title | openreview | abstract | layout | series | publisher | issn | id | month | tex_title | firstpage | lastpage | page | order | cycles | bibtex_author | author | date | address | container-title | volume | genre | issued | extras | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Training and Cross-Validating Machine Learning Pipelines with Limited Memory |
4LkaPSHUQQ |
While automated machine learning (AutoML) can save human labor in finding well-performing pipelines, it often suffers from two problems: overfitting and using excessive resources. Unfortunately, the solutions are often at odds: cross-validation helps reduce overfitting at the expense of more resources; conversely, preprocessing on a separate compute cluster and then cross-validating only the final predictor saves resources at the expense of more overfitting. This paper shows how to train and cross-validate entire pipelines on a single moderate machine with limited memory by using monoids, which are associative, thus providing a flexible way for handling large data one batch at a time. To facilitate AutoML, our approach is designed to support the common sklearn APIs used by many AutoML systems for pipelines, training, cross-validation, and several operators. Abstracted behind those APIs, our approach uses task graphs to extend the benefits of monoids from operators to pipelines, and provides a multi-backend implementation. Overall, our approach lets users train and cross-validate pipelines on simple and inexpensive compute infrastructure. |
inproceedings |
Proceedings of Machine Learning Research |
PMLR |
2640-3498 |
hirzel24a |
0 |
Training and Cross-Validating Machine Learning Pipelines with Limited Memory |
13/1 |
25 |
13/1-25 |
13 |
false |
Hirzel, Martin and Kate, Kiran and Mandel, Louis and Shinnar, Avraham |
|
2024-10-09 |
Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Automated Machine Learning |
256 |
inproceedings |
|