: Gambling. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) a printed toolkit, (b) the toolkit and a brief guide to the toolkit’s content, or (c) assignment to a wait‐list condition. Participants, 145 in Massachusetts and 170 in Nevada, reported their gambling behavior, beliefs and attitudes about chance, and recent and planned help seeking at baseline, 88% at 1 month later, and 79% at 3 months later. Findings for the complete and intent‐to‐treat analyses at both sites indicated that participants significantly improved. At the end of the study period, significantly more toolkit recipients than control group participants reported recently abstaining from gambling. Minimally invasive, self‐directed resources like this self‐help toolkit can assist remediating gambling‐related problems among gamblers who do not engage in formal treatment. ";"A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: A randomized multisite trial.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-10324-014";"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry";"LaBrie, 2012";"LaBrie_2012_msd_global-freq_post_4_NA_cbt_wl_ma-gt_wl"
"103";"LaBrie, 2012";"cbt";"wl";"ma-gt";"wl";-329050105122697;204053675752273;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";12,9;11,1;50;16,4;9,92;46;19;10;50;21;10;46;2012;"8";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"us";"44";26;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"LaBrie, R. A., Peller, A. J., LaPlante, D. A., Bernhard, B., Harper, A., Schrier, T., & Shaffer, H. J. (2012). A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: a randomized multisite trial. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 82(2), 278-289.";"10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01157.x";"Two studies conducted in Massachusetts and Nevada evaluated the efficacy of a self‐help toolkit for problem gambling. Individuals concerned about gambling‐related problems, in response to public notices and newspaper advertisements, volunteered for a randomized trial of the self‐help toolkit, Your First Step to Change: Gambling. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: (a) a printed toolkit, (b) the toolkit and a brief guide to the toolkit’s content, or (c) assignment to a wait‐list condition. Participants, 145 in Massachusetts and 170 in Nevada, reported their gambling behavior, beliefs and attitudes about chance, and recent and planned help seeking at baseline, 88% at 1 month later, and 79% at 3 months later. Findings for the complete and intent‐to‐treat analyses at both sites indicated that participants significantly improved. At the end of the study period, significantly more toolkit recipients than control group participants reported recently abstaining from gambling. Minimally invasive, self‐directed resources like this self‐help toolkit can assist remediating gambling‐related problems among gamblers who do not engage in formal treatment. ";"A brief self-help toolkit intervention for gambling problems: A randomized multisite trial.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-10324-014";"American Journal of Orthopsychiatry";"LaBrie, 2012";"LaBrie_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_8_NA_cbt_wl_ma-gt_wl"
"104";"Ladouceur, 2001";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-265401837483631;341411191190517;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"dsm-iv";0,4;0,8;35;5,7;2,8;29;7,6;1,6;35;7,2;1,6;29;2001;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"42";17;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., Leblond, J., & Jacques, C. (2001). Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189(11), 774-780.";"10.1097/00005053-200111000-00007";"This study evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive treatment package for pathological gambling. Sixty-six gamblers, meeting DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling, were randomly assigned to treatment or wait-list control conditions. Cognitive correction techniques were used first to target gamblers' erroneous perceptions about randomness and then to address issues of relapse prevention. The dependent measures used were the South Oaks Gambling Screen, the number of DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling met by participants, as well as gamblers' perception of control, frequency of gambling, perceived self-efficacy, and desire to gamble. Posttest results indicated highly significant changes in the treatment group on all outcome measures, and analysis of data from 6- and 12-month follow-ups revealed maintenance of therapeutic gains. Recommendations for clinical interventions are discussed, focusing on the cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions toward the notion of randomness.";"Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling";"https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Fulltext/2001/11000/Cognitive_Treatment_of_Pathological_Gambling.7.aspx";"The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease";"Ladouceur, 2001";"Ladouceur_2001_msd_dsm-iv_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"105";"Ladouceur, 2001";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-732873456582666;256374587968511;"msd";"gambling";"duration";"global - duration";43;187;35;229;311;29;227;421;35;186;268;29;2001;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"42";17;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., Leblond, J., & Jacques, C. (2001). Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189(11), 774-780.";"10.1097/00005053-200111000-00007";"This study evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive treatment package for pathological gambling. Sixty-six gamblers, meeting DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling, were randomly assigned to treatment or wait-list control conditions. Cognitive correction techniques were used first to target gamblers' erroneous perceptions about randomness and then to address issues of relapse prevention. The dependent measures used were the South Oaks Gambling Screen, the number of DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling met by participants, as well as gamblers' perception of control, frequency of gambling, perceived self-efficacy, and desire to gamble. Posttest results indicated highly significant changes in the treatment group on all outcome measures, and analysis of data from 6- and 12-month follow-ups revealed maintenance of therapeutic gains. Recommendations for clinical interventions are discussed, focusing on the cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions toward the notion of randomness.";"Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling";"https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Fulltext/2001/11000/Cognitive_Treatment_of_Pathological_Gambling.7.aspx";"The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease";"Ladouceur, 2001";"Ladouceur_2001_msd_global-duration_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"106";"Ladouceur, 2001";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-597761041036765;253620498302659;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";0,5;1,4;35;1,8;2,8;29;1,8;2,9;35;1,1;1,2;29;2001;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"42";17;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., Leblond, J., & Jacques, C. (2001). Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189(11), 774-780.";"10.1097/00005053-200111000-00007";"This study evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive treatment package for pathological gambling. Sixty-six gamblers, meeting DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling, were randomly assigned to treatment or wait-list control conditions. Cognitive correction techniques were used first to target gamblers' erroneous perceptions about randomness and then to address issues of relapse prevention. The dependent measures used were the South Oaks Gambling Screen, the number of DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling met by participants, as well as gamblers' perception of control, frequency of gambling, perceived self-efficacy, and desire to gamble. Posttest results indicated highly significant changes in the treatment group on all outcome measures, and analysis of data from 6- and 12-month follow-ups revealed maintenance of therapeutic gains. Recommendations for clinical interventions are discussed, focusing on the cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions toward the notion of randomness.";"Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling";"https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Fulltext/2001/11000/Cognitive_Treatment_of_Pathological_Gambling.7.aspx";"The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease";"Ladouceur, 2001";"Ladouceur_2001_msd_global-freq_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"107";"Ladouceur, 2001";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-705788166697113;255780185023093;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";39;173;35;271;444;29;409;144;35;127;185;29;2001;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"42";17;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., Leblond, J., & Jacques, C. (2001). Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 189(11), 774-780.";"10.1097/00005053-200111000-00007";"This study evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive treatment package for pathological gambling. Sixty-six gamblers, meeting DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling, were randomly assigned to treatment or wait-list control conditions. Cognitive correction techniques were used first to target gamblers' erroneous perceptions about randomness and then to address issues of relapse prevention. The dependent measures used were the South Oaks Gambling Screen, the number of DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling met by participants, as well as gamblers' perception of control, frequency of gambling, perceived self-efficacy, and desire to gamble. Posttest results indicated highly significant changes in the treatment group on all outcome measures, and analysis of data from 6- and 12-month follow-ups revealed maintenance of therapeutic gains. Recommendations for clinical interventions are discussed, focusing on the cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions toward the notion of randomness.";"Cognitive treatment of pathological gambling";"https://journals.lww.com/jonmd/Fulltext/2001/11000/Cognitive_Treatment_of_Pathological_Gambling.7.aspx";"The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease";"Ladouceur, 2001";"Ladouceur_2001_msd_global-intensity_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"108";"Ladouceur, 2003";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-163709758929495;300502629681259;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"dsm-iv";1,56;2,32;34;6;3,1;25;7,26;1,48;34;8;1,38;25;2003;"12";"post";"grp";"grp";"can";"43.4";22;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Ladouceur, R., Sylvain, C., Boutin, C., Lachance, S., Doucet, C., & Leblond, J. (2003). Group therapy for pathological gamblers: A cognitive approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41(5), 587-596.";"10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00036-0";"This study evaluated the efficacy of a group cognitive treatment for pathological gambling. Gamblers, meeting DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling, were randomly assigned to treatment (N=34) or wait-list control (N=24) conditions. Cognitive correction techniques were used first to target gamblers’ erroneous perceptions about randomness, and then to address issues of relapse prevention. The dependent measures used were the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling, perceived self-efficacy, gamblers’ perception of control, desire to gamble, and frequency of gambling. Post-treatment results indicated that 88% of the treated gamblers no longer met the DSM-IV criteria for pathological gambling compared to only 20% in the control group. Similar changes were observed on all outcome measures. Analysis of data from 6-, 12- and 24-month follow-ups revealed maintenance of therapeutic gains. Recommendations for group interventions are discussed, focusing on the cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions toward the notion of randomness.";"Group therapy for pathological gamblers: a cognitive approach";"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796702000360";"Behaviour Research and Therapy";"Ladouceur, 2003";"Ladouceur_2003_msd_dsm-iv_post_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"109";"Larimer, 2012";"cbt";"ao";"cbt";"ao";-322764141488287;239174961031505;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";3,29;1,63;30;3,93;2,17;41;3,51;1,83;44;3,71;2,06;51;2012;"10";"follow up";"comb";"comb";"us";"21.23";35;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Larimer, M. E., Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Cronce, J. M., Kaysen, D., & Walker, D. D. (2012). Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: A randomized clinical trial. Addiction, 107(6), 1148-1158.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Aims: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of two promising approaches to indicated prevention of disordered gambling in a college population. Design: Randomized clinical trial with assignment to a personalized feedback intervention (PFI), cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI) or assessment-only control (AOC). PFI was delivered individually in a single session and included feedback regarding gambling behavior, norms, consequences and risk-reduction tips, delivered in a motivational interviewing style. CBI was delivered in small groups over four to six sessions and included functional analysis and brief cognitive correction, as well as identification of and alternatives for responding to gambling triggers. Setting: College campus. Participants: At-risk or probable pathological gamblers (n = 147; 65.3% male; group assignment: PFI, n = 52; CBI, n = 44; AOC, n = 51). Measurements: Self-reported gambling quantity, frequency, consequences, psychopathology, normative perceptions and beliefs. Findings: Relative to control, results at 6-month follow-up indicated reductions in both interventions for gambling consequences (PFI d = 0.48; CBI d = 0.39) and DSM-IV criteria (PFI d = 0.60; CBI d = 0.48), reductions in frequency for PFI (d = 0.48). CBI was associated with reduced illusions of control, whereas PFI was associated with reduced perceptions of gambling frequency norms. Reductions in perceived gambling frequency norms mediated effects of PFI on gambling frequency. Conclusions: A single-session personalized feedback intervention and a multi-session cognitive-behavioral intervention may be helpful in reducing disordered gambling in US college students.";"Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: a randomized clinical trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Addiction";"Larimer, 2012";"Larimer_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_10_NA_cbt_ao_cbt_ao"
"110";"Larimer, 2012";"mi";"ao";"mi";"ao";-0,251614100396634;0,221008501047673;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";3,38;2,16;40;3,93;2,17;41;3,86;1,98;52;3,71;2,06;51;2012;"10";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"21.23";35;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Larimer, M. E., Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Cronce, J. M., Kaysen, D., & Walker, D. D. (2012). Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: A randomized clinical trial. Addiction, 107(6), 1148-1158.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Aims: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of two promising approaches to indicated prevention of disordered gambling in a college population. Design: Randomized clinical trial with assignment to a personalized feedback intervention (PFI), cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI) or assessment-only control (AOC). PFI was delivered individually in a single session and included feedback regarding gambling behavior, norms, consequences and risk-reduction tips, delivered in a motivational interviewing style. CBI was delivered in small groups over four to six sessions and included functional analysis and brief cognitive correction, as well as identification of and alternatives for responding to gambling triggers. Setting: College campus. Participants: At-risk or probable pathological gamblers (n = 147; 65.3% male; group assignment: PFI, n = 52; CBI, n = 44; AOC, n = 51). Measurements: Self-reported gambling quantity, frequency, consequences, psychopathology, normative perceptions and beliefs. Findings: Relative to control, results at 6-month follow-up indicated reductions in both interventions for gambling consequences (PFI d = 0.48; CBI d = 0.39) and DSM-IV criteria (PFI d = 0.60; CBI d = 0.48), reductions in frequency for PFI (d = 0.48). CBI was associated with reduced illusions of control, whereas PFI was associated with reduced perceptions of gambling frequency norms. Reductions in perceived gambling frequency norms mediated effects of PFI on gambling frequency. Conclusions: A single-session personalized feedback intervention and a multi-session cognitive-behavioral intervention may be helpful in reducing disordered gambling in US college students.";"Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: a randomized clinical trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Addiction";"Larimer, 2012";"Larimer_2012_msd_global-freq_followup_10_NA_mi_ao_mi_ao"
"111";"Larimer, 2012";"cbt";"ao";"cbt";"ao";-340334541911183;239346423917464;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";-0,19;0,65;30;0,05;0,73;41;-0,15;0,57;44;-0,08;0,73;51;2012;"10";"follow up";"comb";"comb";"us";"21.23";35;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Larimer, M. E., Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Cronce, J. M., Kaysen, D., & Walker, D. D. (2012). Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: A randomized clinical trial. Addiction, 107(6), 1148-1158.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Aims: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of two promising approaches to indicated prevention of disordered gambling in a college population. Design: Randomized clinical trial with assignment to a personalized feedback intervention (PFI), cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI) or assessment-only control (AOC). PFI was delivered individually in a single session and included feedback regarding gambling behavior, norms, consequences and risk-reduction tips, delivered in a motivational interviewing style. CBI was delivered in small groups over four to six sessions and included functional analysis and brief cognitive correction, as well as identification of and alternatives for responding to gambling triggers. Setting: College campus. Participants: At-risk or probable pathological gamblers (n = 147; 65.3% male; group assignment: PFI, n = 52; CBI, n = 44; AOC, n = 51). Measurements: Self-reported gambling quantity, frequency, consequences, psychopathology, normative perceptions and beliefs. Findings: Relative to control, results at 6-month follow-up indicated reductions in both interventions for gambling consequences (PFI d = 0.48; CBI d = 0.39) and DSM-IV criteria (PFI d = 0.60; CBI d = 0.48), reductions in frequency for PFI (d = 0.48). CBI was associated with reduced illusions of control, whereas PFI was associated with reduced perceptions of gambling frequency norms. Reductions in perceived gambling frequency norms mediated effects of PFI on gambling frequency. Conclusions: A single-session personalized feedback intervention and a multi-session cognitive-behavioral intervention may be helpful in reducing disordered gambling in US college students.";"Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: a randomized clinical trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Addiction";"Larimer, 2012";"Larimer_2012_msd_global-intensity_followup_10_NA_cbt_ao_cbt_ao"
"112";"Larimer, 2012";"mi";"ao";"mi";"ao";0,043910310158616;0,220149628978033;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";0,09;1,05;40;0,05;0,73;41;0,2;1,04;52;-0,08;0,73;51;2012;"10";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"21.23";35;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Larimer, M. E., Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Cronce, J. M., Kaysen, D., & Walker, D. D. (2012). Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: A randomized clinical trial. Addiction, 107(6), 1148-1158.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Aims: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of two promising approaches to indicated prevention of disordered gambling in a college population. Design: Randomized clinical trial with assignment to a personalized feedback intervention (PFI), cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI) or assessment-only control (AOC). PFI was delivered individually in a single session and included feedback regarding gambling behavior, norms, consequences and risk-reduction tips, delivered in a motivational interviewing style. CBI was delivered in small groups over four to six sessions and included functional analysis and brief cognitive correction, as well as identification of and alternatives for responding to gambling triggers. Setting: College campus. Participants: At-risk or probable pathological gamblers (n = 147; 65.3% male; group assignment: PFI, n = 52; CBI, n = 44; AOC, n = 51). Measurements: Self-reported gambling quantity, frequency, consequences, psychopathology, normative perceptions and beliefs. Findings: Relative to control, results at 6-month follow-up indicated reductions in both interventions for gambling consequences (PFI d = 0.48; CBI d = 0.39) and DSM-IV criteria (PFI d = 0.60; CBI d = 0.48), reductions in frequency for PFI (d = 0.48). CBI was associated with reduced illusions of control, whereas PFI was associated with reduced perceptions of gambling frequency norms. Reductions in perceived gambling frequency norms mediated effects of PFI on gambling frequency. Conclusions: A single-session personalized feedback intervention and a multi-session cognitive-behavioral intervention may be helpful in reducing disordered gambling in US college students.";"Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: a randomized clinical trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Addiction";"Larimer, 2012";"Larimer_2012_msd_global-intensity_followup_10_NA_mi_ao_mi_ao"
"113";"Larimer, 2012";"cbt";"ao";"cbt";"ao";-530771864156041;241774602321511;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"nods";1,53;1,14;30;2,26;1,5;41;1,93;1,19;44;2,24;1,9;51;2012;"10";"follow up";"comb";"comb";"us";"21.23";35;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Larimer, M. E., Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Cronce, J. M., Kaysen, D., & Walker, D. D. (2012). Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: A randomized clinical trial. Addiction, 107(6), 1148-1158.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Aims: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of two promising approaches to indicated prevention of disordered gambling in a college population. Design: Randomized clinical trial with assignment to a personalized feedback intervention (PFI), cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI) or assessment-only control (AOC). PFI was delivered individually in a single session and included feedback regarding gambling behavior, norms, consequences and risk-reduction tips, delivered in a motivational interviewing style. CBI was delivered in small groups over four to six sessions and included functional analysis and brief cognitive correction, as well as identification of and alternatives for responding to gambling triggers. Setting: College campus. Participants: At-risk or probable pathological gamblers (n = 147; 65.3% male; group assignment: PFI, n = 52; CBI, n = 44; AOC, n = 51). Measurements: Self-reported gambling quantity, frequency, consequences, psychopathology, normative perceptions and beliefs. Findings: Relative to control, results at 6-month follow-up indicated reductions in both interventions for gambling consequences (PFI d = 0.48; CBI d = 0.39) and DSM-IV criteria (PFI d = 0.60; CBI d = 0.48), reductions in frequency for PFI (d = 0.48). CBI was associated with reduced illusions of control, whereas PFI was associated with reduced perceptions of gambling frequency norms. Reductions in perceived gambling frequency norms mediated effects of PFI on gambling frequency. Conclusions: A single-session personalized feedback intervention and a multi-session cognitive-behavioral intervention may be helpful in reducing disordered gambling in US college students.";"Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: a randomized clinical trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Addiction";"Larimer, 2012";"Larimer_2012_msd_nods_followup_10_NA_cbt_ao_cbt_ao"
"114";"Larimer, 2012";"mi";"ao";"mi";"ao";-0,432417219639871;0,222728946117396;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"nods";2,58;5,95;40;5,4;6,92;41;2,52;1,75;52;2,24;1,9;51;2012;"10";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"21.23";35;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Larimer, M. E., Neighbors, C., Lostutter, T. W., Whiteside, U., Cronce, J. M., Kaysen, D., & Walker, D. D. (2012). Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: A randomized clinical trial. Addiction, 107(6), 1148-1158.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Aims: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate feasibility and efficacy of two promising approaches to indicated prevention of disordered gambling in a college population. Design: Randomized clinical trial with assignment to a personalized feedback intervention (PFI), cognitive-behavioral intervention (CBI) or assessment-only control (AOC). PFI was delivered individually in a single session and included feedback regarding gambling behavior, norms, consequences and risk-reduction tips, delivered in a motivational interviewing style. CBI was delivered in small groups over four to six sessions and included functional analysis and brief cognitive correction, as well as identification of and alternatives for responding to gambling triggers. Setting: College campus. Participants: At-risk or probable pathological gamblers (n = 147; 65.3% male; group assignment: PFI, n = 52; CBI, n = 44; AOC, n = 51). Measurements: Self-reported gambling quantity, frequency, consequences, psychopathology, normative perceptions and beliefs. Findings: Relative to control, results at 6-month follow-up indicated reductions in both interventions for gambling consequences (PFI d = 0.48; CBI d = 0.39) and DSM-IV criteria (PFI d = 0.60; CBI d = 0.48), reductions in frequency for PFI (d = 0.48). CBI was associated with reduced illusions of control, whereas PFI was associated with reduced perceptions of gambling frequency norms. Reductions in perceived gambling frequency norms mediated effects of PFI on gambling frequency. Conclusions: A single-session personalized feedback intervention and a multi-session cognitive-behavioral intervention may be helpful in reducing disordered gambling in US college students.";"Brief motivational feedback and cognitive behavioral interventions for prevention of disordered gambling: a randomized clinical trial";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03776.x";"Addiction";"Larimer, 2012";"Larimer_2012_msd_nods_followup_10_NA_mi_ao_mi_ao"
"115";"Lee, 2015";"other psy";"cau";"NA";"NA";-1,45750547061935;0,538382896304138;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gsas";0,91;0,63;8;2,02;0,8;8;1,7;0,81;8;2,36;0,6;8;2015;"12";"post";"cpl";"cpl";"can";"49.3";34;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Lee, B. K., & Awosoga, O. (2015). Congruence couple therapy for pathological gambling: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 1047-1068.";"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9464-3";"A multi-site pilot randomized controlled trial of Congruence Couple Therapy (CCT) for problem gambling was conducted in Ontario and Alberta, Canada from 2009 to 2011. The purpose was to assess the feasibility of a full trial and to identify methodological modifications to enhance future trials. The sample (N = 30; 15 couples) consisted of 66 % male gamblers and 34 % female. Mean age of sample was 49.1 years. Baseline mean DSM-IV gambling score was 8.7/10. Retention of the treatment couples was 89 % at 2-month follow-up. Retention of control couples was 78 %. A randomized controlled design compared the status of couples in treatment condition to control condition. Treatment couples received 12-week CCT while control couples received three brief check-ins over 12 weeks. No significant difference was found between treatment and control group at baseline on all measures. At (1) week 12 post-treatment, and (2) week 20 follow-up, significant treatment effects were found for gambling symptoms (p = 0.008; p = 0.041), mental distress (p = 0.001; p = 0.035), and family systems function (p = 0.023; p = 0.054) between treatment and control group. Within group changes for treatment couples over time were significant for mental distress (p = 0.000), dyadic adjustment (p = 0.002), and family systems function (p = 0.000). On similar measures, control group showed non-significant improvement. Future methodological changes, advantages and disadvantages of multi-site partnerships with community treatment agencies are discussed. Of interest is that control participants showed unintended improvement. CCT as a treatment was favourably accepted by counselors, problem gamblers and their spouses. Positive outcome trends ranging from small to large effect size on key measures indicate that a full-scaled trial will require approximately 140 couples and is an investment worth pursuing.";"Congruence Couple Therapy for Pathological Gambling: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-014-9464-3";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Lee, 2015";"Lee_2015_msd_gsas_post_12_NA_otherpsy_cau_NA_NA"
"116";"Lee, 2015";"other psy";"cau";"NA";"NA";-1,06163910080961;0,508617979201149;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gsas";1,09;0,88;8;2,19;1,07;8;1,7;0,81;8;2,36;0,6;8;2015;"8";"follow up";"cpl";"cpl";"can";"49.3";34;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Lee, B. K., & Awosoga, O. (2015). Congruence couple therapy for pathological gambling: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31, 1047-1068.";"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-014-9464-3";"A multi-site pilot randomized controlled trial of Congruence Couple Therapy (CCT) for problem gambling was conducted in Ontario and Alberta, Canada from 2009 to 2011. The purpose was to assess the feasibility of a full trial and to identify methodological modifications to enhance future trials. The sample (N = 30; 15 couples) consisted of 66 % male gamblers and 34 % female. Mean age of sample was 49.1 years. Baseline mean DSM-IV gambling score was 8.7/10. Retention of the treatment couples was 89 % at 2-month follow-up. Retention of control couples was 78 %. A randomized controlled design compared the status of couples in treatment condition to control condition. Treatment couples received 12-week CCT while control couples received three brief check-ins over 12 weeks. No significant difference was found between treatment and control group at baseline on all measures. At (1) week 12 post-treatment, and (2) week 20 follow-up, significant treatment effects were found for gambling symptoms (p = 0.008; p = 0.041), mental distress (p = 0.001; p = 0.035), and family systems function (p = 0.023; p = 0.054) between treatment and control group. Within group changes for treatment couples over time were significant for mental distress (p = 0.000), dyadic adjustment (p = 0.002), and family systems function (p = 0.000). On similar measures, control group showed non-significant improvement. Future methodological changes, advantages and disadvantages of multi-site partnerships with community treatment agencies are discussed. Of interest is that control participants showed unintended improvement. CCT as a treatment was favourably accepted by counselors, problem gamblers and their spouses. Positive outcome trends ranging from small to large effect size on key measures indicate that a full-scaled trial will require approximately 140 couples and is an investment worth pursuing.";"Congruence Couple Therapy for Pathological Gambling: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-014-9464-3";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Lee, 2015";"Lee_2015_msd_gsas_followup_8_NA_otherpsy_cau_NA_NA"
"117";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"gsh";"wl";0,808788083730701;0,298772349888913;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"pgsi";10,29;6,45;14;6,65;3,93;65;8,69;4,32;301;8,63;4,48;264;2016;"6";"post";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_pgsi_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_gsh_wl"
"118";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"gsh";"wl";-0,385744908793951;0,37987727634496;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"pgsi";5,25;3,11;8;7,18;5,16;45;8,69;4,32;301;8,63;4,48;264;2016;"12";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_pgsi_followup_12_NA_cbt_wl_gsh_wl"
"119";"Luquiens, 2016";"pfi";"wl";"pfi";"wl";0,164017024235255;0,17467820804026;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"pgsi";7,34;4,42;65;6,65;3,93;65;9,32;4,95;293;8,63;4,48;264;2016;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_pgsi_post_6_NA_pfi_wl_pfi_wl"
"120";"Luquiens, 2016";"pfi";"wl";"pfi";"wl";-0,295368241192354;0,215147803529811;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"pgsi";5,85;3,54;41;7,18;5,16;45;9,32;4,95;293;8,63;4,48;264;2016;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_pgsi_followup_12_NA_pfi_wl_pfi_wl"
"121";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"ush";"wl";0,169280065774747;0,194189823814055;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"pgsi";7,45;5,64;44;6,65;3,93;65;9,42;5,08;264;8,63;4,48;264;2016;"6";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_pgsi_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_ush_wl"
"122";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"ush";"wl";-0,258438390505356;0,271234829248446;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"pgsi";5,89;4,32;19;7,18;5,16;45;9,42;5,08;264;8,63;4,48;264;2016;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ush";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_pgsi_followup_12_NA_cbt_wl_ush_wl"
"123";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"gsh";"wl";-0,0694497803231165;0,0842345949755004;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"player - freq";58,44;73,17;301;63,42;69,79;264;57,75;73,76;301;68,6;75,89;264;2016;"6";"post";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_gsh_wl"
"124";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"gsh";"wl";-0,0845483698452764;0,0842468079505194;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"player - freq";51,17;66,97;301;57,02;71,45;264;57,75;73,76;301;68,6;75,89;264;2016;"12";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-freq_followup_12_NA_cbt_wl_gsh_wl"
"125";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"ush";"wl";-0,228510710577022;0,087198663418346;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"player - freq";48,2;63,06;264;63,42;69,79;264;57,45;78,33;264;68,6;75,89;264;2016;"6";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_ush_wl"
"126";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"ush";"wl";-0,119276178392731;0,0869921329947259;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"player - freq";48,59;69,69;264;57,02;71,45;264;57,45;78,33;264;68,6;75,89;264;2016;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ush";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-freq_followup_12_NA_cbt_wl_ush_wl"
"127";"Luquiens, 2016";"pfi";"wl";"pfi";"wl";-0,0616640230988575;0,0847632234090958;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"player - freq";58,84;77,91;293;63,42;69,79;264;63,69;85,46;293;68,6;75,89;264;2016;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-freq_post_6_NA_pfi_wl_pfi_wl"
"128";"Luquiens, 2016";"pfi";"wl";"pfi";"wl";0,0201100550607821;0,0847452284190718;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"player - freq";58,66;89,49;293;57,02;71,45;264;63,69;85,46;293;68,6;75,89;264;2016;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-freq_followup_12_NA_pfi_wl_pfi_wl"
"129";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"gsh";"wl";0,0171599440823149;0,0842108021320633;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"player - intensity";1572;5475;301;1488;4119;264;1171,63;2919,44;301;1565,95;4244,16;264;2016;"6";"post";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-intensity_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_gsh_wl"
"130";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"gsh";"wl";0,00492029288720607;0,0842093820933317;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"player - intensity";1742;9223;301;1698;8585;264;1171,63;2919,44;301;1565,95;4244,16;264;2016;"12";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-intensity_followup_12_NA_cbt_wl_gsh_wl"
"131";"Luquiens, 2016";"pfi";"wl";"pfi";"wl";0,0407102159632812;0,0847518638864812;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"player - intensity";1705;6211;293;1488;4119;264;1858,78;5140,84;293;1565,95;4244,16;264;2016;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-intensity_post_6_NA_pfi_wl_pfi_wl"
"132";"Luquiens, 2016";"pfi";"wl";"pfi";"wl";-0,02426048276307;0,0847462037558608;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"player - intensity";1533;4615;293;1698;8585;264;1858,78;5140,84;293;1565,95;4244,16;264;2016;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-intensity_followup_12_NA_pfi_wl_pfi_wl"
"133";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"ush";"wl";0,127348292475502;0,0870029678351493;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"player - intensity";3002;16276;264;1488;4119;264;2413,49;8872,57;264;1565,95;4244,16;264;2016;"6";"post";"ind";"ush";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-intensity_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_ush_wl"
"134";"Luquiens, 2016";"cbt";"wl";"ush";"wl";0,0714251862276058;0,0869424514734557;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"player - intensity";2389;10628;264;1698;8585;264;2413,49;8872,57;264;1565,95;4244,16;264;2016;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ush";"eu";"34.700000000000003";8;0;0;1;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Luquiens, A., Tanguy, M. L., Lagadec, M., Benyamina, A., Aubin, H. J., & Reynaud, M. (2016). The efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapy for non–treatment-seeking online problem gamblers: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 18(2), e36.";"https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4752";"Background: Internet-based interventions targeted at the most at-risk gamblers could reduce the treatment gap for addictive disorders. Currently, no clinical trial has included non–treatment-seeking patients who have been recruited directly in their gambling environment. This study was the first exclusively Internet-based randomized controlled trial among non–help-seeking problem gamblers with naturalistic recruitment in their gambling environment. Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of three modalities of Internet-based psychotherapies with or without guidance, compared to a control condition, among problem gamblers who play online poker. Methods: All active poker gamblers on the Winamax website were systematically offered screening. All problem poker gamblers identified with a Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) score of ≥5 were eligible to be included in the trial. Problem gamblers were randomized into four groups: (1) waiting list (control group), (2) personalized normalized feedback on their gambling status by email, (3) an email containing a self-help book to be downloaded with a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) program without guidance, and (4) the same CBT program emailed weekly by a trained psychologist with personalized guidance. Efficacy was assessed based on the change in PGSI between baseline and 6 weeks (end of treatment) or 12 weeks (maintenance) and supported by player account-based gambling data automatically collected at the three time points. Results: All groups met high attrition rates (83%), but the group with guidance had a significantly higher dropout rate than the other three groups, including the control group. Although all groups showed some improvement, with a mean decrease of 1.35 on the PGSI, no significant difference in efficacy between the groups was observed. One-third of the problem gamblers fell below the problem gambling threshold at 6 weeks. Conclusions: Guidance could have aversively affected problem gamblers who had not sought help. Despite the lack of significant difference in efficacy between groups, this naturalistic trial provides a basis for the development of future Internet-based trials in individuals with gambling disorders. Comorbidities, natural course of illness, and intrinsic motivation seem to be critical issues to consider in future designs.";"The Efficacy of Three Modalities of Internet-Based Psychotherapy for Non–Treatment-Seeking Online Problem Gamblers: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.jmir.org/2016/2/e36/";"Journal of Medical Internet Research";"Luquiens, 2016";"Luquiens_2016_msd_player-intensity_followup_12_NA_cbt_wl_ush_wl"
"135";"Marceaux, 2011";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-329389305790606;663699905435417;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"dsm-iv";1,07;1,16;15;6,71;2,43;7;7,17;1,29;18;7,22;2,22;9;2011;"8";"post";"grp";"grp";"us";"49";62;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Marceaux, J. C., & Melville, C. L. (2011). Twelve-step facilitated versus mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gambling: A controlled study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(1), 171-190.";"10.1007/s10899-010-9196-y";"This study examined the efficacy of two group treatments for pathological gambling, a node-link mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT-mapping) and twelve-step facilitated (TSF) group treatment. Forty-nine participants meeting criteria for pathological gambling were recruited from local newspaper advertisements. These participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: TSF (n = 11), CBGT-mapping (n = 18), and Wait-List control (n = 9); 11 refused treatment prior to randomization. Outcome measures included number of DSM-IV criteria met, perception of control/self-efficacy, desire to gamble, and frequency of gambling episodes. Analyses revealed a significant treatment group × time interaction (η²partial = .39). Specifically, the group treatments resulted in significant improvements in the dependent measures, while the Wait-List group remained relatively stable. Overall, CBGT-mapping and TSF had no significant differences on any outcome measure at follow-up assessments. Analysis of post-treatment and 6-month follow-up reveal a significant improvement in gambling outcomes (i.e., fewer DSM-IV criteria met, greater self-efficacy, and fewer gambling episodes (η²partial = .35), with treatment gains maintained at 6 months. These results are consistent with previous research for group treatment for pathological gambling and provide support for the utility of TSF and a mapping-based CBT therapy as viable intervention for pathological gambling.";"Twelve-Step Facilitated Versus Mapping-Enhanced Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pathological Gambling: A Controlled Study";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-010-9196-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Marceaux, 2011";"Marceaux_2011_msd_dsm-iv_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"136";"Marceaux, 2011";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-138825543376814;487559192428892;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";0,67;1,29;15;3,56;3,08;7;5,72;4,91;18;4,11;2,67;9;2011;"8";"post";"grp";"grp";"us";"49";62;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Marceaux, J. C., & Melville, C. L. (2011). Twelve-step facilitated versus mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gambling: A controlled study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(1), 171-190.";"10.1007/s10899-010-9196-y";"This study examined the efficacy of two group treatments for pathological gambling, a node-link mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT-mapping) and twelve-step facilitated (TSF) group treatment. Forty-nine participants meeting criteria for pathological gambling were recruited from local newspaper advertisements. These participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: TSF (n = 11), CBGT-mapping (n = 18), and Wait-List control (n = 9); 11 refused treatment prior to randomization. Outcome measures included number of DSM-IV criteria met, perception of control/self-efficacy, desire to gamble, and frequency of gambling episodes. Analyses revealed a significant treatment group × time interaction (η²partial = .39). Specifically, the group treatments resulted in significant improvements in the dependent measures, while the Wait-List group remained relatively stable. Overall, CBGT-mapping and TSF had no significant differences on any outcome measure at follow-up assessments. Analysis of post-treatment and 6-month follow-up reveal a significant improvement in gambling outcomes (i.e., fewer DSM-IV criteria met, greater self-efficacy, and fewer gambling episodes (η²partial = .35), with treatment gains maintained at 6 months. These results are consistent with previous research for group treatment for pathological gambling and provide support for the utility of TSF and a mapping-based CBT therapy as viable intervention for pathological gambling.";"Twelve-Step Facilitated Versus Mapping-Enhanced Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pathological Gambling: A Controlled Study";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-010-9196-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Marceaux, 2011";"Marceaux_2011_msd_tlfb-freq_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"137";"Marceaux, 2011";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-515481963340374;447159799952247;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";306,33;963,37;15;802,14;829,75;7;1548,17;1585,7;18;1056,67;1079,9;9;2011;"8";"post";"grp";"grp";"us";"49";62;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Marceaux, J. C., & Melville, C. L. (2011). Twelve-step facilitated versus mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gambling: A controlled study. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(1), 171-190.";"10.1007/s10899-010-9196-y";"This study examined the efficacy of two group treatments for pathological gambling, a node-link mapping-enhanced cognitive-behavioral group therapy (CBGT-mapping) and twelve-step facilitated (TSF) group treatment. Forty-nine participants meeting criteria for pathological gambling were recruited from local newspaper advertisements. These participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: TSF (n = 11), CBGT-mapping (n = 18), and Wait-List control (n = 9); 11 refused treatment prior to randomization. Outcome measures included number of DSM-IV criteria met, perception of control/self-efficacy, desire to gamble, and frequency of gambling episodes. Analyses revealed a significant treatment group × time interaction (η²partial = .39). Specifically, the group treatments resulted in significant improvements in the dependent measures, while the Wait-List group remained relatively stable. Overall, CBGT-mapping and TSF had no significant differences on any outcome measure at follow-up assessments. Analysis of post-treatment and 6-month follow-up reveal a significant improvement in gambling outcomes (i.e., fewer DSM-IV criteria met, greater self-efficacy, and fewer gambling episodes (η²partial = .35), with treatment gains maintained at 6 months. These results are consistent with previous research for group treatment for pathological gambling and provide support for the utility of TSF and a mapping-based CBT therapy as viable intervention for pathological gambling.";"Twelve-Step Facilitated Versus Mapping-Enhanced Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Pathological Gambling: A Controlled Study";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-010-9196-y";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Marceaux, 2011";"Marceaux_2011_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_8_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"138";"Martens, 2015";"pfi";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,320804376399499;0,136181066306678;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"cpgi";1,79;2,8;110;2,8;3,45;107;3,23;3,43;111;3,05;2,69;109;2015;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"21.8";40;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Martens, M. P., Arterberry, B. J., Takamatsu, S. K., Masters, J., & Dude, K. (2015). The efficacy of a personalized feedback-only intervention for at-risk college gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 494–499.";"10.1037/a0038843";"Objective: College students have been shown to be at higher risk than the general adult population for gambling-related problems. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of a personalized feedback only intervention (PFB) among at-risk college student gamblers. Method: Three hundred thirty-three college students who met screening criteria were randomized into 1 of 3 conditions: PFB, education only (EDU), or assessment only (AO). Results: At 3-month follow-up, individuals in the PFB condition reported fewer dollars gambled and fewer gambling-related problems than those in the AO condition. There were no differences between those in the EDU and the AO conditions, or between those in the PFB and the EDU conditions. Conclusion: These findings are consistent with clinical trials examining other health behaviors, and have implications for the development and delivery of effective intervention programming for at-risk gamblers.";"The efficacy of a personalized feedback-only intervention for at-risk college gamblers";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-05391-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Martens, 2015";"Martens_2015_msd_cpgi_post_12_NA_pfi_ao_NA_NA"
"139";"Martens, 2015";"pfi";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,0346140887730245;0,135317815279442;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";3,45;3,42;110;3,57;3,49;107;6,29;4,94;111;5,21;3,46;109;2015;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"21.8";40;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Martens, M. P., Arterberry, B. J., Takamatsu, S. K., Masters, J., & Dude, K. (2015). The efficacy of a personalized feedback-only intervention for at-risk college gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 494–499.";"10.1037/a0038843";"Objective: College students have been shown to be at higher risk than the general adult population for gambling-related problems. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of a personalized feedback only intervention (PFB) among at-risk college student gamblers. Method: Three hundred thirty-three college students who met screening criteria were randomized into 1 of 3 conditions: PFB, education only (EDU), or assessment only (AO). Results: At 3-month follow-up, individuals in the PFB condition reported fewer dollars gambled and fewer gambling-related problems than those in the AO condition. There were no differences between those in the EDU and the AO conditions, or between those in the PFB and the EDU conditions. Conclusion: These findings are consistent with clinical trials examining other health behaviors, and have implications for the development and delivery of effective intervention programming for at-risk gamblers.";"The efficacy of a personalized feedback-only intervention for at-risk college gamblers";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-05391-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Martens, 2015";"Martens_2015_msd_tlfb-freq_post_12_NA_pfi_ao_NA_NA"
"140";"Martens, 2015";"pfi";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,206430644697548;0,135669961656559;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";122,88;259,59;110;209,42;533,56;107;200,31;280,43;111;220,6;362,04;109;2015;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"21.8";40;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Martens, M. P., Arterberry, B. J., Takamatsu, S. K., Masters, J., & Dude, K. (2015). The efficacy of a personalized feedback-only intervention for at-risk college gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 494–499.";"10.1037/a0038843";"Objective: College students have been shown to be at higher risk than the general adult population for gambling-related problems. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of a personalized feedback only intervention (PFB) among at-risk college student gamblers. Method: Three hundred thirty-three college students who met screening criteria were randomized into 1 of 3 conditions: PFB, education only (EDU), or assessment only (AO). Results: At 3-month follow-up, individuals in the PFB condition reported fewer dollars gambled and fewer gambling-related problems than those in the AO condition. There were no differences between those in the EDU and the AO conditions, or between those in the PFB and the EDU conditions. Conclusion: These findings are consistent with clinical trials examining other health behaviors, and have implications for the development and delivery of effective intervention programming for at-risk gamblers.";"The efficacy of a personalized feedback-only intervention for at-risk college gamblers";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-05391-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Martens, 2015";"Martens_2015_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_12_NA_pfi_ao_NA_NA"
"141";"McAfee, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"text";"ao";-0,143031600870622;0,152013139165064;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"cpgi";2,28;2,73;80;2,7;3,08;93;4,34;3,11;86;3,97;3,24;96;2020;"20";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"22.2";38;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"McAfee, N. W., Martens, M. P., Herring, T. E., Takamatsu, S. K., & Foss, J. M. (2020). The efficacy of personalized feedback interventions delivered via smartphone among at-risk college student gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 45.";"10.4309/jgi.2020.45.3";"At-risk gambling is a public health problem that college students engage in at a disproportionate level compared to the general adult population. Brief interventions that incorporate personalized feedback have been efficacious at reducing gambling and related problems. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of personalized feedback-based interventions delivered via smartphone and text message. Participants were 255 students who met our screening criteria for ‘‘problem’’ or ‘‘pathological’’ gambling, and were randomized to one of three conditions: personalized feedback and follow-up targeted text messages (PFB-TXT); personalized feedback and follow-up educational information about gambling (PFB-EDU); and a control condition that received no personalized feedback or follow-up text messages. Dependent variables included percent days abstinent (PDA) from gambling, average amount wagered on a gambling day, and gambling-related problems. Results indicated that the PFB conditions did not have a direct effect relative to the control condition on the dependent variables at the six-month follow-up, but a statistically significant mediated effect on gambling-related problems via gambling norms did emerge at one-month. No differences between the two PFB conditions in terms of direct or indirect effects on the six-month outcome variables were determined. Findings from this study suggest that the personalized text condition did not provide greater efficacy in changing gambling-related outcomes over general educational messages with personalized feedback. To help explain the lack of direct intervention effects, we explored two hypotheses related to our study design and sample of gamblers.";"The Efficacy of Personalized Feedback Interventions Delivered via Smartphone among At-Risk College Student Gamblers";"https://cdspress.ca/?p=8732";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"McAfee, 2020";"McAfee_2020_msd_cpgi_followup_20_NA_pfi_ao_text_ao"
"142";"McAfee, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"text";"ao";-0,0537423055131938;0,151234877595729;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"cpgi";2,87;3,38;82;3,06;3,64;92;4,34;3,11;86;3,97;3,24;96;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"22.2";38;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"McAfee, N. W., Martens, M. P., Herring, T. E., Takamatsu, S. K., & Foss, J. M. (2020). The efficacy of personalized feedback interventions delivered via smartphone among at-risk college student gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 45.";"10.4309/jgi.2020.45.3";"At-risk gambling is a public health problem that college students engage in at a disproportionate level compared to the general adult population. Brief interventions that incorporate personalized feedback have been efficacious at reducing gambling and related problems. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of personalized feedback-based interventions delivered via smartphone and text message. Participants were 255 students who met our screening criteria for ‘‘problem’’ or ‘‘pathological’’ gambling, and were randomized to one of three conditions: personalized feedback and follow-up targeted text messages (PFB-TXT); personalized feedback and follow-up educational information about gambling (PFB-EDU); and a control condition that received no personalized feedback or follow-up text messages. Dependent variables included percent days abstinent (PDA) from gambling, average amount wagered on a gambling day, and gambling-related problems. Results indicated that the PFB conditions did not have a direct effect relative to the control condition on the dependent variables at the six-month follow-up, but a statistically significant mediated effect on gambling-related problems via gambling norms did emerge at one-month. No differences between the two PFB conditions in terms of direct or indirect effects on the six-month outcome variables were determined. Findings from this study suggest that the personalized text condition did not provide greater efficacy in changing gambling-related outcomes over general educational messages with personalized feedback. To help explain the lack of direct intervention effects, we explored two hypotheses related to our study design and sample of gamblers.";"The Efficacy of Personalized Feedback Interventions Delivered via Smartphone among At-Risk College Student Gamblers";"https://cdspress.ca/?p=8732";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"McAfee, 2020";"McAfee_2020_msd_cpgi_post_4_NA_pfi_ao_text_ao"
"143";"McAfee, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"edu";"ao";0,0268518271607221;0,158810656234427;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"cpgi";2,78;2,8;68;2,7;3,08;93;5,27;4,62;73;3,97;3,24;96;2020;"20";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"22.2";38;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"McAfee, N. W., Martens, M. P., Herring, T. E., Takamatsu, S. K., & Foss, J. M. (2020). The efficacy of personalized feedback interventions delivered via smartphone among at-risk college student gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 45.";"10.4309/jgi.2020.45.3";"At-risk gambling is a public health problem that college students engage in at a disproportionate level compared to the general adult population. Brief interventions that incorporate personalized feedback have been efficacious at reducing gambling and related problems. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of personalized feedback-based interventions delivered via smartphone and text message. Participants were 255 students who met our screening criteria for ‘‘problem’’ or ‘‘pathological’’ gambling, and were randomized to one of three conditions: personalized feedback and follow-up targeted text messages (PFB-TXT); personalized feedback and follow-up educational information about gambling (PFB-EDU); and a control condition that received no personalized feedback or follow-up text messages. Dependent variables included percent days abstinent (PDA) from gambling, average amount wagered on a gambling day, and gambling-related problems. Results indicated that the PFB conditions did not have a direct effect relative to the control condition on the dependent variables at the six-month follow-up, but a statistically significant mediated effect on gambling-related problems via gambling norms did emerge at one-month. No differences between the two PFB conditions in terms of direct or indirect effects on the six-month outcome variables were determined. Findings from this study suggest that the personalized text condition did not provide greater efficacy in changing gambling-related outcomes over general educational messages with personalized feedback. To help explain the lack of direct intervention effects, we explored two hypotheses related to our study design and sample of gamblers.";"The Efficacy of Personalized Feedback Interventions Delivered via Smartphone among At-Risk College Student Gamblers";"https://cdspress.ca/?p=8732";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"McAfee, 2020";"McAfee_2020_msd_cpgi_followup_20_NA_pfi_ao_edu_ao"
"144";"McAfee, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"edu";"ao";0,180866594425507;0,159483739815426;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"cpgi";3,75;4;68;3,06;3,64;92;5,27;4,62;73;3,97;3,24;96;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"22.2";38;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"McAfee, N. W., Martens, M. P., Herring, T. E., Takamatsu, S. K., & Foss, J. M. (2020). The efficacy of personalized feedback interventions delivered via smartphone among at-risk college student gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 45.";"10.4309/jgi.2020.45.3";"At-risk gambling is a public health problem that college students engage in at a disproportionate level compared to the general adult population. Brief interventions that incorporate personalized feedback have been efficacious at reducing gambling and related problems. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of personalized feedback-based interventions delivered via smartphone and text message. Participants were 255 students who met our screening criteria for ‘‘problem’’ or ‘‘pathological’’ gambling, and were randomized to one of three conditions: personalized feedback and follow-up targeted text messages (PFB-TXT); personalized feedback and follow-up educational information about gambling (PFB-EDU); and a control condition that received no personalized feedback or follow-up text messages. Dependent variables included percent days abstinent (PDA) from gambling, average amount wagered on a gambling day, and gambling-related problems. Results indicated that the PFB conditions did not have a direct effect relative to the control condition on the dependent variables at the six-month follow-up, but a statistically significant mediated effect on gambling-related problems via gambling norms did emerge at one-month. No differences between the two PFB conditions in terms of direct or indirect effects on the six-month outcome variables were determined. Findings from this study suggest that the personalized text condition did not provide greater efficacy in changing gambling-related outcomes over general educational messages with personalized feedback. To help explain the lack of direct intervention effects, we explored two hypotheses related to our study design and sample of gamblers.";"The Efficacy of Personalized Feedback Interventions Delivered via Smartphone among At-Risk College Student Gamblers";"https://cdspress.ca/?p=8732";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"McAfee, 2020";"McAfee_2020_msd_cpgi_post_4_NA_pfi_ao_edu_ao"
"145";"McAfee, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"text";"ao";-0,0201380044061463;0,151822393860674;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";29,08;40,93;80;29,93;42,94;93;45,38;60,21;86;34,83;36,44;96;2020;"20";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"22.2";38;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"McAfee, N. W., Martens, M. P., Herring, T. E., Takamatsu, S. K., & Foss, J. M. (2020). The efficacy of personalized feedback interventions delivered via smartphone among at-risk college student gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 45.";"10.4309/jgi.2020.45.3";"At-risk gambling is a public health problem that college students engage in at a disproportionate level compared to the general adult population. Brief interventions that incorporate personalized feedback have been efficacious at reducing gambling and related problems. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of personalized feedback-based interventions delivered via smartphone and text message. Participants were 255 students who met our screening criteria for ‘‘problem’’ or ‘‘pathological’’ gambling, and were randomized to one of three conditions: personalized feedback and follow-up targeted text messages (PFB-TXT); personalized feedback and follow-up educational information about gambling (PFB-EDU); and a control condition that received no personalized feedback or follow-up text messages. Dependent variables included percent days abstinent (PDA) from gambling, average amount wagered on a gambling day, and gambling-related problems. Results indicated that the PFB conditions did not have a direct effect relative to the control condition on the dependent variables at the six-month follow-up, but a statistically significant mediated effect on gambling-related problems via gambling norms did emerge at one-month. No differences between the two PFB conditions in terms of direct or indirect effects on the six-month outcome variables were determined. Findings from this study suggest that the personalized text condition did not provide greater efficacy in changing gambling-related outcomes over general educational messages with personalized feedback. To help explain the lack of direct intervention effects, we explored two hypotheses related to our study design and sample of gamblers.";"The Efficacy of Personalized Feedback Interventions Delivered via Smartphone among At-Risk College Student Gamblers";"https://cdspress.ca/?p=8732";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"McAfee, 2020";"McAfee_2020_msd_tlfb-intensity_followup_20_NA_pfi_ao_text_ao"
"146";"McAfee, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"text";"ao";-0,037455940934931;0,151220766208692;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";32,29;43,52;82;34,42;66,13;92;45,38;60,21;86;34,83;36,44;96;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"22.2";38;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"McAfee, N. W., Martens, M. P., Herring, T. E., Takamatsu, S. K., & Foss, J. M. (2020). The efficacy of personalized feedback interventions delivered via smartphone among at-risk college student gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 45.";"10.4309/jgi.2020.45.3";"At-risk gambling is a public health problem that college students engage in at a disproportionate level compared to the general adult population. Brief interventions that incorporate personalized feedback have been efficacious at reducing gambling and related problems. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of personalized feedback-based interventions delivered via smartphone and text message. Participants were 255 students who met our screening criteria for ‘‘problem’’ or ‘‘pathological’’ gambling, and were randomized to one of three conditions: personalized feedback and follow-up targeted text messages (PFB-TXT); personalized feedback and follow-up educational information about gambling (PFB-EDU); and a control condition that received no personalized feedback or follow-up text messages. Dependent variables included percent days abstinent (PDA) from gambling, average amount wagered on a gambling day, and gambling-related problems. Results indicated that the PFB conditions did not have a direct effect relative to the control condition on the dependent variables at the six-month follow-up, but a statistically significant mediated effect on gambling-related problems via gambling norms did emerge at one-month. No differences between the two PFB conditions in terms of direct or indirect effects on the six-month outcome variables were determined. Findings from this study suggest that the personalized text condition did not provide greater efficacy in changing gambling-related outcomes over general educational messages with personalized feedback. To help explain the lack of direct intervention effects, we explored two hypotheses related to our study design and sample of gamblers.";"The Efficacy of Personalized Feedback Interventions Delivered via Smartphone among At-Risk College Student Gamblers";"https://cdspress.ca/?p=8732";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"McAfee, 2020";"McAfee_2020_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_4_NA_pfi_ao_text_ao"
"147";"McAfee, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"edu";"ao";-0,0779829687006014;0,158863058949466;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";26,63;40,96;68;29,93;42,94;93;44,38;67,5;73;34,83;36,44;96;2020;"20";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"22.2";38;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"McAfee, N. W., Martens, M. P., Herring, T. E., Takamatsu, S. K., & Foss, J. M. (2020). The efficacy of personalized feedback interventions delivered via smartphone among at-risk college student gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 45.";"10.4309/jgi.2020.45.3";"At-risk gambling is a public health problem that college students engage in at a disproportionate level compared to the general adult population. Brief interventions that incorporate personalized feedback have been efficacious at reducing gambling and related problems. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of personalized feedback-based interventions delivered via smartphone and text message. Participants were 255 students who met our screening criteria for ‘‘problem’’ or ‘‘pathological’’ gambling, and were randomized to one of three conditions: personalized feedback and follow-up targeted text messages (PFB-TXT); personalized feedback and follow-up educational information about gambling (PFB-EDU); and a control condition that received no personalized feedback or follow-up text messages. Dependent variables included percent days abstinent (PDA) from gambling, average amount wagered on a gambling day, and gambling-related problems. Results indicated that the PFB conditions did not have a direct effect relative to the control condition on the dependent variables at the six-month follow-up, but a statistically significant mediated effect on gambling-related problems via gambling norms did emerge at one-month. No differences between the two PFB conditions in terms of direct or indirect effects on the six-month outcome variables were determined. Findings from this study suggest that the personalized text condition did not provide greater efficacy in changing gambling-related outcomes over general educational messages with personalized feedback. To help explain the lack of direct intervention effects, we explored two hypotheses related to our study design and sample of gamblers.";"The Efficacy of Personalized Feedback Interventions Delivered via Smartphone among At-Risk College Student Gamblers";"https://cdspress.ca/?p=8732";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"McAfee, 2020";"McAfee_2020_msd_tlfb-intensity_followup_20_NA_pfi_ao_edu_ao"
"148";"McAfee, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"edu";"ao";0,0537232236100294;0,159191253928457;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";38,56;89,06;68;34,42;66,13;92;44,38;67,5;73;34,83;36,44;96;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"22.2";38;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"McAfee, N. W., Martens, M. P., Herring, T. E., Takamatsu, S. K., & Foss, J. M. (2020). The efficacy of personalized feedback interventions delivered via smartphone among at-risk college student gamblers. Journal of Gambling Issues, 45.";"10.4309/jgi.2020.45.3";"At-risk gambling is a public health problem that college students engage in at a disproportionate level compared to the general adult population. Brief interventions that incorporate personalized feedback have been efficacious at reducing gambling and related problems. The purpose of the present study was to examine the efficacy of personalized feedback-based interventions delivered via smartphone and text message. Participants were 255 students who met our screening criteria for ‘‘problem’’ or ‘‘pathological’’ gambling, and were randomized to one of three conditions: personalized feedback and follow-up targeted text messages (PFB-TXT); personalized feedback and follow-up educational information about gambling (PFB-EDU); and a control condition that received no personalized feedback or follow-up text messages. Dependent variables included percent days abstinent (PDA) from gambling, average amount wagered on a gambling day, and gambling-related problems. Results indicated that the PFB conditions did not have a direct effect relative to the control condition on the dependent variables at the six-month follow-up, but a statistically significant mediated effect on gambling-related problems via gambling norms did emerge at one-month. No differences between the two PFB conditions in terms of direct or indirect effects on the six-month outcome variables were determined. Findings from this study suggest that the personalized text condition did not provide greater efficacy in changing gambling-related outcomes over general educational messages with personalized feedback. To help explain the lack of direct intervention effects, we explored two hypotheses related to our study design and sample of gamblers.";"The Efficacy of Personalized Feedback Interventions Delivered via Smartphone among At-Risk College Student Gamblers";"https://cdspress.ca/?p=8732";"Journal of Gambling Issues";"McAfee, 2020";"McAfee_2020_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_4_NA_pfi_ao_edu_ao"
"149";"Myrseth, 2009";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-200878096239613;501841941099803;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"dsm-iv";1,57;2,44;7;2,29;4,07;7;7,86;1,35;7;8,71;1,11;7;2009;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"eu";"37.4";21;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Myrseth, H., Litlerè, I., Støylen, I. J., & Pallesen, S. (2009). A controlled study of the effect of cognitive–behavioural group therapy for pathological gamblers. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 63(1), 22-31.";"10.1080/08039480802055139";"As the number of pathological gamblers has increased recently, the need for effective treatment has become more evident. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a short-term cognitive–behavioural group therapy programme for pathological gamblers. Fourteen subjects (three females and 11 males), who met the criteria for pathological gambling in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV, were randomly assigned to a Treatment Group (n=7) or a waiting list Control Group (n=7). An experimental design with three repeated measures was used (pre-treatment, post-treatment/post-waiting list and follow-up). The dependent variables were DSM-IV Criteria for Pathological Gambling, Money Spent on Gambling During the Last Week and Gamblers Inventory of Negative Consequences. The Treatment Group improved on the DSM-IV Criteria for Pathological Gambling, but did not show a significant improvement on Money Spent on Gambling During the Last week from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Combining both groups at 3-months follow-up, there was a significant improvement on all three variables from pre-treatment to follow-up. The results of this controlled study indicate that a short-term cognitive–behavioural group treatment for pathological gamblers had an effect.";"A controlled study of the effect of cognitive–behavioural group therapy for pathological gamblers";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08039480802055139";"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry ";"Myrseth, 2009";"Myrseth_2009_msd_dsm-iv_followup_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"150";"Myrseth, 2009";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-770185177652907;521142376557717;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"dsm-iv";1,57;2,64;7;4,57;4,43;7;7,86;1,35;7;8,71;1,11;7;2009;"7";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"37.4";21;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Myrseth, H., Litlerè, I., Støylen, I. J., & Pallesen, S. (2009). A controlled study of the effect of cognitive–behavioural group therapy for pathological gamblers. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 63(1), 22-31.";"10.1080/08039480802055139";"As the number of pathological gamblers has increased recently, the need for effective treatment has become more evident. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a short-term cognitive–behavioural group therapy programme for pathological gamblers. Fourteen subjects (three females and 11 males), who met the criteria for pathological gambling in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV, were randomly assigned to a Treatment Group (n=7) or a waiting list Control Group (n=7). An experimental design with three repeated measures was used (pre-treatment, post-treatment/post-waiting list and follow-up). The dependent variables were DSM-IV Criteria for Pathological Gambling, Money Spent on Gambling During the Last Week and Gamblers Inventory of Negative Consequences. The Treatment Group improved on the DSM-IV Criteria for Pathological Gambling, but did not show a significant improvement on Money Spent on Gambling During the Last week from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Combining both groups at 3-months follow-up, there was a significant improvement on all three variables from pre-treatment to follow-up. The results of this controlled study indicate that a short-term cognitive–behavioural group treatment for pathological gamblers had an effect.";"A controlled study of the effect of cognitive–behavioural group therapy for pathological gamblers";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08039480802055139";"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry ";"Myrseth, 2009";"Myrseth_2009_msd_dsm-iv_post_7_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"151";"Myrseth, 2009";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-468833929189703;508187345632969;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";737,14;1227,6;7;2422,86;4599,31;7;2519,71;3144,08;7;5210;3904,68;7;2009;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"eu";"37.4";21;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Myrseth, H., Litlerè, I., Støylen, I. J., & Pallesen, S. (2009). A controlled study of the effect of cognitive–behavioural group therapy for pathological gamblers. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 63(1), 22-31.";"10.1080/08039480802055139";"As the number of pathological gamblers has increased recently, the need for effective treatment has become more evident. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a short-term cognitive–behavioural group therapy programme for pathological gamblers. Fourteen subjects (three females and 11 males), who met the criteria for pathological gambling in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV, were randomly assigned to a Treatment Group (n=7) or a waiting list Control Group (n=7). An experimental design with three repeated measures was used (pre-treatment, post-treatment/post-waiting list and follow-up). The dependent variables were DSM-IV Criteria for Pathological Gambling, Money Spent on Gambling During the Last Week and Gamblers Inventory of Negative Consequences. The Treatment Group improved on the DSM-IV Criteria for Pathological Gambling, but did not show a significant improvement on Money Spent on Gambling During the Last week from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Combining both groups at 3-months follow-up, there was a significant improvement on all three variables from pre-treatment to follow-up. The results of this controlled study indicate that a short-term cognitive–behavioural group treatment for pathological gamblers had an effect.";"A controlled study of the effect of cognitive–behavioural group therapy for pathological gamblers";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08039480802055139";"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry ";"Myrseth, 2009";"Myrseth_2009_msd_global-intensity_followup_12_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"152";"Myrseth, 2009";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-549581427464752;511068805948316;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";2968,57;6668,45;7;7800;9539,22;7;2519,71;3144,08;7;5210;3904,68;7;2009;"7";"post";"ind";"ind";"eu";"37.4";21;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Myrseth, H., Litlerè, I., Støylen, I. J., & Pallesen, S. (2009). A controlled study of the effect of cognitive–behavioural group therapy for pathological gamblers. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 63(1), 22-31.";"10.1080/08039480802055139";"As the number of pathological gamblers has increased recently, the need for effective treatment has become more evident. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a short-term cognitive–behavioural group therapy programme for pathological gamblers. Fourteen subjects (three females and 11 males), who met the criteria for pathological gambling in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV, were randomly assigned to a Treatment Group (n=7) or a waiting list Control Group (n=7). An experimental design with three repeated measures was used (pre-treatment, post-treatment/post-waiting list and follow-up). The dependent variables were DSM-IV Criteria for Pathological Gambling, Money Spent on Gambling During the Last Week and Gamblers Inventory of Negative Consequences. The Treatment Group improved on the DSM-IV Criteria for Pathological Gambling, but did not show a significant improvement on Money Spent on Gambling During the Last week from pre-treatment to post-treatment. Combining both groups at 3-months follow-up, there was a significant improvement on all three variables from pre-treatment to follow-up. The results of this controlled study indicate that a short-term cognitive–behavioural group treatment for pathological gamblers had an effect.";"A controlled study of the effect of cognitive–behavioural group therapy for pathological gamblers";"https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08039480802055139";"Nordic Journal of Psychiatry ";"Myrseth, 2009";"Myrseth_2009_msd_global-intensity_post_7_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"153";"Neighbors, 2015";"pfi";"ac";"NA";"NA";0,0996885285084099;0,132385670497483;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";15,33;42,27;113;11,92;23,31;114;24,07;44,75;124;19,95;39,33;128;2015;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"23.1";40;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Neighbors, C., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., Gonzales, R. G., Agana, M., Tackett, J. L., & Foster, D. W. (2015). Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 500-511.";"10.1037/a0039125";"Objective: Social influences on gambling among adolescents and adults have been well documented and may be particularly evident among college students, who have higher rates of problem and pathological gambling relative to the general population. Personalized normative feedback (PNF) is a brief intervention designed to correct misperceptions regarding the prevalence of problematic behavior by showing individuals engaging in such behaviors that their own behavior is atypical with respect to actual norms. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated a computer-delivered PNF intervention for problem gambling college students. Method: Following a baseline assessment, 252 college student gamblers scoring 2+ on the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) were randomly assigned to receive PNF or attention-control feedback. Follow-up assessments were completed 3 and 6 months postintervention. Results: Results indicated significant intervention effects in reducing perceived norms for quantities lost and won, and in reducing actual quantity lost and gambling problems at the 3-month follow-up. All intervention effects except reduced gambling problems remained at the 6-month follow-up. Mediation results indicated that changes in perceived norms at 3 months mediated the intervention effects. Further, the intervention effects were moderated by self-identification with other student gamblers, suggesting that PNF worked better at reducing gambling for those who more strongly identified with other student gamblers. Conclusions: Results support the use of PNF as a stand-alone brief intervention for at-risk gambling students. Extending this approach more broadly may provide an accessible, empirically supported gambling prevention option for universities and related institutions. ";"Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: A randomized controlled trial";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-23039-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Neighbors, 2015";"Neighbors_2015_msd_global-freq_followup_12_NA_pfi_ac_NA_NA"
"154";"Neighbors, 2015";"pfi";"ac";"NA";"NA";0,13872645933371;0,132463075061834;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";20,42;51,72;113;14,77;25,09;114;24,07;44,75;124;19,95;39,33;128;2015;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"23.1";40;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Neighbors, C., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., Gonzales, R. G., Agana, M., Tackett, J. L., & Foster, D. W. (2015). Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 500-511.";"10.1037/a0039125";"Objective: Social influences on gambling among adolescents and adults have been well documented and may be particularly evident among college students, who have higher rates of problem and pathological gambling relative to the general population. Personalized normative feedback (PNF) is a brief intervention designed to correct misperceptions regarding the prevalence of problematic behavior by showing individuals engaging in such behaviors that their own behavior is atypical with respect to actual norms. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated a computer-delivered PNF intervention for problem gambling college students. Method: Following a baseline assessment, 252 college student gamblers scoring 2+ on the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) were randomly assigned to receive PNF or attention-control feedback. Follow-up assessments were completed 3 and 6 months postintervention. Results: Results indicated significant intervention effects in reducing perceived norms for quantities lost and won, and in reducing actual quantity lost and gambling problems at the 3-month follow-up. All intervention effects except reduced gambling problems remained at the 6-month follow-up. Mediation results indicated that changes in perceived norms at 3 months mediated the intervention effects. Further, the intervention effects were moderated by self-identification with other student gamblers, suggesting that PNF worked better at reducing gambling for those who more strongly identified with other student gamblers. Conclusions: Results support the use of PNF as a stand-alone brief intervention for at-risk gambling students. Extending this approach more broadly may provide an accessible, empirically supported gambling prevention option for universities and related institutions. ";"Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: A randomized controlled trial";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-23039-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Neighbors, 2015";"Neighbors_2015_msd_global-freq_post_12_NA_pfi_ac_NA_NA"
"155";"Neighbors, 2015";"pfi";"ac";"NA";"NA";-0,164663669570825;0,132528483957334;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";22,58;54,79;113;33;70,32;114;36,69;85,37;124;22,41;46,93;128;2015;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"23.1";40;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Neighbors, C., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., Gonzales, R. G., Agana, M., Tackett, J. L., & Foster, D. W. (2015). Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 500-511.";"10.1037/a0039125";"Objective: Social influences on gambling among adolescents and adults have been well documented and may be particularly evident among college students, who have higher rates of problem and pathological gambling relative to the general population. Personalized normative feedback (PNF) is a brief intervention designed to correct misperceptions regarding the prevalence of problematic behavior by showing individuals engaging in such behaviors that their own behavior is atypical with respect to actual norms. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated a computer-delivered PNF intervention for problem gambling college students. Method: Following a baseline assessment, 252 college student gamblers scoring 2+ on the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) were randomly assigned to receive PNF or attention-control feedback. Follow-up assessments were completed 3 and 6 months postintervention. Results: Results indicated significant intervention effects in reducing perceived norms for quantities lost and won, and in reducing actual quantity lost and gambling problems at the 3-month follow-up. All intervention effects except reduced gambling problems remained at the 6-month follow-up. Mediation results indicated that changes in perceived norms at 3 months mediated the intervention effects. Further, the intervention effects were moderated by self-identification with other student gamblers, suggesting that PNF worked better at reducing gambling for those who more strongly identified with other student gamblers. Conclusions: Results support the use of PNF as a stand-alone brief intervention for at-risk gambling students. Extending this approach more broadly may provide an accessible, empirically supported gambling prevention option for universities and related institutions. ";"Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: A randomized controlled trial";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-23039-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Neighbors, 2015";"Neighbors_2015_msd_global-intensity_post_12_NA_pfi_ac_NA_NA"
"156";"Neighbors, 2015";"pfi";"ac";"NA";"NA";-0,241144263434817;0,132786148541234;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";16,57;40,58;113;34,82;98,47;114;36,69;85,37;124;22,41;46,93;128;2015;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"23.1";40;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Neighbors, C., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., Gonzales, R. G., Agana, M., Tackett, J. L., & Foster, D. W. (2015). Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 500-511.";"10.1037/a0039125";"Objective: Social influences on gambling among adolescents and adults have been well documented and may be particularly evident among college students, who have higher rates of problem and pathological gambling relative to the general population. Personalized normative feedback (PNF) is a brief intervention designed to correct misperceptions regarding the prevalence of problematic behavior by showing individuals engaging in such behaviors that their own behavior is atypical with respect to actual norms. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated a computer-delivered PNF intervention for problem gambling college students. Method: Following a baseline assessment, 252 college student gamblers scoring 2+ on the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) were randomly assigned to receive PNF or attention-control feedback. Follow-up assessments were completed 3 and 6 months postintervention. Results: Results indicated significant intervention effects in reducing perceived norms for quantities lost and won, and in reducing actual quantity lost and gambling problems at the 3-month follow-up. All intervention effects except reduced gambling problems remained at the 6-month follow-up. Mediation results indicated that changes in perceived norms at 3 months mediated the intervention effects. Further, the intervention effects were moderated by self-identification with other student gamblers, suggesting that PNF worked better at reducing gambling for those who more strongly identified with other student gamblers. Conclusions: Results support the use of PNF as a stand-alone brief intervention for at-risk gambling students. Extending this approach more broadly may provide an accessible, empirically supported gambling prevention option for universities and related institutions. ";"Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: A randomized controlled trial";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-23039-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Neighbors, 2015";"Neighbors_2015_msd_global-intensity_followup_12_NA_pfi_ac_NA_NA"
"157";"Neighbors, 2015";"pfi";"ac";"NA";"NA";-0,101115953098079;0,132388054989298;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gpi";3,56;7,93;113;4,48;10,07;114;4,51;8,04;124;2,87;4,35;128;2015;"12";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"23.1";40;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Neighbors, C., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., Gonzales, R. G., Agana, M., Tackett, J. L., & Foster, D. W. (2015). Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 500-511.";"10.1037/a0039125";"Objective: Social influences on gambling among adolescents and adults have been well documented and may be particularly evident among college students, who have higher rates of problem and pathological gambling relative to the general population. Personalized normative feedback (PNF) is a brief intervention designed to correct misperceptions regarding the prevalence of problematic behavior by showing individuals engaging in such behaviors that their own behavior is atypical with respect to actual norms. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated a computer-delivered PNF intervention for problem gambling college students. Method: Following a baseline assessment, 252 college student gamblers scoring 2+ on the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) were randomly assigned to receive PNF or attention-control feedback. Follow-up assessments were completed 3 and 6 months postintervention. Results: Results indicated significant intervention effects in reducing perceived norms for quantities lost and won, and in reducing actual quantity lost and gambling problems at the 3-month follow-up. All intervention effects except reduced gambling problems remained at the 6-month follow-up. Mediation results indicated that changes in perceived norms at 3 months mediated the intervention effects. Further, the intervention effects were moderated by self-identification with other student gamblers, suggesting that PNF worked better at reducing gambling for those who more strongly identified with other student gamblers. Conclusions: Results support the use of PNF as a stand-alone brief intervention for at-risk gambling students. Extending this approach more broadly may provide an accessible, empirically supported gambling prevention option for universities and related institutions. ";"Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: A randomized controlled trial";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-23039-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Neighbors, 2015";"Neighbors_2015_msd_gpi_post_12_NA_pfi_ac_NA_NA"
"158";"Neighbors, 2015";"pfi";"ac";"NA";"NA";-0,0606049033841223;0,132333542715039;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gpi";3,61;9,17;113;4,23;11,12;114;4,51;8,04;124;2,87;4,35;128;2015;"12";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"23.1";40;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Neighbors, C., Rodriguez, L. M., Rinker, D. V., Gonzales, R. G., Agana, M., Tackett, J. L., & Foster, D. W. (2015). Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 83(3), 500-511.";"10.1037/a0039125";"Objective: Social influences on gambling among adolescents and adults have been well documented and may be particularly evident among college students, who have higher rates of problem and pathological gambling relative to the general population. Personalized normative feedback (PNF) is a brief intervention designed to correct misperceptions regarding the prevalence of problematic behavior by showing individuals engaging in such behaviors that their own behavior is atypical with respect to actual norms. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated a computer-delivered PNF intervention for problem gambling college students. Method: Following a baseline assessment, 252 college student gamblers scoring 2+ on the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) were randomly assigned to receive PNF or attention-control feedback. Follow-up assessments were completed 3 and 6 months postintervention. Results: Results indicated significant intervention effects in reducing perceived norms for quantities lost and won, and in reducing actual quantity lost and gambling problems at the 3-month follow-up. All intervention effects except reduced gambling problems remained at the 6-month follow-up. Mediation results indicated that changes in perceived norms at 3 months mediated the intervention effects. Further, the intervention effects were moderated by self-identification with other student gamblers, suggesting that PNF worked better at reducing gambling for those who more strongly identified with other student gamblers. Conclusions: Results support the use of PNF as a stand-alone brief intervention for at-risk gambling students. Extending this approach more broadly may provide an accessible, empirically supported gambling prevention option for universities and related institutions. ";"Efficacy of personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for college student gambling: A randomized controlled trial";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-23039-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Neighbors, 2015";"Neighbors_2015_msd_gpi_followup_12_NA_pfi_ac_NA_NA"
"159";"Oei, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"grp";"wl";-159617509574113;284339149692352;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";2,24;2,88;37;6,64;2,5;28;5,59;2,18;37;NA;NA;NA;2010;"6";"post";"grp";"grp";"au";"46.4";41;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., & Casey, L. M. (2010). Effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment program for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38(2), 233-238.";"10.1017/S1352465809990701";"Background: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) program for problem gamblers (PGs) using a randomized controlled design. Method: One hundred and two PGs were randomly assigned to individual or group CBT conditions. Twenty-eight of these participants were randomly allocated to a 6-week waitlist control condition prior to receiving the designated treatment. Results: At post-treatment, there were significant improvements in all dependent variables (frequency and amount gambled, gambling urges, gambling cognitions, negative psychological states, and life satisfaction) for both the treatment conditions but not for the waitlist condition. Individuals that completed the individual (compared to group) treatment condition generally had higher effect sizes for gambling correlates. Therapeutic gains for gambling correlates were generally maintained at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: A combined motivational interviewing and CBT program applied in group or individual format can improve PG behaviors, as well as gambling correlates.";"Effectiveness of Group and Individual Formats of a Combined Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Program for Problem Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-and-cognitive-psychotherapy/article/abs/effectiveness-of-group-and-individual-formats-of-a-combined-motivational-interviewing-and-cognitive-behavioral-treatment-program-for-problem-gambling-a-randomized-controlled-trial/2385704CA941CA8A83223DCE2EE66B40";"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy";"Oei, 2010";"Oei_2010_msd_global-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_grp_wl"
"160";"Oei, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"ind";"wl";-178947822863663;293058082464504;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";2,75;1,84;37;6,64;2,5;28;5,66;2,29;37;NA;NA;NA;2010;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"43.4";41;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., & Casey, L. M. (2010). Effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment program for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38(2), 233-238.";"10.1017/S1352465809990701";"Background: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) program for problem gamblers (PGs) using a randomized controlled design. Method: One hundred and two PGs were randomly assigned to individual or group CBT conditions. Twenty-eight of these participants were randomly allocated to a 6-week waitlist control condition prior to receiving the designated treatment. Results: At post-treatment, there were significant improvements in all dependent variables (frequency and amount gambled, gambling urges, gambling cognitions, negative psychological states, and life satisfaction) for both the treatment conditions but not for the waitlist condition. Individuals that completed the individual (compared to group) treatment condition generally had higher effect sizes for gambling correlates. Therapeutic gains for gambling correlates were generally maintained at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: A combined motivational interviewing and CBT program applied in group or individual format can improve PG behaviors, as well as gambling correlates.";"Effectiveness of Group and Individual Formats of a Combined Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Program for Problem Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-and-cognitive-psychotherapy/article/abs/effectiveness-of-group-and-individual-formats-of-a-combined-motivational-interviewing-and-cognitive-behavioral-treatment-program-for-problem-gambling-a-randomized-controlled-trial/2385704CA941CA8A83223DCE2EE66B40";"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy";"Oei, 2010";"Oei_2010_msd_global-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_ind_wl"
"161";"Oei, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"grp";"wl";-419504273878571;250208323444966;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";79;127;37;1191;3998;28;246;244;37;NA;NA;NA;2010;"6";"post";"grp";"grp";"au";"46.4";41;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., & Casey, L. M. (2010). Effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment program for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38(2), 233-238.";"10.1017/S1352465809990701";"Background: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) program for problem gamblers (PGs) using a randomized controlled design. Method: One hundred and two PGs were randomly assigned to individual or group CBT conditions. Twenty-eight of these participants were randomly allocated to a 6-week waitlist control condition prior to receiving the designated treatment. Results: At post-treatment, there were significant improvements in all dependent variables (frequency and amount gambled, gambling urges, gambling cognitions, negative psychological states, and life satisfaction) for both the treatment conditions but not for the waitlist condition. Individuals that completed the individual (compared to group) treatment condition generally had higher effect sizes for gambling correlates. Therapeutic gains for gambling correlates were generally maintained at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: A combined motivational interviewing and CBT program applied in group or individual format can improve PG behaviors, as well as gambling correlates.";"Effectiveness of Group and Individual Formats of a Combined Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Program for Problem Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-and-cognitive-psychotherapy/article/abs/effectiveness-of-group-and-individual-formats-of-a-combined-motivational-interviewing-and-cognitive-behavioral-treatment-program-for-problem-gambling-a-randomized-controlled-trial/2385704CA941CA8A83223DCE2EE66B40";"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy";"Oei, 2010";"Oei_2010_msd_global-intensity_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_grp_wl"
"162";"Oei, 2010";"cbt";"wl";"ind";"wl";-395228054558313;249904105378533;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";142;217;37;1191;3998;28;438;775;37;NA;NA;NA;2010;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"au";"43.4";41;1;0;0;0;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P., Raylu, N., & Casey, L. M. (2010). Effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment program for problem gambling: A randomized controlled trial. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 38(2), 233-238.";"10.1017/S1352465809990701";"Background: The study aimed to assess the effectiveness of group and individual formats of a combined motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) program for problem gamblers (PGs) using a randomized controlled design. Method: One hundred and two PGs were randomly assigned to individual or group CBT conditions. Twenty-eight of these participants were randomly allocated to a 6-week waitlist control condition prior to receiving the designated treatment. Results: At post-treatment, there were significant improvements in all dependent variables (frequency and amount gambled, gambling urges, gambling cognitions, negative psychological states, and life satisfaction) for both the treatment conditions but not for the waitlist condition. Individuals that completed the individual (compared to group) treatment condition generally had higher effect sizes for gambling correlates. Therapeutic gains for gambling correlates were generally maintained at 6-month follow-up. Conclusions: A combined motivational interviewing and CBT program applied in group or individual format can improve PG behaviors, as well as gambling correlates.";"Effectiveness of Group and Individual Formats of a Combined Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Behavioral Treatment Program for Problem Gambling: A Randomized Controlled Trial";"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-and-cognitive-psychotherapy/article/abs/effectiveness-of-group-and-individual-formats-of-a-combined-motivational-interviewing-and-cognitive-behavioral-treatment-program-for-problem-gambling-a-randomized-controlled-trial/2385704CA941CA8A83223DCE2EE66B40";"Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy";"Oei, 2010";"Oei_2010_msd_global-intensity_post_6_NA_cbt_wl_ind_wl"
"163";"Oei, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-112134348429325;289912752525087;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"cpgi";11,09;8,41;23;18,53;4,79;32;16,04;6,95;32;NA;NA;NA;2018;"7";"post";"ind";"ush";"au";"49.4";51;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P. S., Raylu, N., & Lai, W. W. (2018). Effectiveness of a self help cognitive behavioural treatment program for problem gamblers: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 581-595.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"The study aimed to strengthen the scarce literature on self-help treatments for Problem Gambling (PG) by comparing the effectiveness of a Self-Help Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (SHCBT) program (n = 23) with a 6-week Waitlist condition (n = 32) in problem gamblers. Participants were community volunteers with gambling problems and were randomly allocated to the Waitlist and treatment conditions. Results showed significant improvements at post-treatment in gambling behaviors including frequency of gambling, average amount gambled per day and PG symptoms as well as a number of gambling correlates including psychological states (e.g., depression, anxiety and stress), gambling cognitions, gambling urges, gambling related self-efficacy, satisfaction with life, and quality of life among those who completed the SHCBT program, when compared with the waitlist condition. The effect size (partial η 2) ranged from .25 to .57 for all assessed outcomes that showed significant improvement from pre- to post-treatment. It was concluded that a self-help CBT program can be beneficial for treating community problem gamblers.";"Effectiveness of a Self Help Cognitive Behavioural Treatment Program for Problem Gamblers: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Oei, 2018";"Oei_2018_msd_cpgi_post_7_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"164";"Oei, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-640461824885086;276310342447865;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"dass-a";5,52;9,51;23;12,71;12,05;32;12,86;10,29;32;NA;NA;NA;2018;"7";"post";"ind";"ush";"au";"49.4";51;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P. S., Raylu, N., & Lai, W. W. (2018). Effectiveness of a self help cognitive behavioural treatment program for problem gamblers: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 581-595.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"The study aimed to strengthen the scarce literature on self-help treatments for Problem Gambling (PG) by comparing the effectiveness of a Self-Help Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (SHCBT) program (n = 23) with a 6-week Waitlist condition (n = 32) in problem gamblers. Participants were community volunteers with gambling problems and were randomly allocated to the Waitlist and treatment conditions. Results showed significant improvements at post-treatment in gambling behaviors including frequency of gambling, average amount gambled per day and PG symptoms as well as a number of gambling correlates including psychological states (e.g., depression, anxiety and stress), gambling cognitions, gambling urges, gambling related self-efficacy, satisfaction with life, and quality of life among those who completed the SHCBT program, when compared with the waitlist condition. The effect size (partial η 2) ranged from .25 to .57 for all assessed outcomes that showed significant improvement from pre- to post-treatment. It was concluded that a self-help CBT program can be beneficial for treating community problem gamblers.";"Effectiveness of a Self Help Cognitive Behavioural Treatment Program for Problem Gamblers: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Oei, 2018";"Oei_2018_msd_dass-a_post_7_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"165";"Oei, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-72818307920906;278278373306519;"msd";"depression";"NA";"dass-d";12,64;14,82;23;22,26;11,58;32;23,82;12,72;32;NA;NA;NA;2018;"7";"post";"ind";"ush";"au";"49.4";51;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P. S., Raylu, N., & Lai, W. W. (2018). Effectiveness of a self help cognitive behavioural treatment program for problem gamblers: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 581-595.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"The study aimed to strengthen the scarce literature on self-help treatments for Problem Gambling (PG) by comparing the effectiveness of a Self-Help Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (SHCBT) program (n = 23) with a 6-week Waitlist condition (n = 32) in problem gamblers. Participants were community volunteers with gambling problems and were randomly allocated to the Waitlist and treatment conditions. Results showed significant improvements at post-treatment in gambling behaviors including frequency of gambling, average amount gambled per day and PG symptoms as well as a number of gambling correlates including psychological states (e.g., depression, anxiety and stress), gambling cognitions, gambling urges, gambling related self-efficacy, satisfaction with life, and quality of life among those who completed the SHCBT program, when compared with the waitlist condition. The effect size (partial η 2) ranged from .25 to .57 for all assessed outcomes that showed significant improvement from pre- to post-treatment. It was concluded that a self-help CBT program can be beneficial for treating community problem gamblers.";"Effectiveness of a Self Help Cognitive Behavioural Treatment Program for Problem Gamblers: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Oei, 2018";"Oei_2018_msd_dass-d_post_7_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"166";"Oei, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-123576704526377;29411104008253;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";2,61;2,04;23;5,16;2,03;32;6,87;3,02;32;NA;NA;NA;2018;"7";"post";"ind";"ush";"au";"49.4";51;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P. S., Raylu, N., & Lai, W. W. (2018). Effectiveness of a self help cognitive behavioural treatment program for problem gamblers: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 581-595.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"The study aimed to strengthen the scarce literature on self-help treatments for Problem Gambling (PG) by comparing the effectiveness of a Self-Help Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (SHCBT) program (n = 23) with a 6-week Waitlist condition (n = 32) in problem gamblers. Participants were community volunteers with gambling problems and were randomly allocated to the Waitlist and treatment conditions. Results showed significant improvements at post-treatment in gambling behaviors including frequency of gambling, average amount gambled per day and PG symptoms as well as a number of gambling correlates including psychological states (e.g., depression, anxiety and stress), gambling cognitions, gambling urges, gambling related self-efficacy, satisfaction with life, and quality of life among those who completed the SHCBT program, when compared with the waitlist condition. The effect size (partial η 2) ranged from .25 to .57 for all assessed outcomes that showed significant improvement from pre- to post-treatment. It was concluded that a self-help CBT program can be beneficial for treating community problem gamblers.";"Effectiveness of a Self Help Cognitive Behavioural Treatment Program for Problem Gamblers: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Oei, 2018";"Oei_2018_msd_global-freq_post_7_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"167";"Oei, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";643852365067163;269547916086902;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";364,96;1133,1;23;313,24;401,12;32;753,22;1159,79;32;NA;NA;NA;2018;"7";"post";"ind";"ush";"au";"49.4";51;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P. S., Raylu, N., & Lai, W. W. (2018). Effectiveness of a self help cognitive behavioural treatment program for problem gamblers: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 581-595.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"The study aimed to strengthen the scarce literature on self-help treatments for Problem Gambling (PG) by comparing the effectiveness of a Self-Help Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (SHCBT) program (n = 23) with a 6-week Waitlist condition (n = 32) in problem gamblers. Participants were community volunteers with gambling problems and were randomly allocated to the Waitlist and treatment conditions. Results showed significant improvements at post-treatment in gambling behaviors including frequency of gambling, average amount gambled per day and PG symptoms as well as a number of gambling correlates including psychological states (e.g., depression, anxiety and stress), gambling cognitions, gambling urges, gambling related self-efficacy, satisfaction with life, and quality of life among those who completed the SHCBT program, when compared with the waitlist condition. The effect size (partial η 2) ranged from .25 to .57 for all assessed outcomes that showed significant improvement from pre- to post-treatment. It was concluded that a self-help CBT program can be beneficial for treating community problem gamblers.";"Effectiveness of a Self Help Cognitive Behavioural Treatment Program for Problem Gamblers: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Oei, 2018";"Oei_2018_msd_global-intensity_post_7_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"168";"Oei, 2018";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";214350078253041;270251889148458;"msd";"qol";"NA";"whoqol";80,29;21,47;23;76,63;12,54;32;71,59;17,18;32;NA;NA;NA;2018;"7";"post";"ind";"ush";"au";"49.4";51;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Oei, T. P. S., Raylu, N., & Lai, W. W. (2018). Effectiveness of a self help cognitive behavioural treatment program for problem gamblers: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 34(2), 581-595.";"10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"The study aimed to strengthen the scarce literature on self-help treatments for Problem Gambling (PG) by comparing the effectiveness of a Self-Help Cognitive Behavioral Treatment (SHCBT) program (n = 23) with a 6-week Waitlist condition (n = 32) in problem gamblers. Participants were community volunteers with gambling problems and were randomly allocated to the Waitlist and treatment conditions. Results showed significant improvements at post-treatment in gambling behaviors including frequency of gambling, average amount gambled per day and PG symptoms as well as a number of gambling correlates including psychological states (e.g., depression, anxiety and stress), gambling cognitions, gambling urges, gambling related self-efficacy, satisfaction with life, and quality of life among those who completed the SHCBT program, when compared with the waitlist condition. The effect size (partial η 2) ranged from .25 to .57 for all assessed outcomes that showed significant improvement from pre- to post-treatment. It was concluded that a self-help CBT program can be beneficial for treating community problem gamblers.";"Effectiveness of a Self Help Cognitive Behavioural Treatment Program for Problem Gamblers: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-017-9723-1";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Oei, 2018";"Oei_2018_msd_whoqol_post_7_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"169";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"f2f";"cau";-386020561574708;182616567486037;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,36;0,22;70;0,46;0,3;53;0,72;0,19;84;0,65;0,23;63;2006;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_asi_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_f2f_cau"
"170";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"f2f";"cau";-234740483337905;190429612714545;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,32;0,28;70;0,39;0,32;45;0,72;0,19;84;0,65;0,23;63;2006;"40";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_asi_followup_40_NA_cbt_cau_f2f_cau"
"171";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";-730101087397501;179941855241956;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,44;0,25;72;0,46;0,3;53;0,74;0,19;84;0,65;0,23;63;2006;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_asi_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"172";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";-334607702607027;192002756441166;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,38;0,28;66;0,39;0,32;45;0,74;0,19;84;0,65;0,23;63;2006;"40";"follow up";"ind";"ush";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_asi_followup_40_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"173";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";-21628587394777;179887799884191;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";4,6;4,8;72;4,5;4,3;53;9;3,7;84;7,9;3,8;63;2006;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_sogs_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"174";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";127273026532626;192179554074158;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";6;4,6;66;5,4;4,8;45;9;3,7;84;7,9;3,8;63;2006;"40";"follow up";"ind";"ush";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_sogs_followup_40_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"175";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"f2f";"cau";-406022920047565;182792811929039;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";2,9;3,6;70;4,5;4,3;53;8,7;3,9;84;7,9;3,8;63;2006;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_sogs_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_f2f_cau"
"176";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"f2f";"cau";-107525431080019;189931901131316;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";4,9;4,5;70;5,4;4,8;45;8,7;3,9;84;7,9;3,8;63;2006;"40";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_sogs_followup_40_NA_cbt_cau_f2f_cau"
"177";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";-139933984684308;192219198257764;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";5,9;7,3;66;7;8,5;45;14,7;10,3;84;14,2;10,2;63;2006;"40";"follow up";"ind";"ush";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_tlfb-freq_followup_40_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"178";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"wb";"cau";-218071172428867;18041055819708;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";6,1;7,9;72;8;9,6;53;14,7;10,3;84;14,2;10,2;63;2006;"8";"post";"ind";"ush";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_tlfb-freq_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_wb_cau"
"179";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"f2f";"cau";-122942482855678;189972565081676;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";6;7,8;70;7;8,5;45;13,3;9,7;84;14,2;10,2;63;2006;"40";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_tlfb-freq_followup_40_NA_cbt_cau_f2f_cau"
"180";"Petry, 2006";"cbt";"cau";"f2f";"cau";-420713128985457;182927804633283;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";4,5;7,1;70;8;9,6;53;13,3;9,7;84;14,2;10,2;63;2006;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"44.9";45;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Ammerman, Y., Bohl, J., Doersch, A., Gay, H., Kadden, R., ... & Steinberg, K. (2006). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(3), 555-567.";"10.1037/0022-006X.74.3.555";"Few studies have evaluated efficacy of psychotherapies for pathological gambling. Pathological gamblers (N = 231) were randomly assigned to (a) referral to Gamblers Anonymous (GA), (b) GA referral plus a cognitive- behavioral (CB) workbook, or (c) GA referral plus 8 sessions of individual CB therapy. Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline, 1 month later, posttreatment, and at 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CB treatment reduced gambling relative to GA referral alone during the treatment period and resulted in clinically significant improvements, with some effects maintained throughout follow-up ( ps = .05). Individual CB therapy improved some outcomes compared with the CB workbook. Attendance at GA and number of CB therapy sessions or workbook exercises completed were associated with gambling abstinence. These data suggest the efficacy of this CB therapy approach.";"Cognitive-behavioral therapy for pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006X.74.3.555";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2006";"Petry_2006_msd_tlfb-freq_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_f2f_cau"
"181";"Petry, 2008";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-104309111146446;216327518347852;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,32;0,19;38;0,34;0,19;47;0,4;0,18;40;0,44;0,21;48;2008;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 318-328.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_asi_post_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"182";"Petry, 2008";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-374115124124962;230358696732795;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,25;0,17;34;0,33;0,24;42;0,4;0,18;40;0,44;0,21;48;2008;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 318-328.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_asi_followup_30_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"183";"Petry, 2008";"mi";"ao";"MET";"ao";0,221916884234619;0,200325986203947;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,39;0,25;52;0,34;0,19;47;0,41;0,22;55;0,44;0,21;48;2008;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 318-328.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_asi_post_6_NA_mi_ao_MET_ao"
"184";"Petry, 2008";"mi";"ao";"MET";"ao";-0,0826210826210827;0,209573176181481;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,31;0,24;48;0,33;0,24;42;0,41;0,22;55;0,44;0,21;48;2008;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 318-328.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_asi_followup_30_NA_mi_ao_MET_ao"
"185";"Petry, 2008";"mi";"ao";"advice";"ao";-0,119271604665223;0,216980213790571;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,31;0,31;37;0,34;0,19;48;0,44;0,24;37;0,44;0,34;48;2008;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 76(2), 318.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_asi_post_6_NA_mi_ao_advice_ao"
"186";"Petry, 2008";"mi";"ao";"advice";"ao";-0,0781962834404978;0,216870240182883;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,31;0,27;37;0,33;0,24;48;0,44;0,24;37;0,44;0,34;48;2008;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 76(2), 318.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_asi_followup_30_NA_mi_ao_advice_ao"
"187";"Petry, 2008";"mi";"ao";"advice";"ao";-0,666108682256312;0,222725699155342;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";1,6;1,4;37;2,4;1;48;2,5;0,5;37;2,8;0,6;48;2008;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 76(2), 318.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_global-intensity_post_6_NA_mi_ao_advice_ao"
"188";"Petry, 2008";"mi";"ao";"advice";"ao";-0,411682612430368;0,219074619274164;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";1,5;1,5;37;2,1;1,4;48;2,5;0,5;37;2,8;0,6;48;2008;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 76(2), 318.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_global-intensity_followup_30_NA_mi_ao_advice_ao"
"189";"Petry, 2008";"mi";"ao";"MET";"ao";-0,178838584911998;0,200108244497778;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";2,2;1,2;52;2,4;1;47;2,5;0,7;55;2,8;0,6;48;2008;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 318-328.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_global-intensity_post_6_NA_mi_ao_MET_ao"
"190";"Petry, 2008";"mi";"ao";"MET";"ao";-0,0735764221331926;0,209554450071566;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";2;1,3;48;2,1;1,4;42;2,5;0,7;55;2,8;0,6;48;2008;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 318-328.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_global-intensity_followup_30_NA_mi_ao_MET_ao"
"191";"Petry, 2008";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-396374622356495;21830663315691;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";2;1;38;2,4;1;47;2,6;0,8;40;2,8;0,6;48;2008;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 318-328.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_global-intensity_post_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"192";"Petry, 2008";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-205437234411611;228958482267921;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";1,8;1,5;34;2,1;1,4;42;2,6;0,8;40;2,8;0,6;48;2008;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"43.5";40;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Ledgerwood, D. M., & Morasco, B. (2008). A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(2), 318-328.";"10.1037/0022-006X.76.2.318";"Limited research exists regarding methods for reducing problem gambling. Problem gamblers (N = 180) were randomly assigned to assessment only control, 10 min of brief advice, 1 session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET), or 1 session of MET plus 3 sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy. Gambling was assessed at baseline, at 6 weeks, and at a 9-month follow-up. Relative to assessment only, brief advice was the only condition that significantly decreased gambling between baseline and Week 6, and it was associated with clinically significant reductions in gambling at Month 9. Between Week 6 and Month 9, MET plus cognitive-behavioral therapy evidenced significantly reduced gambling on 1 index compared with the control condition. These results suggest the efficacy of a very brief intervention for reduction of gambling among problem and pathological gamblers who are not actively seeking gambling treatment. ";"A randomized trial of brief interventions for problem and pathological gamblers.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-03290-013";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2008";"Petry_2008_msd_global-intensity_followup_30_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"193";"Petry, 2009";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-244924970478235;288100003103087;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,18;0,1;18;0,21;0,13;34;0,33;0,11;21;0,3;0,12;34;2009;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_asi_post_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"194";"Petry, 2009";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-390297617614841;286212595024473;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,17;0,15;19;0,24;0,19;33;0,33;0,11;21;0,3;0,12;34;2009;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_asi_followup_30_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"195";"Petry, 2009";"mi";"ao";"MET";"ao";-0,315050082043985;0,249009284073289;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,17;0,12;30;0,21;0,13;34;0,3;0,15;30;0,3;0,12;34;2009;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_asi_post_6_NA_mi_ao_MET_ao"
"196";"Petry, 2009";"mi";"ao";"advice";"ao";-0,146474313012978;0,243732150009896;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,19;0,14;32;0,21;0,13;34;0,3;0,15;32;0,3;0,12;34;2009;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index–gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions:   These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.
";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_asi_post_6_NA_mi_ao_advice_ao"
"197";"Petry, 2009";"mi";"ao";"advice";"ao";-0,494223235811594;0,24717049580656;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,16;0,12;32;0,24;0,19;34;0,3;0,15;32;0,3;0,12;34;2009;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index–gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions:   These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.
";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_asi_followup_30_NA_mi_ao_advice_ao"
"198";"Petry, 2009";"mi";"ao";"MET";"ao";-0,65932852526781;0,258215673450987;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,13;0,13;29;0,24;0,19;33;0,3;0,15;30;0,3;0,12;34;2009;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_asi_followup_30_NA_mi_ao_MET_ao"
"199";"Petry, 2009";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-446323379194351;286998858912341;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";6,1;7,8;19;10,3;10;33;15,7;8,7;21;14,2;8,2;34;2009;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_tlfb-freq_followup_30_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"200";"Petry, 2009";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-116723122922506;287325259141114;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";8,9;8,7;18;9,9;8,3;34;15,7;8,7;21;14,2;8,2;34;2009;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_tlfb-freq_post_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"201";"Petry, 2009";"mi";"ao";"MET";"ao";-0,531305457109583;0,255824297101943;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";5,5;7,5;29;10,3;10;33;14,1;8,9;30;14,2;8,2;34;2009;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_tlfb-freq_followup_30_NA_mi_ao_MET_ao"
"202";"Petry, 2009";"mi";"ao";"MET";"ao";-0,318176652192776;0,249040340024294;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";7,4;7,1;30;9,9;8,3;34;14,1;8,9;30;14,2;8,2;34;2009;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index-gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_tlfb-freq_post_6_NA_mi_ao_MET_ao"
"203";"Petry, 2009";"mi";"ao";"advice";"ao";-0,507858818366511;0,247379807059958;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";5,9;6,7;32;10,3;10;34;13,3;7,7;32;14,2;8,2;34;2009;"30";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index–gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions:   These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.
";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_tlfb-intensity_followup_30_NA_mi_ao_advice_ao"
"204";"Petry, 2009";"mi";"ao";"advice";"ao";-0,239753083815225;0,24429140668257;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";8;7,3;32;9,9;8,3;34;13,3;7,7;32;14,2;8,2;34;2009;"6";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"20.3";15;1;1;1;1;4;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Weinstock, J., Morasco, B. J., & Ledgerwood, D. M. (2009). Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers. Addiction, 104(9), 1569-1578.";"10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Aims: College students experience high rates of problem and pathological gambling, yet little research has investigated methods for reducing gambling in this population. This study sought to examine the efficacy of brief intervention strategies. Design: Randomized trial. Setting: College campuses. Participants: A total of 117 college student problem and pathological gamblers. Interventions: Students were assigned randomly to: an assessment-only control, 10 minutes of brief advice, one session of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) or one session of MET, plus three sessions of cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT). The three interventions were designed to reduce gambling. Measurements: Gambling was assessed at baseline, week 6 and month 9 using the Addiction Severity Index–gambling (ASI-G) module, which also assesses days and dollars wagered. Findings: Compared to the assessment-only condition, those receiving any intervention had significant decreases in ASI-G scores and days and dollars wagered over time. The MET condition decreased significantly ASI-G scores and dollars wagered over time, and increased the odds of a clinically significant reduction in gambling at the 9-month follow-up relative to the assessment-only condition, even after controlling for baseline indices that could impact outcomes. The Brief Advice and MET+CBT conditions had benefits on some, but not all, indices of gambling. None of the interventions differed significantly from one another. Conclusions:   These results suggest the efficacy of brief interventions for reducing gambling problems in college students.
";"Brief motivational interventions for college student problem gamblers";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02652.x";"Addiction";"Petry, 2009";"Petry_2009_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_6_NA_mi_ao_advice_ao"
"205";"Petry, 2016";"mi";"cau";"NA";"cau";0;0,171202370048633;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";1;2,6;66;1;1,8;69;7,8;2,8;66;7,7;2,6;69;2016;"88";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"41.9";28;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Rash, C. J., & Alessi, S. M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(10), 874-886.";"10.1037/ccp0000127";"Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of brief gambling treatments in patients attending substance abuse treatment clinics. Method: Substance abuse treatment patients with gambling problems (N = 217) were randomly assigned to a 10- to 15-min brief psychoeducation gambling intervention; a 10- to 15-min brief advice intervention addressing gambling norms, risk factors, and methods to prevent additional problems; or 4 50-min sessions of motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy for reducing gambling (MET + CBT). Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline and throughout 24 months. Results: In the sample as a whole, days and dollars wagered and gambling problems decreased markedly from baseline through Month 5; thereafter, reductions in dollars wagered and gambling problems continued to decrease modestly but significantly, and days gambled remained constant. Brief advice significantly reduced days gambled between baseline and Month 5 relative to brief psychoeducation. The MET + CBT condition engendered no benefit beyond brief advice in terms of days gambled but did lead to more precipitous reductions in dollars gambled and problems experienced in the initial 5 months, and greater clinically significant improvements in gambling in both the short and long term. MET + CBT also resulted in initial decreases in self-reported alcohol use and problems but did not differentially impact self-reported illicit drug use or submission of positive samples. Conclusions: Gambling problems tend to dissipate over time regardless of the intervention applied, but offering MET + CBT was more efficacious in decreasing gambling than providing a brief single session intervention.";"A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-33917-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2016";"Petry_2016_msd_sogs_followup_88_NA_mi_cau_NA_cau"
"206";"Petry, 2016";"mi";"cau";"NA";"NA";-0,0405657231020841;0,171220168914757;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";5,6;2,6;66;5,7;2,3;69;7,8;2,8;66;7,7;2,6;69;2016;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"41.9";28;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Rash, C. J., & Alessi, S. M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(10), 874-886.";"10.1037/ccp0000127";"Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of brief gambling treatments in patients attending substance abuse treatment clinics. Method: Substance abuse treatment patients with gambling problems (N = 217) were randomly assigned to a 10- to 15-min brief psychoeducation gambling intervention; a 10- to 15-min brief advice intervention addressing gambling norms, risk factors, and methods to prevent additional problems; or 4 50-min sessions of motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy for reducing gambling (MET + CBT). Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline and throughout 24 months. Results: In the sample as a whole, days and dollars wagered and gambling problems decreased markedly from baseline through Month 5; thereafter, reductions in dollars wagered and gambling problems continued to decrease modestly but significantly, and days gambled remained constant. Brief advice significantly reduced days gambled between baseline and Month 5 relative to brief psychoeducation. The MET + CBT condition engendered no benefit beyond brief advice in terms of days gambled but did lead to more precipitous reductions in dollars gambled and problems experienced in the initial 5 months, and greater clinically significant improvements in gambling in both the short and long term. MET + CBT also resulted in initial decreases in self-reported alcohol use and problems but did not differentially impact self-reported illicit drug use or submission of positive samples. Conclusions: Gambling problems tend to dissipate over time regardless of the intervention applied, but offering MET + CBT was more efficacious in decreasing gambling than providing a brief single session intervention.";"A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-33917-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2016";"Petry_2016_msd_sogs_post_8_NA_mi_cau_NA_NA"
"207";"Petry, 2016";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";0;176672910972061;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";1;1,8;67;1;1,8;60;7,9;3,9;82;7,7;2,6;69;2016;"88";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"41.9";28;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Rash, C. J., & Alessi, S. M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(10), 874-886.";"10.1037/ccp0000127";"Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of brief gambling treatments in patients attending substance abuse treatment clinics. Method: Substance abuse treatment patients with gambling problems (N = 217) were randomly assigned to a 10- to 15-min brief psychoeducation gambling intervention; a 10- to 15-min brief advice intervention addressing gambling norms, risk factors, and methods to prevent additional problems; or 4 50-min sessions of motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy for reducing gambling (MET + CBT). Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline and throughout 24 months. Results: In the sample as a whole, days and dollars wagered and gambling problems decreased markedly from baseline through Month 5; thereafter, reductions in dollars wagered and gambling problems continued to decrease modestly but significantly, and days gambled remained constant. Brief advice significantly reduced days gambled between baseline and Month 5 relative to brief psychoeducation. The MET + CBT condition engendered no benefit beyond brief advice in terms of days gambled but did lead to more precipitous reductions in dollars gambled and problems experienced in the initial 5 months, and greater clinically significant improvements in gambling in both the short and long term. MET + CBT also resulted in initial decreases in self-reported alcohol use and problems but did not differentially impact self-reported illicit drug use or submission of positive samples. Conclusions: Gambling problems tend to dissipate over time regardless of the intervention applied, but offering MET + CBT was more efficacious in decreasing gambling than providing a brief single session intervention.";"A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-33917-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2016";"Petry_2016_msd_sogs_followup_88_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"208";"Petry, 2016";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-227403769487848;168407583046404;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";5;3,6;75;5,7;2,3;66;7,9;3,9;82;7,7;2,6;69;2016;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"41.9";28;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Rash, C. J., & Alessi, S. M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(10), 874-886.";"10.1037/ccp0000127";"Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of brief gambling treatments in patients attending substance abuse treatment clinics. Method: Substance abuse treatment patients with gambling problems (N = 217) were randomly assigned to a 10- to 15-min brief psychoeducation gambling intervention; a 10- to 15-min brief advice intervention addressing gambling norms, risk factors, and methods to prevent additional problems; or 4 50-min sessions of motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy for reducing gambling (MET + CBT). Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline and throughout 24 months. Results: In the sample as a whole, days and dollars wagered and gambling problems decreased markedly from baseline through Month 5; thereafter, reductions in dollars wagered and gambling problems continued to decrease modestly but significantly, and days gambled remained constant. Brief advice significantly reduced days gambled between baseline and Month 5 relative to brief psychoeducation. The MET + CBT condition engendered no benefit beyond brief advice in terms of days gambled but did lead to more precipitous reductions in dollars gambled and problems experienced in the initial 5 months, and greater clinically significant improvements in gambling in both the short and long term. MET + CBT also resulted in initial decreases in self-reported alcohol use and problems but did not differentially impact self-reported illicit drug use or submission of positive samples. Conclusions: Gambling problems tend to dissipate over time regardless of the intervention applied, but offering MET + CBT was more efficacious in decreasing gambling than providing a brief single session intervention.";"A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-33917-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2016";"Petry_2016_msd_sogs_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"209";"Petry, 2016";"mi";"cau";"NA";"NA";0,214873071943564;0,171701057448577;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";15,2;5,9;66;14;5,2;69;19,4;5,3;66;16,8;5,2;69;2016;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"41.9";28;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Rash, C. J., & Alessi, S. M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(10), 874-886.";"10.1037/ccp0000127";"Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of brief gambling treatments in patients attending substance abuse treatment clinics. Method: Substance abuse treatment patients with gambling problems (N = 217) were randomly assigned to a 10- to 15-min brief psychoeducation gambling intervention; a 10- to 15-min brief advice intervention addressing gambling norms, risk factors, and methods to prevent additional problems; or 4 50-min sessions of motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy for reducing gambling (MET + CBT). Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline and throughout 24 months. Results: In the sample as a whole, days and dollars wagered and gambling problems decreased markedly from baseline through Month 5; thereafter, reductions in dollars wagered and gambling problems continued to decrease modestly but significantly, and days gambled remained constant. Brief advice significantly reduced days gambled between baseline and Month 5 relative to brief psychoeducation. The MET + CBT condition engendered no benefit beyond brief advice in terms of days gambled but did lead to more precipitous reductions in dollars gambled and problems experienced in the initial 5 months, and greater clinically significant improvements in gambling in both the short and long term. MET + CBT also resulted in initial decreases in self-reported alcohol use and problems but did not differentially impact self-reported illicit drug use or submission of positive samples. Conclusions: Gambling problems tend to dissipate over time regardless of the intervention applied, but offering MET + CBT was more efficacious in decreasing gambling than providing a brief single session intervention.";"A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-33917-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2016";"Petry_2016_msd_tlfb-freq_post_8_NA_mi_cau_NA_NA"
"210";"Petry, 2016";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-94660650005822;167956874742337;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";13,5;5,3;75;14;5,2;66;18;4,5;82;16,8;5,2;69;2016;"8";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"41.9";28;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Rash, C. J., & Alessi, S. M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(10), 874-886.";"10.1037/ccp0000127";"Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of brief gambling treatments in patients attending substance abuse treatment clinics. Method: Substance abuse treatment patients with gambling problems (N = 217) were randomly assigned to a 10- to 15-min brief psychoeducation gambling intervention; a 10- to 15-min brief advice intervention addressing gambling norms, risk factors, and methods to prevent additional problems; or 4 50-min sessions of motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy for reducing gambling (MET + CBT). Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline and throughout 24 months. Results: In the sample as a whole, days and dollars wagered and gambling problems decreased markedly from baseline through Month 5; thereafter, reductions in dollars wagered and gambling problems continued to decrease modestly but significantly, and days gambled remained constant. Brief advice significantly reduced days gambled between baseline and Month 5 relative to brief psychoeducation. The MET + CBT condition engendered no benefit beyond brief advice in terms of days gambled but did lead to more precipitous reductions in dollars gambled and problems experienced in the initial 5 months, and greater clinically significant improvements in gambling in both the short and long term. MET + CBT also resulted in initial decreases in self-reported alcohol use and problems but did not differentially impact self-reported illicit drug use or submission of positive samples. Conclusions: Gambling problems tend to dissipate over time regardless of the intervention applied, but offering MET + CBT was more efficacious in decreasing gambling than providing a brief single session intervention.";"A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-33917-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2016";"Petry_2016_msd_tlfb-freq_post_8_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"211";"Petry, 2016";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-630794464785432;176717239936858;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";6,6;8,8;67;7,1;6,7;60;18;4,5;82;16,8;5,2;69;2016;"88";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"41.9";28;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Rash, C. J., & Alessi, S. M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(10), 874-886.";"10.1037/ccp0000127";"Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of brief gambling treatments in patients attending substance abuse treatment clinics. Method: Substance abuse treatment patients with gambling problems (N = 217) were randomly assigned to a 10- to 15-min brief psychoeducation gambling intervention; a 10- to 15-min brief advice intervention addressing gambling norms, risk factors, and methods to prevent additional problems; or 4 50-min sessions of motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy for reducing gambling (MET + CBT). Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline and throughout 24 months. Results: In the sample as a whole, days and dollars wagered and gambling problems decreased markedly from baseline through Month 5; thereafter, reductions in dollars wagered and gambling problems continued to decrease modestly but significantly, and days gambled remained constant. Brief advice significantly reduced days gambled between baseline and Month 5 relative to brief psychoeducation. The MET + CBT condition engendered no benefit beyond brief advice in terms of days gambled but did lead to more precipitous reductions in dollars gambled and problems experienced in the initial 5 months, and greater clinically significant improvements in gambling in both the short and long term. MET + CBT also resulted in initial decreases in self-reported alcohol use and problems but did not differentially impact self-reported illicit drug use or submission of positive samples. Conclusions: Gambling problems tend to dissipate over time regardless of the intervention applied, but offering MET + CBT was more efficacious in decreasing gambling than providing a brief single session intervention.";"A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-33917-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2016";"Petry_2016_msd_tlfb-freq_followup_88_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"212";"Petry, 2016";"mi";"cau";"NA";"cau";0,207774685892571;0,171668697160272;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"tlfb - freq";8,5;6,7;66;7,1;6,7;69;19,4;5,3;66;16,8;5,2;69;2016;"88";"follow up";"ind";"ind";"us";"41.9";28;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Petry, N. M., Rash, C. J., & Alessi, S. M. (2016). A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(10), 874-886.";"10.1037/ccp0000127";"Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy of brief gambling treatments in patients attending substance abuse treatment clinics. Method: Substance abuse treatment patients with gambling problems (N = 217) were randomly assigned to a 10- to 15-min brief psychoeducation gambling intervention; a 10- to 15-min brief advice intervention addressing gambling norms, risk factors, and methods to prevent additional problems; or 4 50-min sessions of motivational enhancement therapy plus cognitive behavior therapy for reducing gambling (MET + CBT). Gambling and related problems were assessed at baseline and throughout 24 months. Results: In the sample as a whole, days and dollars wagered and gambling problems decreased markedly from baseline through Month 5; thereafter, reductions in dollars wagered and gambling problems continued to decrease modestly but significantly, and days gambled remained constant. Brief advice significantly reduced days gambled between baseline and Month 5 relative to brief psychoeducation. The MET + CBT condition engendered no benefit beyond brief advice in terms of days gambled but did lead to more precipitous reductions in dollars gambled and problems experienced in the initial 5 months, and greater clinically significant improvements in gambling in both the short and long term. MET + CBT also resulted in initial decreases in self-reported alcohol use and problems but did not differentially impact self-reported illicit drug use or submission of positive samples. Conclusions: Gambling problems tend to dissipate over time regardless of the intervention applied, but offering MET + CBT was more efficacious in decreasing gambling than providing a brief single session intervention.";"A randomized controlled trial of brief interventions for problem gambling in substance abuse treatment patients.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2016-33917-001";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Petry, 2016";"Petry_2016_msd_tlfb-freq_followup_88_NA_mi_cau_NA_cau"
"213";"Rosen, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,257249497559575;0,201111358138123;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"asi";0,26;0,27;45;0,33;0,27;54;0,44;0,22;46;0,46;0,21;56;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"32.5";13;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Rosen, L. A., Weinstock, J., & Peter, S. C. (2020). A Randomized Clinical Trial Exploring Gambling Attitudes, Barriers to Treatment, and Efficacy of a Brief Motivational Intervention Among Ex‐Offenders with Disordered Gambling. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 65(5), 1646-1655.";"10.1111/1556-4029.14476";"Correctional populations are disproportionately burdened by disordered gambling; yet, problem awareness is minimal among both offenders and professionals within the criminal justice system. The aims of the current study were twofold: (i) to examine gambling attitudes and problem awareness among ex-offenders, and (ii) to determine the efficacy of a brief online gambling intervention for ex-offenders. Participants (N = 126) were ex-offenders on probation and parole. Gambling attitudes, attitudes toward treatment, and disorder gambling status were assessed. Disordered gamblers (n = 102) were randomly assigned to (i) a brief intervention plus referral to treatment or (ii) referral to treatment only, and these individuals were re-assessed at a 30-day follow-up. Lifetime disordered gambling was highly prevalent (86%) in the ex-offender sample, and providing information regarding disordered gambler status and referral to treatment was effective in decreasing gambling attitudes, as well as gambling severity and frequency. The current study has direct implications for treatment and intervention efforts among ex-offenders with disordered gambling and yields a greater understanding of attitudes toward gambling among ex-offenders.";"A Randomized Clinical Trial Exploring Gambling Attitudes, Barriers to Treatment, and Efficacy of a Brief Motivational Intervention Among Ex-Offenders with Disordered Gambling";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1556-4029.14476";"Journal of Forensic Sciences";"Rosen, 2020";"Rosen_2020_msd_asi_post_4_NA_pfi_ao_NA_NA"
"214";"Rosen, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,237017349603296;0,200985753021719;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";4,04;6,19;45;5,85;8,56;54;6,93;7,48;46;7,54;8,64;56;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"32.5";13;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Rosen, L. A., Weinstock, J., & Peter, S. C. (2020). A Randomized Clinical Trial Exploring Gambling Attitudes, Barriers to Treatment, and Efficacy of a Brief Motivational Intervention Among Ex‐Offenders with Disordered Gambling. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 65(5), 1646-1655.";"10.1111/1556-4029.14476";"Correctional populations are disproportionately burdened by disordered gambling; yet, problem awareness is minimal among both offenders and professionals within the criminal justice system. The aims of the current study were twofold: (i) to examine gambling attitudes and problem awareness among ex-offenders, and (ii) to determine the efficacy of a brief online gambling intervention for ex-offenders. Participants (N = 126) were ex-offenders on probation and parole. Gambling attitudes, attitudes toward treatment, and disorder gambling status were assessed. Disordered gamblers (n = 102) were randomly assigned to (i) a brief intervention plus referral to treatment or (ii) referral to treatment only, and these individuals were re-assessed at a 30-day follow-up. Lifetime disordered gambling was highly prevalent (86%) in the ex-offender sample, and providing information regarding disordered gambler status and referral to treatment was effective in decreasing gambling attitudes, as well as gambling severity and frequency. The current study has direct implications for treatment and intervention efforts among ex-offenders with disordered gambling and yields a greater understanding of attitudes toward gambling among ex-offenders.";"A Randomized Clinical Trial Exploring Gambling Attitudes, Barriers to Treatment, and Efficacy of a Brief Motivational Intervention Among Ex-Offenders with Disordered Gambling";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1556-4029.14476";"Journal of Forensic Sciences";"Rosen, 2020";"Rosen_2020_msd_global-freq_post_4_NA_pfi_ao_NA_NA"
"215";"Rosen, 2020";"pfi";"ao";"NA";"NA";0,015211240115648;0,200281597155571;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";1494;1514,26;45;1469,35;1681,77;54;4458,43;4757,13;46;3563;3716,81;56;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"us";"32.5";13;1;0;0;1;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Rosen, L. A., Weinstock, J., & Peter, S. C. (2020). A Randomized Clinical Trial Exploring Gambling Attitudes, Barriers to Treatment, and Efficacy of a Brief Motivational Intervention Among Ex‐Offenders with Disordered Gambling. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 65(5), 1646-1655.";"10.1111/1556-4029.14476";"Correctional populations are disproportionately burdened by disordered gambling; yet, problem awareness is minimal among both offenders and professionals within the criminal justice system. The aims of the current study were twofold: (i) to examine gambling attitudes and problem awareness among ex-offenders, and (ii) to determine the efficacy of a brief online gambling intervention for ex-offenders. Participants (N = 126) were ex-offenders on probation and parole. Gambling attitudes, attitudes toward treatment, and disorder gambling status were assessed. Disordered gamblers (n = 102) were randomly assigned to (i) a brief intervention plus referral to treatment or (ii) referral to treatment only, and these individuals were re-assessed at a 30-day follow-up. Lifetime disordered gambling was highly prevalent (86%) in the ex-offender sample, and providing information regarding disordered gambler status and referral to treatment was effective in decreasing gambling attitudes, as well as gambling severity and frequency. The current study has direct implications for treatment and intervention efforts among ex-offenders with disordered gambling and yields a greater understanding of attitudes toward gambling among ex-offenders.";"A Randomized Clinical Trial Exploring Gambling Attitudes, Barriers to Treatment, and Efficacy of a Brief Motivational Intervention Among Ex-Offenders with Disordered Gambling";"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1556-4029.14476";"Journal of Forensic Sciences";"Rosen, 2020";"Rosen_2020_msd_global-intensity_post_4_NA_pfi_ao_NA_NA"
"216";"So, 2020";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-730066735140876;142038711809881;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";8,6;10,2;87;9,5;7,4;98;13,1;8,9;96;12;7,9;101;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"eas";"36.299999999999997";21;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"So, R., Furukawa, T. A., Matsushita, S., Baba, T., Matsuzaki, T., Furuno, S., ... & Higuchi, S. (2020). Unguided chatbot-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention for problem gamblers through messaging app: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1391-1407.";"10.1007/s10899-020-09935-4";"Internet-delivered intervention may be an acceptable alternative for the more than 90% of problem gamblers who are reluctant to seek face-to-face support. Thus, we aimed to (1) develop a low-dropout unguided intervention named GAMBOT integrated with a messaging app; and (2) investigate its effect. The present study was a randomised, quadruple-blind, controlled trial. We set pre-to-post change in the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) as the primary outcome and pre-to-post change in the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS) as a secondary outcome. Daily monitoring, personalised feedback, and private messages based on cognitive behavioural theory were offered to participants in the intervention group through a messaging app for 28 days (GAMBOT). Participants in the control group received biweekly messages only for assessments for 28 days (assessments only). A total of 197 problem gamblers were included in the primary analysis. We failed to demonstrate a significant between-group difference in the primary outcome (PGSI − 1.14, 95% CI − 2.75 to 0.47, p = 0.162) but in the secondary outcome (G-SAS − 3.14, 95% CI − 0.24 to − 6.04, p = 0.03). Only 6.7% of the participants dropped out during follow-up and 77% of the GAMBOT group participants (74/96) continued to participate in the intervention throughout the 28-day period. Integrating intervention into a chatbot feature on a frequently used messaging app shows promise in helping to overcome the high dropout rate of unguided internet-delivered interventions. More effective and sophisticated contents delivered by a chatbot should be sought to engage over 90% of problem gamblers who are reluctant to seek face-to-face support.";"Unguided Chatbot-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Intervention for Problem Gamblers Through Messaging App: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-020-09935-4";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"So, 2020";"So_2020_msd_global-freq_post_4_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"217";"So, 2020";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-230466522037504;14199583053978;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";146947;543014;87;143602;263134;98;205798;420110;96;174208;233286;101;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"eas";"36.299999999999997";21;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"So, R., Furukawa, T. A., Matsushita, S., Baba, T., Matsuzaki, T., Furuno, S., ... & Higuchi, S. (2020). Unguided chatbot-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention for problem gamblers through messaging app: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1391-1407.";"10.1007/s10899-020-09935-4";"Internet-delivered intervention may be an acceptable alternative for the more than 90% of problem gamblers who are reluctant to seek face-to-face support. Thus, we aimed to (1) develop a low-dropout unguided intervention named GAMBOT integrated with a messaging app; and (2) investigate its effect. The present study was a randomised, quadruple-blind, controlled trial. We set pre-to-post change in the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) as the primary outcome and pre-to-post change in the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS) as a secondary outcome. Daily monitoring, personalised feedback, and private messages based on cognitive behavioural theory were offered to participants in the intervention group through a messaging app for 28 days (GAMBOT). Participants in the control group received biweekly messages only for assessments for 28 days (assessments only). A total of 197 problem gamblers were included in the primary analysis. We failed to demonstrate a significant between-group difference in the primary outcome (PGSI − 1.14, 95% CI − 2.75 to 0.47, p = 0.162) but in the secondary outcome (G-SAS − 3.14, 95% CI − 0.24 to − 6.04, p = 0.03). Only 6.7% of the participants dropped out during follow-up and 77% of the GAMBOT group participants (74/96) continued to participate in the intervention throughout the 28-day period. Integrating intervention into a chatbot feature on a frequently used messaging app shows promise in helping to overcome the high dropout rate of unguided internet-delivered interventions. More effective and sophisticated contents delivered by a chatbot should be sought to engage over 90% of problem gamblers who are reluctant to seek face-to-face support.";"Unguided Chatbot-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Intervention for Problem Gamblers Through Messaging App: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-020-09935-4";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"So, 2020";"So_2020_msd_global-intensity_post_4_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"218";"So, 2020";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-150597379576918;142193636148503;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"gsas";22;10,8;87;25,2;10,3;98;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"eas";"36.299999999999997";21;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"So, R., Furukawa, T. A., Matsushita, S., Baba, T., Matsuzaki, T., Furuno, S., ... & Higuchi, S. (2020). Unguided chatbot-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention for problem gamblers through messaging app: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1391-1407.";"10.1007/s10899-020-09935-4";"Internet-delivered intervention may be an acceptable alternative for the more than 90% of problem gamblers who are reluctant to seek face-to-face support. Thus, we aimed to (1) develop a low-dropout unguided intervention named GAMBOT integrated with a messaging app; and (2) investigate its effect. The present study was a randomised, quadruple-blind, controlled trial. We set pre-to-post change in the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) as the primary outcome and pre-to-post change in the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS) as a secondary outcome. Daily monitoring, personalised feedback, and private messages based on cognitive behavioural theory were offered to participants in the intervention group through a messaging app for 28 days (GAMBOT). Participants in the control group received biweekly messages only for assessments for 28 days (assessments only). A total of 197 problem gamblers were included in the primary analysis. We failed to demonstrate a significant between-group difference in the primary outcome (PGSI − 1.14, 95% CI − 2.75 to 0.47, p = 0.162) but in the secondary outcome (G-SAS − 3.14, 95% CI − 0.24 to − 6.04, p = 0.03). Only 6.7% of the participants dropped out during follow-up and 77% of the GAMBOT group participants (74/96) continued to participate in the intervention throughout the 28-day period. Integrating intervention into a chatbot feature on a frequently used messaging app shows promise in helping to overcome the high dropout rate of unguided internet-delivered interventions. More effective and sophisticated contents delivered by a chatbot should be sought to engage over 90% of problem gamblers who are reluctant to seek face-to-face support.";"Unguided Chatbot-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Intervention for Problem Gamblers Through Messaging App: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-020-09935-4";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"So, 2020";"So_2020_msd_gsas_post_4_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"219";"So, 2020";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-984917394707338;142077755714146;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"pgsi";12,2;7,4;87;13,4;6,1;98;16,9;5;96;16,7;4,5;101;2020;"4";"post";"ind";"ind";"eas";"36.299999999999997";21;1;1;0;1;3;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"So, R., Furukawa, T. A., Matsushita, S., Baba, T., Matsuzaki, T., Furuno, S., ... & Higuchi, S. (2020). Unguided chatbot-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention for problem gamblers through messaging app: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Gambling Studies, 36(4), 1391-1407.";"10.1007/s10899-020-09935-4";"Internet-delivered intervention may be an acceptable alternative for the more than 90% of problem gamblers who are reluctant to seek face-to-face support. Thus, we aimed to (1) develop a low-dropout unguided intervention named GAMBOT integrated with a messaging app; and (2) investigate its effect. The present study was a randomised, quadruple-blind, controlled trial. We set pre-to-post change in the Problem Gambling Severity Index (PGSI) as the primary outcome and pre-to-post change in the Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale (G-SAS) as a secondary outcome. Daily monitoring, personalised feedback, and private messages based on cognitive behavioural theory were offered to participants in the intervention group through a messaging app for 28 days (GAMBOT). Participants in the control group received biweekly messages only for assessments for 28 days (assessments only). A total of 197 problem gamblers were included in the primary analysis. We failed to demonstrate a significant between-group difference in the primary outcome (PGSI − 1.14, 95% CI − 2.75 to 0.47, p = 0.162) but in the secondary outcome (G-SAS − 3.14, 95% CI − 0.24 to − 6.04, p = 0.03). Only 6.7% of the participants dropped out during follow-up and 77% of the GAMBOT group participants (74/96) continued to participate in the intervention throughout the 28-day period. Integrating intervention into a chatbot feature on a frequently used messaging app shows promise in helping to overcome the high dropout rate of unguided internet-delivered interventions. More effective and sophisticated contents delivered by a chatbot should be sought to engage over 90% of problem gamblers who are reluctant to seek face-to-face support.";"Unguided Chatbot-Delivered Cognitive Behavioural Intervention for Problem Gamblers Through Messaging App: A Randomised Controlled Trial";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-020-09935-4";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"So, 2020";"So_2020_msd_pgsi_post_4_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"220";"Sylvain, 1997";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-310757930482569;544941265650854;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"dsm-iii";1,1;0,9;14;5,7;1,8;15;7,3;0,9;14;7,1;0,9;15;1997;"NA";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"40.200000000000003";0;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J. M. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: a controlled study. Journal of consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 727-732.";"10.1037/0022-006X.65.5.727";"This study evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral treatment package for pathological gambling. Twenty-nine men who met criteria for pathological gambling in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., revised; DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) were randomly assigned to treatment or wait-list control. The treatment included 4 components: (a) cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions about gambling, (b) problem-solving training, (c) social skills training, and (d) relapse prevention. The dependent variables were the South Oaks Gambling Screen, perception of control, frequency of gambling, perceived self-efficacy, desire to gamble, and number of DSM-III-R criteria met by participants. Posttest results indicated highly significant changes in the treatment group on all outcome measures, and analysis of data from 6- and 12-month follow-ups revealed maintenance of therapeutic gains. Recommendations for clinical interventions are discussed and focus on the cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions of gambling. ";"Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: A controlled study.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006x.65.5.727";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Sylvain, 1997";"Sylvain_1997_msd_dsm-iii_post_NA_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"221";"Sylvain, 1997";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-135652060259411;402724258023046;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";0,2;0,6;14;2,1;1,8;15;0,8;1,2;14;1,5;1,7;15;1997;"NA";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"40.200000000000003";0;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J. M. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: a controlled study. Journal of consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 727-732.";"10.1037/0022-006X.65.5.727";"This study evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral treatment package for pathological gambling. Twenty-nine men who met criteria for pathological gambling in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., revised; DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) were randomly assigned to treatment or wait-list control. The treatment included 4 components: (a) cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions about gambling, (b) problem-solving training, (c) social skills training, and (d) relapse prevention. The dependent variables were the South Oaks Gambling Screen, perception of control, frequency of gambling, perceived self-efficacy, desire to gamble, and number of DSM-III-R criteria met by participants. Posttest results indicated highly significant changes in the treatment group on all outcome measures, and analysis of data from 6- and 12-month follow-ups revealed maintenance of therapeutic gains. Recommendations for clinical interventions are discussed and focus on the cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions of gambling. ";"Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: A controlled study.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006x.65.5.727";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Sylvain, 1997";"Sylvain_1997_msd_global-freq_post_NA_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"222";"Sylvain, 1997";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-989113416021983;383833504415848;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";8,57;23,16;14;188;243,84;15;23,29;53,48;14;99,67;127,5;15;1997;"NA";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"40.200000000000003";0;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J. M. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: a controlled study. Journal of consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 727-732.";"10.1037/0022-006X.65.5.727";"This study evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral treatment package for pathological gambling. Twenty-nine men who met criteria for pathological gambling in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., revised; DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) were randomly assigned to treatment or wait-list control. The treatment included 4 components: (a) cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions about gambling, (b) problem-solving training, (c) social skills training, and (d) relapse prevention. The dependent variables were the South Oaks Gambling Screen, perception of control, frequency of gambling, perceived self-efficacy, desire to gamble, and number of DSM-III-R criteria met by participants. Posttest results indicated highly significant changes in the treatment group on all outcome measures, and analysis of data from 6- and 12-month follow-ups revealed maintenance of therapeutic gains. Recommendations for clinical interventions are discussed and focus on the cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions of gambling. ";"Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: A controlled study.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006x.65.5.727";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Sylvain, 1997";"Sylvain_1997_msd_global-intensity_post_NA_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"223";"Sylvain, 1997";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-263105712917571;499812887329131;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";2,7;3,7;14;13;3,9;15;12,6;2,3;14;13,1;2,9;15;1997;"NA";"post";"ind";"ind";"can";"40.200000000000003";0;0;0;0;0;0;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Sylvain, C., Ladouceur, R., & Boisvert, J. M. (1997). Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: a controlled study. Journal of consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 727-732.";"10.1037/0022-006X.65.5.727";"This study evaluated the efficacy of a cognitive-behavioral treatment package for pathological gambling. Twenty-nine men who met criteria for pathological gambling in accordance with the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (3rd ed., revised; DSM-III-R; American Psychiatric Association, 1987) were randomly assigned to treatment or wait-list control. The treatment included 4 components: (a) cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions about gambling, (b) problem-solving training, (c) social skills training, and (d) relapse prevention. The dependent variables were the South Oaks Gambling Screen, perception of control, frequency of gambling, perceived self-efficacy, desire to gamble, and number of DSM-III-R criteria met by participants. Posttest results indicated highly significant changes in the treatment group on all outcome measures, and analysis of data from 6- and 12-month follow-ups revealed maintenance of therapeutic gains. Recommendations for clinical interventions are discussed and focus on the cognitive correction of erroneous perceptions of gambling. ";"Cognitive and behavioral treatment of pathological gambling: A controlled study.";"https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2F0022-006x.65.5.727";"Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology";"Sylvain, 1997";"Sylvain_1997_msd_sogs_post_NA_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"224";"Toneatto, 2014";"cbt";"wl";"NA";"NA";-114079843866459;487557885603909;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"dsm-iv";3,44;3;9;6,71;2,43;9;6,67;1,73;9;7,89;0,78;9;2014;"7";"post";"grp";"grp";"can";"44.1";44;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Toneatto, T., Pillai, S., & Courtice, E. L. (2014). Mindfulness-enhanced cognitive behavior therapy for problem gambling: A controlled pilot study. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 12(2), 197-205.";"10.1007/s11469-014-9481-6";"In recent years, mindfulness meditation has shown to be a promising approach for alleviating disability and dysfunction associated with a wide range of medical and psychiatric conditions. To date, there have been no controlled clinical studies of mindfulness for problem gambling (beyond case studies) despite the well-established presence of irrational beliefs and cognitive distortions which would suggest that mindfulness interventions would be particularly suitable. In the present study, a group, five-session, mindfulness intervention was integrated into an empirically-effective cognitive-behavioral therapy for problem gamblers. Compared to a wait list control the mindfulness intervention significantly reduced the severity of gambling, gambling urges and psychiatric symptoms at end-of-treatment. At the 3-month follow-up combining the results of both groups the results were maintained. In addition, a significant decrease in the proportion of the sample meeting criteria for pathological gambling was found. Those individuals who reported some mindfulness practice post-treatment showed significantly better clinical outcomes than did those who did not report any mindfulness practice suggesting that mindfulness did play a role in the outcomes observed. Taking into consideration the multiple methodological limitations of this pilot study there is sufficient evidence to further investigate the potential efficacy of mindfulness interventions for problem gambling.";"Mindfulness-Enhanced Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Problem Gambling: A Controlled Pilot Study";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11469-014-9481-6";"International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction";"Toneatto, 2014";"Toneatto_2014_msd_dsm-iv_post_7_NA_cbt_wl_NA_NA"
"225";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,0572168944330728;0,405506798456162;"msd";"su";"NA";"audit-c";2,1;2,09;10;2,2;1,3;13;3,7;2,63;22;3,4;1,63;21;2023;"6";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_audit-c_followup_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"226";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,330609351651546;0,369028081952705;"msd";"su";"NA";"audit-c";2,8;2,37;12;3,7;2,82;17;3,7;2,63;22;3,4;1,63;21;2023;"6";"post";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_audit-c_post_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"227";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";0;0,405419035832951;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"gad-7";3,7;4,23;10;3,7;5,89;13;10,5;5,38;22;9,5;5,24;21;2023;"6";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_gad-7_followup_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"228";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,309220275552763;0,36870824605351;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"gad-7";6,8;4,43;12;8,5;5,89;17;10,5;5,38;22;9,5;5,24;21;2023;"6";"post";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_gad-7_post_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"229";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";0,138757222462964;0,405934909086922;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"nods";2,44;3,13;10;2;3;13;6,2;2,11;22;6,2;1,91;21;2023;"6";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_nods_followup_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"230";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,134065740808052;0,366888387263266;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"nods";3,33;3,75;12;3,82;3,41;17;6,2;2,11;22;6,2;1,91;21;2023;"6";"post";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_nods_post_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"231";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";0,103775345505389;0,405707666083165;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"pgsi";10;7,35;10;9,2;7,49;13;20,5;3,84;22;21,7;3,84;21;2023;"6";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_pgsi_followup_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"232";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,0662731544181981;0,405536774811286;"msd";"depression";"NA";"phq-9";5,2;6,18;10;5,6;5,53;13;16,5;6,12;22;14,8;5,71;21;2023;"6";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_phq-9_followup_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"233";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,0891400777288296;0,36665269378105;"msd";"depression";"NA";"phq-9";8,6;6,73;12;9,2;6,41;17;16,5;6,12;22;14,8;5,71;21;2023;"6";"post";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_phq-9_post_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"234";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";0,148292919437715;0,366982765549435;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";544;1732;12;356;707;17;1095;1728;22;1221;2442;21;2023;"6";"post";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_tlfb-intensity_post_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"235";"Wall, 2023";"cbt";"ao";"NA";"NA";-0,236808678063159;0,406919757668595;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"tlfb - intensity";49,2;72,9;10;70,4;95,1;13;1095;1728;22;1221;2442;21;2023;"6";"follow up";"ind";"gsh";"eu";"43.7";49;1;1;0;0;2;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wall, H., Magnusson, K., Hellner, C., Andersson, G., Jayaram-Lindström, N., & Rosendahl, I. (2023). The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 9(1), 26.";"10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7";"Background and aims: Gambling helplines are a natural way of first contact for individuals with gambling problems. However, few studies have evaluated the feasibility and effectiveness of brief interventions in a gambling helpline. To reduce this knowledge gap, this study evaluated the feasibility of an online cognitive behavioral therapy (ICBT) program in the context of a gambling helpline as a first step towards a full-scale RCT. Design: This is a two-group parallel randomized controlled pilot trial where the participants were randomized to
either a brief four-module ICBT program (n = 22) or a control group (n = 21). Participants were followed up weekly during the intervention, post intervention, and 6 weeks upon completion of intervention. Participants: A total of 43 self-identified individuals with gambling problems (scoring 3 or more on the Problem Gambling Severity Index) were recruited via the Swedish national gambling helpline, 59% females, mean age 43.7 years. Measurements: Feasibility of the procedure and intervention (i.e., recruitment pace, attrition, program engagement, and satisfaction) were the primary outcomes; treatment effect (net gambling losses) was the secondary outcome. Results: Approximately 2 participants per week were randomized, and retention was low, with 47% lost to follow-up at the 6-week follow-up time-point. Most participants engaged in the online modules (86%) and rated their overall satisfaction with the program as high (7.5 out of 10). Both groups decreased their weekly gambling losses at both follow-up time-points, but the between-group comparisons were inconclusive. Conclusion: It is not advisable to conduct a full-scale RCT based on the results from this pilot study. Future studies in a gambling helpline should consider interventions that are more suited to be incorporated in a gambling helpline and identify ways to increase participant engagement.";"The evaluation of a brief ICBT program with therapist support for individuals with gambling problems in the context of a gambling helpline: a randomized pilot trial";"https://pilotfeasibilitystudies.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40814-023-01257-7/peer-review";"Pilot and Feasibility Studies";"Wall, 2023";"Wall_2023_msd_tlfb-intensity_followup_6_NA_cbt_ao_NA_NA"
"236";"Wong, 2015";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-568653239877402;357394777185378;"msd";"anxiety";"NA";"dass-a";2,29;2,43;15;4,44;4,55;16;3,79;3,14;15;4,19;3,41;16;2015;"10";"post";"grp";"grp";"eas";"NA";0;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wong, D. F. K., Chung, C. L. P., Wu, J., Tang, J., & Lau, P. (2015). A preliminary study of an integrated and culturally attuned cognitive behavioral group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 1015-1027.";"10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Chinese people may have a higher rate of gambling problems than other cultural groups. However, there are very few clinical outcome studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of clinical interventions for helping Chinese gamblers. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been found to be effective for helping problem gamblers to significantly reduce their gambling problems in western countries. Very few CBT clinical trials have been conducted with the Chinese populations, and the results were masked by methodological limitations. This preliminary study attempted to test the effectiveness of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. This study adopted a randomized control design and 38 participants were allocated randomly to the experimental condition (n = 18) and control condition (n = 20). The experimental group received 10 weekly CBT group sessions and individual counseling services while control group only received the individual counseling services. Significant decreases in gambling severity and frequencies of gambling were found in the experimental group. The findings also showed that a change in gambling cognitions predicted the changes in gambling severity and gambling urge while a change in gambling severity was also linked to a change in depression. Preliminary evidence highlights the potential benefits of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. However, a more vigorous research design with a larger sample is needed to provide solid evidence of the effectiveness of the model for Chinese problem gamblers.";"A Preliminary Study of an Integrated and Culturally Attuned Cognitive Behavioral Group Treatment for Chinese Problem Gamblers in Hong Kong";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Wong, 2015";"Wong_2015_msd_dass-a_post_10_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"237";"Wong, 2015";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-170973699992035;350694912855012;"msd";"depression";"NA";"dass-d";3,57;2,95;15;4,25;4,57;16;5,21;4,77;15;4,88;3,74;16;2015;"10";"post";"grp";"grp";"eas";"NA";0;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wong, D. F. K., Chung, C. L. P., Wu, J., Tang, J., & Lau, P. (2015). A preliminary study of an integrated and culturally attuned cognitive behavioral group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 1015-1027.";"10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Chinese people may have a higher rate of gambling problems than other cultural groups. However, there are very few clinical outcome studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of clinical interventions for helping Chinese gamblers. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been found to be effective for helping problem gamblers to significantly reduce their gambling problems in western countries. Very few CBT clinical trials have been conducted with the Chinese populations, and the results were masked by methodological limitations. This preliminary study attempted to test the effectiveness of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. This study adopted a randomized control design and 38 participants were allocated randomly to the experimental condition (n = 18) and control condition (n = 20). The experimental group received 10 weekly CBT group sessions and individual counseling services while control group only received the individual counseling services. Significant decreases in gambling severity and frequencies of gambling were found in the experimental group. The findings also showed that a change in gambling cognitions predicted the changes in gambling severity and gambling urge while a change in gambling severity was also linked to a change in depression. Preliminary evidence highlights the potential benefits of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. However, a more vigorous research design with a larger sample is needed to provide solid evidence of the effectiveness of the model for Chinese problem gamblers.";"A Preliminary Study of an Integrated and Culturally Attuned Cognitive Behavioral Group Treatment for Chinese Problem Gamblers in Hong Kong";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Wong, 2015";"Wong_2015_msd_dass-d_post_10_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"238";"Wong, 2015";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-141486239976643;350482973401764;"msd";"gambling";"duration";"global - duration";2,47;1,73;15;2,8;2,68;16;3,2;2,24;15;3,07;2,46;16;2015;"10";"post";"grp";"grp";"eas";"NA";0;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wong, D. F. K., Chung, C. L. P., Wu, J., Tang, J., & Lau, P. (2015). A preliminary study of an integrated and culturally attuned cognitive behavioral group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 1015-1027.";"10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Chinese people may have a higher rate of gambling problems than other cultural groups. However, there are very few clinical outcome studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of clinical interventions for helping Chinese gamblers. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been found to be effective for helping problem gamblers to significantly reduce their gambling problems in western countries. Very few CBT clinical trials have been conducted with the Chinese populations, and the results were masked by methodological limitations. This preliminary study attempted to test the effectiveness of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. This study adopted a randomized control design and 38 participants were allocated randomly to the experimental condition (n = 18) and control condition (n = 20). The experimental group received 10 weekly CBT group sessions and individual counseling services while control group only received the individual counseling services. Significant decreases in gambling severity and frequencies of gambling were found in the experimental group. The findings also showed that a change in gambling cognitions predicted the changes in gambling severity and gambling urge while a change in gambling severity was also linked to a change in depression. Preliminary evidence highlights the potential benefits of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. However, a more vigorous research design with a larger sample is needed to provide solid evidence of the effectiveness of the model for Chinese problem gamblers.";"A Preliminary Study of an Integrated and Culturally Attuned Cognitive Behavioral Group Treatment for Chinese Problem Gamblers in Hong Kong";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Wong, 2015";"Wong_2015_msd_global-duration_post_10_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"239";"Wong, 2015";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-302259649816671;352120719030309;"msd";"gambling";"frequency";"global - freq";2,86;1,92;15;3,53;2,36;16;4,27;2,21;15;4,33;2,61;16;2015;"10";"post";"grp";"grp";"eas";"NA";0;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wong, D. F. K., Chung, C. L. P., Wu, J., Tang, J., & Lau, P. (2015). A preliminary study of an integrated and culturally attuned cognitive behavioral group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 1015-1027.";"10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Chinese people may have a higher rate of gambling problems than other cultural groups. However, there are very few clinical outcome studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of clinical interventions for helping Chinese gamblers. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been found to be effective for helping problem gamblers to significantly reduce their gambling problems in western countries. Very few CBT clinical trials have been conducted with the Chinese populations, and the results were masked by methodological limitations. This preliminary study attempted to test the effectiveness of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. This study adopted a randomized control design and 38 participants were allocated randomly to the experimental condition (n = 18) and control condition (n = 20). The experimental group received 10 weekly CBT group sessions and individual counseling services while control group only received the individual counseling services. Significant decreases in gambling severity and frequencies of gambling were found in the experimental group. The findings also showed that a change in gambling cognitions predicted the changes in gambling severity and gambling urge while a change in gambling severity was also linked to a change in depression. Preliminary evidence highlights the potential benefits of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. However, a more vigorous research design with a larger sample is needed to provide solid evidence of the effectiveness of the model for Chinese problem gamblers.";"A Preliminary Study of an Integrated and Culturally Attuned Cognitive Behavioral Group Treatment for Chinese Problem Gamblers in Hong Kong";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Wong, 2015";"Wong_2015_msd_global-freq_post_10_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"240";"Wong, 2015";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";0;350022053495501;"msd";"gambling";"intensity";"global - intensity";2,6;2,41;15;2,6;2,41;16;3,4;2,85;15;4,07;3,17;16;2015;"10";"post";"grp";"grp";"eas";"NA";0;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wong, D. F. K., Chung, C. L. P., Wu, J., Tang, J., & Lau, P. (2015). A preliminary study of an integrated and culturally attuned cognitive behavioral group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 1015-1027.";"10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Chinese people may have a higher rate of gambling problems than other cultural groups. However, there are very few clinical outcome studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of clinical interventions for helping Chinese gamblers. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been found to be effective for helping problem gamblers to significantly reduce their gambling problems in western countries. Very few CBT clinical trials have been conducted with the Chinese populations, and the results were masked by methodological limitations. This preliminary study attempted to test the effectiveness of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. This study adopted a randomized control design and 38 participants were allocated randomly to the experimental condition (n = 18) and control condition (n = 20). The experimental group received 10 weekly CBT group sessions and individual counseling services while control group only received the individual counseling services. Significant decreases in gambling severity and frequencies of gambling were found in the experimental group. The findings also showed that a change in gambling cognitions predicted the changes in gambling severity and gambling urge while a change in gambling severity was also linked to a change in depression. Preliminary evidence highlights the potential benefits of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. However, a more vigorous research design with a larger sample is needed to provide solid evidence of the effectiveness of the model for Chinese problem gamblers.";"A Preliminary Study of an Integrated and Culturally Attuned Cognitive Behavioral Group Treatment for Chinese Problem Gamblers in Hong Kong";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Wong, 2015";"Wong_2015_msd_global-intensity_post_10_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"
"241";"Wong, 2015";"cbt";"cau";"NA";"NA";-345546728562018;350022328599122;"msd";"gambling";"severity";"sogs";10,4;5,22;15;10,38;6;16;14,38;3,61;15;11,19;5,26;16;2015;"10";"post";"grp";"grp";"eas";"NA";0;0;0;0;1;1;NA;NA;NA;NA;NA;"Wong, D. F. K., Chung, C. L. P., Wu, J., Tang, J., & Lau, P. (2015). A preliminary study of an integrated and culturally attuned cognitive behavioral group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. Journal of Gambling Studies, 31(3), 1015-1027.";"10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Chinese people may have a higher rate of gambling problems than other cultural groups. However, there are very few clinical outcome studies that have demonstrated the effectiveness of clinical interventions for helping Chinese gamblers. Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has been found to be effective for helping problem gamblers to significantly reduce their gambling problems in western countries. Very few CBT clinical trials have been conducted with the Chinese populations, and the results were masked by methodological limitations. This preliminary study attempted to test the effectiveness of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. This study adopted a randomized control design and 38 participants were allocated randomly to the experimental condition (n = 18) and control condition (n = 20). The experimental group received 10 weekly CBT group sessions and individual counseling services while control group only received the individual counseling services. Significant decreases in gambling severity and frequencies of gambling were found in the experimental group. The findings also showed that a change in gambling cognitions predicted the changes in gambling severity and gambling urge while a change in gambling severity was also linked to a change in depression. Preliminary evidence highlights the potential benefits of an integrated and culturally attuned CBT group treatment for Chinese problem gamblers in Hong Kong. However, a more vigorous research design with a larger sample is needed to provide solid evidence of the effectiveness of the model for Chinese problem gamblers.";"A Preliminary Study of an Integrated and Culturally Attuned Cognitive Behavioral Group Treatment for Chinese Problem Gamblers in Hong Kong";"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10899-014-9457-2";"Journal of Gambling Studies";"Wong, 2015";"Wong_2015_msd_sogs_post_10_NA_cbt_cau_NA_NA"