Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Describing Expressiveness of Ontologies #4

Open
AleSteB opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Describing Expressiveness of Ontologies #4

AleSteB opened this issue Aug 2, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Important Important issues that should get priority in addressing

Comments

@AleSteB
Copy link
Member

AleSteB commented Aug 2, 2023

Classification of ontologies with regards to expressivity (OWL2 EL/QL/RL)
https://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-profiles/#Introduction

OWL2 EL - for ontologies that contain very large numbers of properties and/or classes

OWL2 QL - for ontologies that use very large volumes of instance data, and where query answering is the most important reasoning task.

OWL2 RL - for ontologies that require scalable reasoning without sacrificing too much expressive power.

@AleSteB
Copy link
Member Author

AleSteB commented Sep 14, 2023

Also further classification reasonable regarding domain ontology VS application ontology etc?
But hard criteria for this to be looked up

@AleSteB
Copy link
Member Author

AleSteB commented Sep 14, 2023

The I-ADOPT Ontology-Classes could be reused for our classification of the ontologies!

https://i-adopt.github.io/

@AleSteB AleSteB added enhancement New feature or request Important Important issues that should get priority in addressing labels Sep 14, 2023
@AleSteB AleSteB pinned this issue Sep 14, 2023
@HendrikBorgelt
Copy link
Member

I-adopt has very few classes with constrain, entity, variable, variable set and property, therfore i do not think that classifying the ontologies with these terms will be sufficient.

@AleSteB
Copy link
Member Author

AleSteB commented Sep 14, 2023

Yes, I agree! However, we might use it anyway and extend the classifications of it to obtain an "ontology about ontologies"?

@AleSteB
Copy link
Member Author

AleSteB commented Sep 14, 2023

As StroemPhi explained in Slack, MOD and/or OMO could also be promising ontologies for this purpose.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request Important Important issues that should get priority in addressing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants