Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update numerical methods #922

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

pstaabp
Copy link
Member

@pstaabp pstaabp commented Aug 31, 2023

This adds some functionality to the macro PGnumericalmacros.pl as well as includes a test suite for the macro. Also, cleaned up the code and improved the documentation.

Can provide some problems if needed.

@pstaabp pstaabp force-pushed the update-numerical-methods branch 3 times, most recently from 91b543e to 314518b Compare August 31, 2023 12:03
@pstaabp pstaabp force-pushed the update-numerical-methods branch from 314518b to 791f6e5 Compare October 16, 2023 11:17
@pstaabp pstaabp force-pushed the update-numerical-methods branch 2 times, most recently from e361d8c to bea9cba Compare February 9, 2024 12:10
@pstaabp pstaabp force-pushed the update-numerical-methods branch from bea9cba to 16d7915 Compare February 9, 2024 12:21
@Alex-Jordan
Copy link
Contributor

There's a lot to review here. Would it be hard to cut this into separate PRs? The first one could just get code cleanup out of the way without the tests or the new tools. Or something like that.

@pstaabp
Copy link
Member Author

pstaabp commented Feb 13, 2024

@Alex-Jordan I can do that. Would you like separate PRs. Or separate commits? I could split either way to 1) code cleanup and then 2) new functionality.

BEGIN {
be_strict();
}
BEGIN { strict->import; }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is already on line 42 below. One of these needs to be removed.

@pstaabp
Copy link
Member Author

pstaabp commented Feb 20, 2024

PR #1022 now has this without any of the new code. I will close this one soon.

@pstaabp
Copy link
Member Author

pstaabp commented Mar 6, 2024

closing in favor of #1022

@pstaabp pstaabp closed this Mar 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants