Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic Inclusion fees #17

Open
janezpodhostnik opened this issue Feb 14, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #46
Open

Dynamic Inclusion fees #17

janezpodhostnik opened this issue Feb 14, 2022 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #46
Assignees
Labels
flip: governance Governance FLIP

Comments

@janezpodhostnik
Copy link
Contributor

janezpodhostnik commented Feb 14, 2022

https://github.com/onflow/flips/blob/main/governance/20221005-dynamic-inclusion-fee.md

@janezpodhostnik janezpodhostnik self-assigned this Feb 14, 2022
@pgebheim pgebheim transferred this issue from onflow/flow Oct 14, 2022
@pgebheim pgebheim changed the title FLIP: Inclusion fees PROTOCOL: Inclusion fees Oct 14, 2022
@pgebheim pgebheim changed the title PROTOCOL: Inclusion fees PROTOCOL: Dynamic Inclusion fees Oct 14, 2022
@pgebheim pgebheim linked a pull request Nov 2, 2022 that will close this issue
7 tasks
@jasamba
Copy link

jasamba commented Dec 9, 2022

@janezpodhostnik Is it still in proposed status?

@jasamba
Copy link

jasamba commented Jan 9, 2023

@jasamba follow up with @janezpodhostnik on the blocking issue

@KshitijChaudhary666 KshitijChaudhary666 moved this from Drafted to Implemented (In-Version) in FLIPs Tracker Aug 24, 2023
@KshitijChaudhary666 KshitijChaudhary666 moved this from Implemented (In-Version) to Rejected in FLIPs Tracker Aug 24, 2023
@KshitijChaudhary666 KshitijChaudhary666 changed the title PROTOCOL: Dynamic Inclusion fees Dynamic Inclusion fees Aug 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
flip: governance Governance FLIP
Projects
Status: Rejected
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants