You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am experiencing an issue with the Thunderbird Labels Plugin, which started occurring after I updated to Roundcube Webmail version 1.6.8. Since the update, I have noticed that the plugin automatically marks unread emails with the label "LABEL1" after a certain period if I leave them unread. This behavior is random and only affects incoming emails that I have not yet read.
To clarify, I have not configured any rules or settings within the plugin that would cause it to apply this label automatically, so this seems to be an unintended action related to the recent update.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
Receive an incoming email.
Leave the email unread in the inbox.
After some time, the email is automatically marked with "LABEL1" without any user action.
This automatic labeling disrupts my workflow and causes confusion as I am unable to determine why specific emails are being labeled without any intervention.
Any insights or solutions to prevent this automatic labeling behavior would be greatly appreciated.
Hello,
I am experiencing an issue with the Thunderbird Labels Plugin, which started occurring after I updated to Roundcube Webmail version 1.6.8. Since the update, I have noticed that the plugin automatically marks unread emails with the label "LABEL1" after a certain period if I leave them unread. This behavior is random and only affects incoming emails that I have not yet read.
To clarify, I have not configured any rules or settings within the plugin that would cause it to apply this label automatically, so this seems to be an unintended action related to the recent update.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
This automatic labeling disrupts my workflow and causes confusion as I am unable to determine why specific emails are being labeled without any intervention.
Any insights or solutions to prevent this automatic labeling behavior would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you for your help! @mike-kfed
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: