-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update numerical methods #922
Conversation
91b543e
to
314518b
Compare
314518b
to
791f6e5
Compare
e361d8c
to
bea9cba
Compare
bea9cba
to
16d7915
Compare
There's a lot to review here. Would it be hard to cut this into separate PRs? The first one could just get code cleanup out of the way without the tests or the new tools. Or something like that. |
@Alex-Jordan I can do that. Would you like separate PRs. Or separate commits? I could split either way to 1) code cleanup and then 2) new functionality. |
BEGIN { | ||
be_strict(); | ||
} | ||
BEGIN { strict->import; } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is already on line 42 below. One of these needs to be removed.
PR #1022 now has this without any of the new code. I will close this one soon. |
closing in favor of #1022 |
This adds some functionality to the macro
PGnumericalmacros.pl
as well as includes a test suite for the macro. Also, cleaned up the code and improved the documentation.Can provide some problems if needed.