diff --git a/dev/bench/data.js b/dev/bench/data.js index cea82d25b25..63d8a1abdb1 100644 --- a/dev/bench/data.js +++ b/dev/bench/data.js @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ window.BENCHMARK_DATA = { - "lastUpdate": 1723785861665, + "lastUpdate": 1723785936038, "repoUrl": "https://github.com/ocaml/dune", "entries": { "Melange Benchmark": [ @@ -191024,6 +191024,35 @@ window.BENCHMARK_DATA = { "unit": "seconds" } ] + }, + { + "commit": { + "author": { + "email": "me@rgrinberg.com", + "name": "Rudi Grinberg", + "username": "rgrinberg" + }, + "committer": { + "email": "noreply@github.com", + "name": "GitHub", + "username": "web-flow" + }, + "distinct": true, + "id": "36b12e2eb2d7d63f6aa8c0416208853e19499d86", + "message": "refactor: remove action runners from public dune (#10794)\n\nAction runners in this dune are a rather old version that it is very\r\nmuch out of date with the state of the actual feature and has many bugs\r\nand limitations that need a lot of upstreaming to fix. In its current\r\nstate, it does not provide any value to users of public dune.\r\n\r\nIf we ever want to upstream this feature, it will be easier to just do\r\nit from scratch anyway instead of resolving the conflicts against some\r\nold version. This is due to the fact that the action runner API with the\r\nengine is rather small and well defined.\r\n\r\nOnce we introduce a better abstraction for action execution (as we are\r\nindeed planning), it will be probably be even simpler to upstream action\r\nrunners.\r\n\r\nAll in all, we gain nothing on either team by keeping this dead weight\r\naround.\r\n\r\nSigned-off-by: Rudi Grinberg ", + "timestamp": "2024-08-16T13:12:22+08:00", + "tree_id": "d04368d1518f88238f8936aae135166eff2b18c2", + "url": "https://github.com/ocaml/dune/commit/36b12e2eb2d7d63f6aa8c0416208853e19499d86" + }, + "date": 1723785935101, + "tool": "customSmallerIsBetter", + "benches": [ + { + "name": "synthetic build time (cold, Linux)", + "value": "40.873772974279994", + "unit": "seconds" + } + ] } ], "Synthetic Watch Benchmark": [