Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline optimizations #594

Open
aleks-ivanov opened this issue May 20, 2021 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #595
Open

GitHub Actions CI/CD pipeline optimizations #594

aleks-ivanov opened this issue May 20, 2021 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #595
Labels
type:infrastructure Core back-end work which includes quality work, code refactor, tests, CI/CD etc

Comments

@aleks-ivanov
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @baywet and @darrelmiller 🙂

Yesterday when we got the notification about the merge, we decided to give the pipeline a glance and see if anything we've learned during the past month could be applied to optimize it.

In the connected PR we've added detailed descriptions of the changes, including one very curious finding about the tests.

@baywet
Copy link
Member

baywet commented May 20, 2021

are you referring to this PR or to something else? I don't see any additional comment so far #580

@aleks-ivanov
Copy link
Contributor Author

are you referring to this PR or to something else? I don't see any additional comment so far #580

I haven't created the PR yet, because I am still writing some descriptions.
I will know for next time to make the issue and PR the other way around to avoid confusion. Sorry about that. 🙂

@adhiambovivian adhiambovivian added the type:infrastructure Core back-end work which includes quality work, code refactor, tests, CI/CD etc label Apr 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type:infrastructure Core back-end work which includes quality work, code refactor, tests, CI/CD etc
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants