Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advanced Selectors #166

Open
lukecampbell opened this issue May 8, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Advanced Selectors #166

lukecampbell opened this issue May 8, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@lukecampbell
Copy link
Member

This is a low priority.

For the first integration iteration of the new coverage model, ERDDAP is doing selectors at the application layer and it's a bit inefficient but still ok.

PyDAP gets a list of selectors in the OPeNDAP query which look like:

('time', '>=', '0.0')
('time', '<=', '3.1556736E9')
('temp', '>', '5')
('temp', '<', '7')

References:
http://www.opendap.org/pdf/ESE-RFC-004v1.1.pdf

@caseybryant
Copy link
Contributor

Can you look at the test cases in coverage_model/test/test_coverage_search.py? I think this might actually be what you want.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants