Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Normative" and "Informative" reference in an ER #33

Open
cnreediii opened this issue Sep 6, 2019 · 1 comment
Open

"Normative" and "Informative" reference in an ER #33

cnreediii opened this issue Sep 6, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@cnreediii
Copy link

Since an ER is not an official OGC document (such as a standard), is there any reason to have only "normative references" in the References section? Seems to me that any reference for a given ER should be in the References section. Thus, no need to put "informative" references in the Bibliography. This would be a minor change to the template and use of the template.

@ghobona
Copy link
Contributor

ghobona commented Sep 18, 2019

I support the proposal by @cnreediii because it would bring the template in line with scientific papers, technical reports and other research documents.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants