-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add swc as an option to use with node/nestjs builder #8900
Comments
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it hasn't had any recent activity. It will be closed in 14 days if no further activity occurs. |
Up |
Looks like its coming to NestCLI so it would be great for Nx to also provide it as an option https://twitter.com/kammysliwiec/status/1664192006019506178?s=20 |
bump |
I think many of us would love to see this. |
Up |
NestJS CLI shipped this in v10 https://trilon.io/blog/nestjs-10-is-now-available#nestjs-%EF%B8%8F-swc |
Given that the latest version of Nx seems to be slowing down the NestJS development process, I was wondering if there are any plans to integrate SWC to potentially improve performance. 🤔 |
Is there anyone willing to work on this? |
+1 on this. Adding support for SWC would be great for NestJs apps. I've managed to get SWC working with NestJs, but compilation fails on NX library imports. |
+1 |
+1. This will make development experience so much better. |
Is it possible to use this |
Up. |
I thought I made it working with nest start -b swc, but when I tried to import an nx generated library, the paths were not compiled at all |
NestJS so slow in dev since upgrade.... |
+1 |
Up |
BTW is there separate issue talking about slow NestJS watch mode? It's seriously annoying. My pretty small app takes 20-30 seconds to recompile every time something changes. It also takes a lot of time for deamon to even notice something changed. It used to be almost instant in previous NX versions. I can provide link to my repo if necessary. |
Same @DavidFencl |
☝️ |
🆙 |
Can't believe this is not ready yet. Seeing extremely slow compilation of Nest apps in newest NX versions makes me cry sometimes. This would solve it pretty easily. |
🆙 |
I got my NestJS working with SWC (p.s. I used 1. Install parts of SWC that you needed:
|
@c0dewriter can you make public repo with this? |
@c0dewriter thanks for these snippets. I can compile a new standalone NestJS app in NX, however imports from libs aren't working for me with this error at build time
|
This is the main issue here and probably why it takes so long. Executor do more stuff than just wrapping underlying tech (like swc). It also has to rewrite your imports depending on the command you run. If you want all the nice things that nx gives you for monorepo management you have to accept that you won't always be able to use latest and greatest from the framework that nx wraps. |
@pf1gura thanks for your insight. Given the solution above uses the existing '@nx/js:swc' executor I made an assumption that this executor would already handle imports from libs. @c0dewriter posted a potential solution, I tried it and gave feedback, I'm just keen for a solution because my NestJS build times have been very slow after the release of v10 and the nx monorepo I work with day to day has 6 different NestJS applications and the DX isn't great right now. |
If I recall correctly existing swc executor is for libraries only. You can use it in your shared TypeScript libraries to speed up library build times but final build of your application still has to go through node executor (which does not use swc) |
@wilson208 I'm actually seeing the same rootDir bug. Have you found a fix yet? |
@quesurifn @wilson208 and anyone else, is it possible that your build target names (of two interdependent libs) are different? This bug can appear if you are importing one buildable lib into the other, and the build target names are different. related: #11289 For anyone having that error, solution: #17798 (comment) |
I'm currently working on integrating SWC into my NestJS application using NX. In my setup, I have shared libraries that are non-buildable, so the solution you mentioned doesn't seem applicable in my case. Is there an alternative approach or workaround that could make this integration possible? |
There are many things being discussed in this thread. Let's try to keep it focused on the original request (supporting swc). Anyone with the |
@mandarini Indeed that was the issue. I encountered this with TS now. For some reason TS didn't trigger the same error until I did a complete refactor but I indeed did have circular dependencies that were two buildable libs referencing each other. The fix was to put them into one lib and then break them up with ts paths so semantically, at least, there is some differentiation. |
@ggagosh I would try looking even if they are not buildable. Also if you're using TS they are indeed buildable. I fixed mine from putting libs that imported each other into the same lib. |
I also used the https://github.com/pahen/madge tool to help find some circular deps issues that was blocking swc from being able to compile my projects |
+1 |
SWC support for NestJS apps is still required |
This issue was moved to a discussion.
You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →
Description
As swc-project/swc#3459 has fixed the use of legacy-decorators, it'd awesome to be able of use
swc
as compiler/bundler to reduce typescript compilation time 🚀Motivation
Reduce time of tsc.
Suggested Implementation
swc is used with @nrwl/js and others, use it with @nrwl/node (nestjs) too
Alternate Implementations
esbuild
doesn't supportlegacy decoratorsemitDecoratorMetadata
😢The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: