Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare two collections of the same dataset #45

Open
jpmckinney opened this issue Dec 3, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

Compare two collections of the same dataset #45

jpmckinney opened this issue Dec 3, 2019 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

For OCP's organizational targets, we track the number of publishers that have improved their publications. To do this using the DQT, we'd need to be able to either directly compare check results and/or aggregate check results into higher-level figures, to be able to determine, e.g. "publisher X improved" and "the improvement is accounted for by improvements on these specific checks, though the quality deteriorated on these other checks."

A dependency is having Kingfisher do scheduled collections, which is currently blocked by Kingfisher Views burning through hard drives (issues tracked in Trello).

Earlier feedback:

Charlie: I want to be able to compare DQT outputs over time. (+1: OH)
Charlie: I want to be able to automatically compare the current DQT results with a previous one e.g. a table with current results vs previous results and indication of changes. (+1: NP)

On a related note, Oscar mentioned:

This may go beyond the scope of the project but having some sort of benchmark would be helpful. The idea, if at all possible, would be to draw comparisons with other countries.

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member Author

From open-contracting-archive/pelican#20

a chart of objects per stage over time (by year) - as an analyst, I want to see objects published over time so that I understand how a publisher's content has evolved over time with respect to publishing across all stages of procurement.

@jpmckinney jpmckinney transferred this issue from open-contracting-archive/pelican Sep 14, 2021
@jpmckinney jpmckinney modified the milestones: Priority, Features Aug 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant