You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 1, 2024. It is now read-only.
Currently a FilterField is only allowed to return a BigDecimal, Date or List of Strings.
Actually the only requirement for a return type should be to implement Comparable.
An open question is: What if we want to support other FilterOperands than greater than, lower than or equals. E.g. it could be desirable to implement "startsWith". Should compareTo return 0 (equals) in the case of a match?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Sign up for freeto subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Currently a FilterField is only allowed to return a BigDecimal, Date or List of Strings.
Actually the only requirement for a return type should be to implement Comparable.
An open question is: What if we want to support other FilterOperands than greater than, lower than or equals. E.g. it could be desirable to implement "startsWith". Should compareTo return 0 (equals) in the case of a match?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: