You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have a header-only library that is a bunch of .hpp files.
The tests are .cpp files of course.
When mull frontend generates the mutations for each .cpp, it seems to generate mutations in the .cpp test files as well.
Generating mutations in the .cpp test files is ok in principle.
But given that one has finite time and mutation testing is very time consuming, I would like to prioritize the mutations in the actual library, not in the test code.
Is this possible? can I pass a pattern of files (in this case headers, mylib/include/*.hpp) in which mutations are allowed?
Does it make sense?
If it is not possible now, can it be a good feature request?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have a header-only library that is a bunch of .hpp files.
The tests are .cpp files of course.
When mull frontend generates the mutations for each .cpp, it seems to generate mutations in the .cpp test files as well.
Generating mutations in the .cpp test files is ok in principle.
But given that one has finite time and mutation testing is very time consuming, I would like to prioritize the mutations in the actual library, not in the test code.
Is this possible? can I pass a pattern of files (in this case headers, mylib/include/*.hpp) in which mutations are allowed?
Does it make sense?
If it is not possible now, can it be a good feature request?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: