You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@corneliusroemer experimented with IQ-TREE's constraint tree option to prevent IQ-TREE from putting clades in the wrong place for NextClade reference trees. This seems like a good way to ensure correct trees especially in 6m builds that may be lacking context sequences.
Either you get (synthetic) prototypical sequences for each clade with constant names, like 2A, 2A.1 etc. (similar to the SC2 workflow) and hand code a short Newick tree with the right topology
Or you generate a constraint tree using actual sequence names based on the topology as revealed through clade-hierarchies or handcoded in a newick tree that's read in by Biopython.Phylo
@corneliusroemer experimented with IQ-TREE's constraint tree option to prevent IQ-TREE from putting clades in the wrong place for NextClade reference trees. This seems like a good way to ensure correct trees especially in 6m builds that may be lacking context sequences.
One issue brought up in initial Slack thread:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: