Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validation consistency for condition names & references #319

Open
d-jeffery opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Validation consistency for condition names & references #319

d-jeffery opened this issue Aug 15, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@d-jeffery
Copy link
Contributor Author

@rhamzeh

With all 3 have different regexes here; the language version is the source of truth, right?

Are you concerned about a breaking change by restricting the condition name reference from 256 to 50 characters?

@d-jeffery d-jeffery changed the title Validation consistency Validation consistency for condition names & references Aug 15, 2024
@rhamzeh
Copy link
Member

rhamzeh commented Aug 15, 2024

Use {1,50}

@d-jeffery
Copy link
Contributor Author

Use {1,50}

What about the difference in the patterns?

[^\\s] vs [^:#@\\s] vs [^\\*\\s]

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants