We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We currently provision ports of type "internal" when simulating pods: https://github.com/dceara/ovn-heater/blob/d5ae548dceae639cfb956149742a8fe557b2e393/ovn-tester/ovn_utils.py#L25 https://github.com/dceara/ovn-heater/blob/d5ae548dceae639cfb956149742a8fe557b2e393/ovn-tester/ovn_workload.py#L300 https://github.com/dceara/ovn-heater/blob/d5ae548dceae639cfb956149742a8fe557b2e393/ovn-tester/ovn_workload.py#L313
Using veth instead would make configuration look closer to what ovn-kubernetes provisions.
This should probably be configurable (to allow side-by-side tests).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
numansiddique
No branches or pull requests
We currently provision ports of type "internal" when simulating pods:
https://github.com/dceara/ovn-heater/blob/d5ae548dceae639cfb956149742a8fe557b2e393/ovn-tester/ovn_utils.py#L25
https://github.com/dceara/ovn-heater/blob/d5ae548dceae639cfb956149742a8fe557b2e393/ovn-tester/ovn_workload.py#L300
https://github.com/dceara/ovn-heater/blob/d5ae548dceae639cfb956149742a8fe557b2e393/ovn-tester/ovn_workload.py#L313
Using veth instead would make configuration look closer to what ovn-kubernetes provisions.
This should probably be configurable (to allow side-by-side tests).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: