Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make lack of implict copy very clear. Add .copy() function. #14

Open
nmwsharp opened this issue Aug 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

Make lack of implict copy very clear. Add .copy() function. #14

nmwsharp opened this issue Aug 12, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@nmwsharp
Copy link
Owner

Right now the main PlyData class cannot be implicitly copied. This is probably the right behavior; doing so is likely a mistake.

However, we can improve the situation in two ways

  • Explicitly delete the copy constructor, to make it clear that the behavior is intentional
  • Provide a .copy() function for the few situations where one really does want to explicitly copy
@nmwsharp nmwsharp added enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers labels Aug 12, 2019
@GMudide
Copy link

GMudide commented Jul 12, 2023

I'm interested

@GMudide
Copy link

GMudide commented Jul 15, 2023

looks like no active contributors and maintainers ?

@GMudide
Copy link

GMudide commented Jul 19, 2023

pull request - #37

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants
@GMudide @nmwsharp and others