Replies: 2 comments
-
Further, we could create views for each of the project areas (from https://github.com/oven-sh/bun#not-implemented-yet): The existing labels could use another level of categorization. E.g:
Could also be used to track parity with Node.js APIs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Actually try to add GitHub Milestones.. That would help alot. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
tldr: We should organize the roadmap better using Github projects and issue labels.
Problem
It's difficult to see an overview of the project for future users and new contributors.
Currently there are two big umbrella issues:
The problem with umbrella issues is they are not collaborative. As seen by people posting big lists of issues in the "Bun's priorities" issue.
I think most people want to know what is the list of missing features before I can run my favorite tool (next.js, cra, webpack, etc.) or library (chalk). New contributors will get involved because they want to push support for a certain tool over the line. Better project organization will help identify what needs to be done.
There are already a lot of issues being created for "Support X tool".
And this is already a stated goal:
Proposal
New label:
eco:<tool>
For important tools, we create a single umbrella issue e.g. "Support Next.js" labelled "ecosystem". This is for general discussion. It has the following content:
Any tasks related to this tool should be labelled with "eco:next.js" or "eco:next.js:v13".
Github project:
Bun Ecosystem
We then create a Github Project called "Bun Ecosystem", with a view for each tool filtering on these labels. We could use two views, one for those labelled with
bug
to collect all the bug submissions for triage, and another for tracking features.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions