You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been going through a few RFCs, but then came across the discussions here and here, which left me wondering - that a lot of these don't really reflect the designs as they are implemented right now.
I have been wondering if there was a way to determine which RFCs are retained only for historical context, and which are accurately reflect current implementation.
Any pointers would be super useful, I'm super new and find neon very interesting - please ignore the naivety of my questions :)
PS: thank you for tech_design_rfc label, it's is very helpful.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I've been going through a few RFCs, but then came across the discussions here and here, which left me wondering - that a lot of these don't really reflect the designs as they are implemented right now.
I have been wondering if there was a way to determine which RFCs are retained only for historical context, and which are accurately reflect current implementation.
Any pointers would be super useful, I'm super new and find neon very interesting - please ignore the naivety of my questions :)
PS: thank you for tech_design_rfc label, it's is very helpful.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions