Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Future plans and ideas #69

Open
heinwol opened this issue Jan 11, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #91
Open

Future plans and ideas #69

heinwol opened this issue Jan 11, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #91

Comments

@heinwol
Copy link
Contributor

heinwol commented Jan 11, 2024

There isn't a discussions page here, so I'm opening an issue.

I would like to ask the maintainers about how do they see the future of the project. What's going to be done and what does definitely not line up with the idea of comma. Or is it more or less in finished state and you just want to maintain it (as it is now)?

I ask that because I have some ideas, but I'm not sure if they fit in here.

  1. I want to add the ability to add a bunch of packages at once in shell mode. Like , -s package1 package2 package3. Yes, it looks a lot like nix-shell -p ..., but, if I guess correctly, it can also get packages by specifying a command name and not the package name. Secondly, it can use other inputs along with nixpkgs as long as they're indexed. And most importantly (for me) it drops you back to the shell you were in and not into bash.
  2. Result caching. Calling nix-index each time you write , command takes a lot of time and therefore is annoying. Especially if you called command just 3 seconds ago

I also have some other vague thoughts but here are the main points of my interest.

@Jeidnx Jeidnx linked a pull request Nov 13, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant