Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Can't read unmatched phenotypes #248

Closed
mellybelly opened this issue Jun 5, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Can't read unmatched phenotypes #248

mellybelly opened this issue Jun 5, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@mellybelly
Copy link

The unmatched phenotypes come up in a box, but cannot be expanded to read long labels. I think expando/contracto at the bottom of the matched ones listed would be better.

See also #130 #245 and #247

cantread

@harryhoch
Copy link
Collaborator

@yuanzhou , would it be possible to revise the layout to account for the lengths of the labels?

@yuanzhou
Copy link
Collaborator

yuanzhou commented Jun 6, 2016

In the current version, the width of the unmatched box is calculated based on the actual width of the whole grid area. And a fixed length of the label is specified in CSS in order to align all the labels vertically. Showing the full length of each label will probably mess up the vertical alignment unless we show fewer columns with more space of each column. But this won't guarantee when there's a really long label and will create more gaps and longer list vertically.

Would it be a quick fix if I add title attribute to each linked label so we'll see the full label name on mouse hover?

@harryhoch
Copy link
Collaborator

would it not work to do fewer columns if labels are longer?

@yuanzhou
Copy link
Collaborator

yuanzhou commented Jun 6, 2016

Fixed and showing full label now. As a side effect, the labels won't be aligned vertically, which I think is fine.

capture

@yuanzhou yuanzhou closed this as completed Jun 6, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants