We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We're currently relying on Vault, hosted on HashiCorp Cloud Platform, to read secrets for our GHA workflows. For example:
nebari/.github/workflows/test_aws_integration.yaml
Lines 61 to 70 in 855aa14
In the previous months, our Vault configuration has broken, resulting in failing GHA jobs when trying to read secrets. Here's a recent example: https://github.com/nebari-dev/nebari/actions/runs/11628815929/job/32384643624#step:5:32
I think we could simplify our secret management logic and use GitHub secrets instead.
Migrating from Vault to GitHub secrets would reduce the maintenance burden and avoid jobs failing because of a broken Vault configuration.
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We talked about this in the maintainers meeting this morning and were in favor of this change.
Sorry, something went wrong.
smokestacklightnin
No branches or pull requests
Feature description
We're currently relying on Vault, hosted on HashiCorp Cloud Platform, to read secrets for our GHA workflows. For example:
nebari/.github/workflows/test_aws_integration.yaml
Lines 61 to 70 in 855aa14
In the previous months, our Vault configuration has broken, resulting in failing GHA jobs when trying to read secrets. Here's a recent example: https://github.com/nebari-dev/nebari/actions/runs/11628815929/job/32384643624#step:5:32
I think we could simplify our secret management logic and use GitHub secrets instead.
Value and/or benefit
Migrating from Vault to GitHub secrets would reduce the maintenance burden and avoid jobs failing because of a broken Vault configuration.
Anything else?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: