Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Local wave activity (LWA) v.s. local available potential energy (LAPE) #5

Open
miniufo opened this issue Jul 19, 2022 · 0 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@miniufo
Copy link
Owner

miniufo commented Jul 19, 2022

After a careful reading of those papers, especially Holliday and McIntyre (1981, JFM), McIntyre and Shepherd (1987, JFM), Roullet and Klein (2009, JFM), Kang and Fringer (2010, JPO), and Huang and Nakamura (2016, JAS), I am pretty sure that local available potential energy (LAPE) is an vertical equivalence to impulse-Casimir wave activity (ICWA) in the horizontal plane. In Huang and Nakamura (2016, JAS), ICWA, and hence LAPE, is clearly demonstrated to be different from local wave activity (LWA). However, in the vertical plane where stratification is usually strong enough to suppress vertical displacement, LWA is quite similar to LAPE in this small-amplitude limit.

So I need to change the calculation of local APE from that of LWA. Local APE is conceptually equivalent to ICWA.

@miniufo miniufo self-assigned this Jul 19, 2022
@miniufo miniufo added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request labels Jul 19, 2022
@miniufo miniufo added this to xgrads Jul 19, 2022
@miniufo miniufo removed this from xgrads Jul 19, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant