You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Per discussion in opencog/atomspace#2787 (comment) if a RocksDB database holds an atom type that the C++ code does not know about, then it should be auto-created in the atomspace. To make this possible, the RocksDB tables will need to store the atom inheritance hierarchy, which they do not currently do.
Perhaps this could be best achieved by formally defining new atom types in atomese!? (and then just storing the atomese!?)
Per discussion in opencog/atomspace#2787 (comment) if a RocksDB database holds an atom type that the C++ code does not know about, then it should be auto-created in the atomspace. To make this possible, the RocksDB tables will need to store the atom inheritance hierarchy, which they do not currently do.
Perhaps this could be best achieved by formally defining new atom types in atomese!? (and then just storing the atomese!?)
See also opencog/atomspace#2789
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: