Is it necessary to dived by 200 first and times 200 behind? #1339
Answered
by
jin-s13
zyc573823770
asked this question in
Q&A
-
Hi, great work! However when I read detail about code processing data. I wonder is it necessary to dived by 200 here and times 200 here, it is a bit redundant |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Answered by
jin-s13
Apr 27, 2022
Replies: 1 comment
-
Because some datasets (mpii) directly provide scale/center, and they do not provide bbox. To make the whole pipeline consistent, we first divide it by 200. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Answer selected by
jin-s13
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Because some datasets (mpii) directly provide scale/center, and they do not provide bbox. To make the whole pipeline consistent, we first divide it by 200.