After studying this code and completing the corresponding exercises, you should be able to,
- Use High-Level Designs
[LO-HighLevelDesign]
- Use Event-Driven Programming
[LO-EventDriven]
- Use API Design
[LO-ApiDesign]
- Use Assertions
[LO-Assertions]
- Use Logging
[LO-Logging]
- Use Defensive Coding
[LO-DefensiveCoding]
- Use Build Automation
[LO-BuildAutomation]
- Use Continuous Integration
[LO-ContinuousIntegration]
- Use Code Coverage
[LO-CodeCoverage]
- Apply Test Case Design Heuristics
[LO-TestCaseDesignHeuristics]
- Write Integration Tests
[LO-IntegrationTests]
- Perform System Testing
[LO-SystemTesting]
- Automate GUI Testing
[LO-AutomateGuiTesting]
- Apply Design Patterns
[LO-DesignPatterns]
- Use Static Analysis
[LO-StaticAnalysis]
- Do Code Reviews
[LO-CodeReview]
Note how the Developer Guide describes the high-level design using an Architecture Diagrams and high-level sequence diagrams.
Note how the Developer Guide uses events to communicate with components
without needing a direct coupling. Also note how the EventsCenter
class acts as an event dispatcher to
facilitate communication between event creators and event consumers.
Note how components of AddressBook have well-defined APIs. For example, the API of the Logic
component
is given in the Logic.java
Resources
- A three-minutes video of designing architecture of and discovering component APIs for a Game of Tic-Tac-Toe.
Note how the AddressBook app uses Java assert
s to verify assumptions.
Resources
- Programming With Assertions - a guide from Oracle.
- How to enable assertions in Eclipse
-
Make sure assertions are enabled in Eclipse by forcing an assertion failure (e.g. add
assert false;
somewhere in the code and run the code to ensure the runtime reports an assertion failure). -
Add more assertions to AddressBook as you see fit.
Note how the AddressBook app uses Java's java.util.log
package to do logging.
Resources
- Tutorials
- Logging using java.util.logging - a tutorial by Jakob Jenkov
- Logging tutorial - a more detailed tutorial from Oracle.
- Logging best practices
Add more logging to AddressBook as you see fit.
Note how AddressBook uses the ReadOnly*
interfaces to prevent objects being modified by clients who are not
supposed to modify them.
Analyze the AddressBook code/design to identify,
- where defensive coding is used
- where the code can be more defensive
Note how the AddressBook app uses Gradle to automate build tasks.
Resources
- Tutorials
- Getting started with Gradle (Java) - a tutorial from the Gradle team
- Another tutorial - from TutorialPoint
- Use gradle to do these tasks (instructions are here) : Run all tests in headless mode, build the jar file.
- Note how the build script
build.gradle
file manages third party dependencies such as ControlsFx.
Update that file to manage a third-party library dependency.
Note how the AddressBook app uses Travis to perform Continuous Integration. ()
Resources
- Tutorials
- Getting started with Travis - a tutorial from the Travis team
- Set up Travis to perform CI on your own project.
Note how our CI server Travis uses Coveralls to report code coverage. ()
- Install the EclEmma Eclipse Plugin in your computer and use that to find code that is not covered by the tests.
The StringUtilTest.java
class gives some examples
of how to use Equivalence Partitions, Boundary Value Analysis, and Test Input Combination Heuristics to improve
the efficiency and effectiveness of test cases testing the
StringUtil.java
class.
- Find answers to these questions:
- What is an Equivalence Partition? How does it help to improve E&E of testing?
- What is Boundary Value Analysis? How does it help to improve E&E of testing?
- What are the heuristics that can be used when combining multiple test inputs?
- Use the test case design heuristics mentioned above to improve test cases in other places.
Consider the StorageManagerTest.java
class.
-
Test methods
prefsReadSave()
andaddressBookReadSave()
are integration tests. Note how they simply test if TheStorageManager
class is correctly wired to its dependencies. -
Test method
handleAddressBookChangedEvent_exceptionThrown_eventRaised()
is a unit test because it uses dependency injection to isolate the SUTStorageManger::handleAddressBookChangedEvent(...)
from its dependencies.
Compare the above with LogicManagerTest
.
Many of the tests in that class (e.g. execute_add_*
methods) tests are neither integration nor unit tests.
They are a integration + unit tests because they not only checks if the LogicManager is correctly wired to its
dependencies, but also checks the working of its dependencies. For example, the following two lines test the
the LogicManager
but also the Parser
.
@Test
public void execute_add_invalidArgsFormat() throws Exception {
...
assertCommandBehavior("add Valid Name 12345 e/[email protected] a/valid, address", expectedMessage);
assertCommandBehavior("add Valid Name p/12345 [email protected] a/valid, address", expectedMessage);
...
}
- Write a unit test for a a high-level methods somewhere in the code base.
- Write an integration test for the same method.
Note how tests below src/test/java/guitests
package
(e.g AddCommandTest.java
) are system tests because they test
the entire system end-to-end.
- Add some more system tests to the existing system tests.
Note how this project uses TextFX library to automate GUI testing, including headless GUI testing.
- Add some more automated GUI tests.
Here are some example design patterns used in the code base.
- Singleton Pattern :
EventsCenter.java
is Singleton class. Its single instance can be accessed using theEventsCenter.getInsance()
method. - Facade Pattern :
StorageManager.java
is not only shielding the internals of the Storage component from outsiders, it is mostly redirecting methods calls to its internal components (i.e. minimal logic in the class itself). Therefore,StorageManager
can be considered a Facade class. - Command Pattern : The
Command.java
and its sub classes implement the Command Pattern. - Observer Pattern : The event driven mechanism used by
this code base employs the Observer pattern.
For example, objects that are interested in events need to have the@Subscribe
annotation in the class (this is similar to implementing an<<Observer>>
interface) and register with theEventsCenter
. When something noteworthy happens, an event is raised and theEventsCenter
notifies all relevant subscribers. Unlike in the Observer pattern in which the<<Observerable>>
class is notifying all<<Observer>>
objects, here the<<Observable>>
classes simply raises an event and theEventsCenter
takes care of the notifications. - MVC Pattern :
- The 'View' part of the application is mostly in the
.fxml
files in thesrc/main/resources/view
folder. Model
component contains the 'Model'.- Sub classes of
UiPart
(e.g.PersonListPanel
) act as 'Controllers', each controlling some part of the UI and communicating with the 'Model' via aLogic
component which sits between the 'Controller' and the 'Model'.
- The 'View' part of the application is mostly in the
- Abstraction Occurrence Pattern : Not currently used in the app.
- Find other possible applications of the patterns to improve the current design. e.g. where else in the design can you apply the Singleton pattern?
- Discuss pros and cons of applying the pattern in each of the situations you found in the previous step.
- Learn other Gang of Four Design patterns to see if they are applicable to the app.
Note how this project uses the CheckStyle static analysis tool to confirm compliance with the coding standard.
Other popular Java static analysis tools:
- Install the CheckStyle Eclipse plugin and use it to detect coding standard violations.
- Note how some PRs in this project have been reviewed by other developers. Here is an example.
- Also not how we have used Codacy to do automate some part of the code review workload ()
Here are some things you can comment on when reviewing code:
- Read the code from the perspective of a new developer. Identify parts that are harder to understand and suggest improvements.
- Point out any coding standard violations.
- Suggest better names for methods/variables/classes.
- Point out unnecessary code duplications.
- Check if the comments, docs, tests have been updated to match the code change.
- Check for violation of relevant principles such as the SOLID principles.
- Point out where SLAP can be improved. e.g. methods that are too long or has too deep nesting.
- Suggest any other code quality improvements.
Resources
- Code Review Best Practices - Blog post by Kevin London
- Why Code Reviews Matter - An article by Atlassian
- Review a GitHub PR created by a team member.