You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Following discussions in JSON-FG SWG, I realized some additional clarifications and fixes are needed in the GeoJSON-related req. classes as a follow-up to the changes made to reflect #46 (comment):
When JSON-FG is negotiated, the profiles returned need to be included in the links section, and optionally as HTTP Link: response headers
The default profile does not necessarily need to be plain GeoJSON if this representation is not available (e.g., for the static server use case)
We will need to register the various (4) DGGS-FG-JSON profiles with the naming authority (e.g., https://www.opengis.net/def/profile/ogc/0/jsonfg-dggs)
We may need to change all current references to FG-JSON to JSON-FG as I realized this is the short name used in the Standard, which does not follow the order in the title, potentially including our name for this DGGS-optimized vector encoding: DGGS-JSON-FG instead of DGGS-FG-JSON? (see the PS of my comment here)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Following discussions in JSON-FG SWG, I realized some additional clarifications and fixes are needed in the GeoJSON-related req. classes as a follow-up to the changes made to reflect #46 (comment):
links
section, and optionally as HTTPLink:
response headershttps://www.opengis.net/def/profile/ogc/0/jsonfg-dggs
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: