You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ideally, this should match the top 2 candidates statewide (and the table at least should have flex to add another if there's a prominent additional candidate?). We found a few edge case examples where the candidates shown appeared to match the top 2 candidates in the first county/township alphabetically. There was odd behavior both with 0 results in (defers to dem/rep candidate, which can be an issue if the independent is the incumbent or otherwise prominent) and with results counting (shows the current top 2 candidates in that jurisdiction, who many not be leading nationally).
Tickets from @abidishajia's quick patches for Maine Senate for examples and more context:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
alykat
added
data
Tasks related to data feeds or external data
graphics
Related to results graphics / compontents
bug
Something isn't working
labels
Nov 6, 2024
Ideally, this should match the top 2 candidates statewide (and the table at least should have flex to add another if there's a prominent additional candidate?). We found a few edge case examples where the candidates shown appeared to match the top 2 candidates in the first county/township alphabetically. There was odd behavior both with 0 results in (defers to dem/rep candidate, which can be an issue if the independent is the incumbent or otherwise prominent) and with results counting (shows the current top 2 candidates in that jurisdiction, who many not be leading nationally).
Tickets from @abidishajia's quick patches for Maine Senate for examples and more context:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: