You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The test does a tight loop of reads for many minutes: should this be in test_runner/performance instead? Even if we adjust the timeout on this test, I worry that a test like this will destabilize others when run in parallel.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
## Problem
See #9961
Current implementation of prefetch buffer resize doesn't correctly
handle in-flight requests
## Summary of changes
1. Fix index of entry we should wait for if new prefetch buffer size is
smaller than number of in-flight requests.
2. Correctly set flush position
Co-authored-by: Konstantin Knizhnik <[email protected]>
## Problem
`test_prefetch` is flaky
(#9961), but if it passes,
the run time is less than 30 seconds — we don't need an extended timeout
for it.
## Summary of changes
- Remove extended test timeout for `test_prefetch`
The test does a tight loop of reads for many minutes: should this be in test_runner/performance instead? Even if we adjust the timeout on this test, I worry that a test like this will destabilize others when run in parallel.
Discussed with @hlinnaka and @knizhnik, it's needed for correctness test at this moment. Making it less heavy will decrease the chance that it will catch the actual problem
Considering that and that it's not flaky atm, closing. Feel free to reopen if you still see a problem
Test was added in https://github.com/neondatabase/neon/pull/9847/files
Is failing with a timeout, about 10% of the time.
The test does a tight loop of reads for many minutes: should this be in
test_runner/performance
instead? Even if we adjust the timeout on this test, I worry that a test like this will destabilize others when run in parallel.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: