Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exceptions filtering for nested params #22

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kjin-
Copy link

@kjin- kjin- commented Sep 4, 2013

Params filtering currently only accepts flat hash, but I reckoned there are times when using the 'form_for' tag the values are submitted as a nested hash and wouldn't get filtered.

For e.g
{:account => { :password => 'secrets' }}, the password would still remain as plain text.

@dariocravero
Copy link

@kjin- thanks for the patch!.. Your concern is right. However I think that we should provide a recursive/deep filtering instead of a one level filtering. Would you mind refactoring to do so? /cc @padrino/core-members

@wikimatze
Copy link
Member

Puh, this issue is very old, @kjin- is this still an issue for you?

@adam12
Copy link
Contributor

adam12 commented Dec 2, 2016

Not related to the PR directly, but params leak out through the rack env anyways.

---Env:

rack.version: [1, 3]
rack.input: #<StringIO:0x007fbf28d3b780>
rack.errors: #<StringIO:0x007fbf28d3b820>
rack.multithread: true
rack.multiprocess: true
rack.run_once: false
REQUEST_METHOD: GET
SERVER_NAME: example.org
SERVER_PORT: 80
QUERY_STRING: account[email]=foo%40example.com&account[password]=super_secret&account[password_confirmation]=super_secret&account[user][password]=super_secret
PATH_INFO: /boom
rack.url_scheme: http
HTTPS: off
SCRIPT_NAME:
CONTENT_LENGTH: 0
rack.test: true
REMOTE_ADDR: 127.0.0.1
HTTP_HOST: example.org
HTTP_COOKIE:
rack.request.query_string: account[email]=foo%40example.com&account[password]=super_secret&account[password_confirmation]=super_secret&account[user][password]=super_secret
rack.request.query_hash: {"account"=>{"email"=>"[email protected]", "password"=>"super_secret", "password_confirmation"=>"super_secret", "user"=>{"password"=>"super_secret"}}}
sinatra.error: divided by 0

---Params:

"email" => "[email protected]"
"password" => [FILTERED]
"password_confirmation" => [FILTERED]
"password" => [FILTERED]
"splat" => []
"captures" => [#<ZeroDivisionError: divided by 0>]

So a recursive filter would be nice but likely not needed until we sanitized rack env.

Thoughts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants