Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Report task gets rescheduled when schedule is specifically set to None #3868

Open
jpbruinsslot opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #3869
Open

Report task gets rescheduled when schedule is specifically set to None #3868

jpbruinsslot opened this issue Nov 20, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #3869
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working mula Issues related to the scheduler

Comments

@jpbruinsslot
Copy link
Contributor

Report task gets rescheduled when schedule is specifically set to None. For the report scheduler we want to have task only be rescheduled when explicitly a schedule (cron expression) is provided. This is normal behaviour of a BoefjeScheduler, a tasks gets rescheduled daily when it hasn't gotten a schedule from which the ReportScheduler is derived.

@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot added bug Something isn't working mula Issues related to the scheduler labels Nov 20, 2024
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot added this to KAT Nov 20, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Incoming features / Need assessment in KAT Nov 20, 2024
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot moved this from Incoming features / Need assessment to In Progress in KAT Nov 20, 2024
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot linked a pull request Nov 20, 2024 that will close this issue
9 tasks
@jpbruinsslot jpbruinsslot moved this from In Progress to Review in KAT Nov 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working mula Issues related to the scheduler
Projects
Status: Review
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant