-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Different per-band spatial resolutions #142
Comments
@jerstlouis We encountered a similar (if not the same) issue in the API-EDR. We chose, simple as possible, to return the data as stored, and the metadata of course reveals the correct resolution. If the requester wants control over the resolution of the returned data, we supported that in the |
Thank you @chris-little. Some of the main challenges here are:
Those specific issues might not have been relevant to EDR. |
@jerstlouis If those multiband coverages are being used with Index CRS, I would argue that is not a valid use - the CRS should be the same for all bands - otherwise it is a coverage collection. The onus is on the service providers to structure the bands correctly and consistently. |
So here is an idea which might work:
We have a similar pattern in OGC API - Tiles for multi-layer tilesets, supporting the selection of specific collections with the |
We could easily define an |
What if user requests |
@jratike80 If the format does not support returning bands at different resolutions, then yes the server should upsample bands B1 and B2 (we already do that in our implementation). I think it's actually less obvious what happens if the format does support multiple resolutions, and the client requests a particular resolution using |
SWG 2024-12-04:
|
In LANDSAT-8 the panchromatic band (8) is 15 meters/pixels, while most other bands are 30 meters/pixels.
It would be nice at the API level for clients to be able to infer this information, allowing to either request a coverage with different bands of different resolutions, if possible in the requested the data format, and/or requesting different bands individually at different resolutions.
This may trickle down as new CIS requirements / permissions / extensions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: