From c5c40d02b3c1e027a37d32be4ecdf3a7b8a38fff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: rzadp Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 13:53:00 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Add RFC-5 --- text/0005-coretime-interface-test.md | 183 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 183 insertions(+) create mode 100644 text/0005-coretime-interface-test.md diff --git a/text/0005-coretime-interface-test.md b/text/0005-coretime-interface-test.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..47d9adc --- /dev/null +++ b/text/0005-coretime-interface-test.md @@ -0,0 +1,183 @@ +# RFC-5: Coretime Interface + +| | | +| --------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | +| **Start Date** | 06 July 2023 | +| **Description** | Interface for manipulating the usage of cores on the Polkadot Ubiquitous Computer. | +| **Authors** | Gavin Wood, Robert Habermeier | + + +## Summary + +In the Agile Coretime model of the Polkadot Ubiquitous Computer, as proposed in RFC-1 and RFC-3, it is necessary for the allocating parachain (envisioned to be one or more pallets on a specialised Brokerage System Chain) to communicate the core assignments to the Relay-chain, which is responsible for ensuring those assignments are properly enacted. + +This is a proposal for the interface which will exist around the Relay-chain in order to communicate this information and instructions. + +## Motivation + +The background motivation for this interface is splitting out coretime allocation functions and secondary markets from the Relay-chain onto System parachains. A well-understood and general interface is necessary for ensuring the Relay-chain receives coretime allocation instructions from one or more System chains without introducing dependencies on the implementation details of either side. + +## Requirements + +- The interface MUST allow the Relay-chain to be scheduled on a low-latency basis. +- Individual cores MUST be schedulable, both in full to a single task (a ParaId or the Instantaneous Coretime Pool) or to many unique tasks in differing ratios. +- Typical usage of the interface SHOULD NOT overload the VMP message system. +- The interface MUST allow for the allocating chain to be notified of all accounting information relevant for making accurate rewards for contributing to the Instantaneous Coretime Pool. +- The interface MUST allow for Instantaneous Coretime Market Credits to be communicated. +- The interface MUST allow for the allocating chain to instruct changes to the number of cores which it is able to allocate. +- The interface MUST allow for the allocating chain to be notified of changes to the number of cores which are able to be allocated by the allocating chain. + +## Stakeholders + +Primary stakeholder sets are: + +- Developers of the Relay-chain core-management logic. +- Developers of the Brokerage System Chain and its pallets. + +_Socialization:_ + +This content of this RFC was discussed in the Polkdot Fellows channel. + +## Explanation + +The interface has two sections: The messages which the Relay-chain is able to receive from the allocating parachain (the *UMP message types*), and messages which the Relay-chain is able to send to the allocating parachain (the *DMP message types*). These messages are expected to be able to be implemented in a well-known pallet and called with the XCM `Transact` instruction. + +Future work may include these messages being introduced into the XCM standard. + +### UMP Message Types + +#### `request_core_count` + +Prototype: + +``` +fn request_core_count( + count: u16, +) +``` + +Requests the Relay-chain to alter the number of schedulable cores to `count`. Under normal operation, the Relay-chain SHOULD send a `notify_core_count(count)` message back. + +#### `request_revenue_info_at` + +Prototype: + +``` +fn request_revenue_at( + when: BlockNumber, +) +``` + +Requests that the Relay-chain send a `notify_revenue` message back at or soon after Relay-chain block number `when` whose `until` parameter is equal to `when`. + +The period in to the past which `when` is allowed to be may be limited; if so the limit should be understood on a channel outside of this proposal. In the case that the request cannot be serviced because `when` is too old a block then a `notify_revenue` message must still be returned, but its `revenue` field may be `None`. + +#### `credit_account` + +Prototype: + +``` +fn credit_account( + who: AccountId, + amount: Balance, +) +``` + +Instructs the Relay-chain to add the `amount` of DOT to the Instantaneous Coretime Market Credit account of `who`. + +It is expected that Instantaneous Coretime Market Credit on the Relay-chain is NOT transferrable and only redeemable when used to assign cores in the Instantaneous Coretime Pool. + +#### `assign_core` + +Prototype: + +``` +type PartsOf57600 = u16; +enum CoreAssignment { + InstantaneousPool, + Task(ParaId), +} +fn assign_core( + core: CoreIndex, + begin: BlockNumber, + assignment: Vec<(CoreAssignment, PartsOf57600)>, + end_hint: Option, +) +``` + +Requirements: + +``` +assert!(core < core_count); +assert!(targets.iter().map(|x| x.0).is_sorted()); +assert_eq!(targets.iter().map(|x| x.0).unique().count(), targets.len()); +assert_eq!(targets.iter().map(|x| x.1).sum(), 57600); +``` + +Where: +- `core_count` is assumed to be the sole parameter in the last received `notify_core_count` message. + +Instructs the Relay-chain to ensure that the core indexed as `core` is utilised for a number of assignments in specific ratios given by `assignment` starting as soon after `begin` as possible. Core assignments take the form of a `CoreAssignment` value which can either task the core to a `ParaId` value or indicate that the core should be used in the Instantaneous Pool. Each assignment comes with a ratio value, represented as the numerator of the fraction with a denominator of 57,600. + +If `end_hint` is `Some` and the inner is greater than the current block number, then the Relay-chain should optimize in the expectation of receiving a new `assign_core(core, ...)` message at or prior to the block number of the inner value. Specific functionality should remain unchanged regardless of the `end_hint` value. + +On the choice of denominator: 57,600 is a very composite number which factors into: 2 ** 8, 3 ** 2, 5 ** 2. By using it as the denominator we allow for various useful fractions to be perfectly represented including thirds, quarters, fifths, tenths, 80ths, percent and 256ths. + +### DMP Message Types + +#### `notify_core_count` + +Prototype: + +``` +fn notify_core_count( + count: u16, +) +``` + +Indicate that from this block onwards, the range of acceptable values of the `core` parameter of `assign_core` message is `[0, count)`. `assign_core` will be a no-op if provided with a value for `core` outside of this range. + +#### `notify_revenue_info` + +Prototype: + +``` +fn notify_revenue_info( + until: BlockNumber, + revenue: Option, +) +``` + +Provide the amount of revenue accumulated from Instantaneous Coretime Sales from Relay-chain block number `last_until` to `until`, not including `until` itself. `last_until` is defined as being the `until` argument of the last `notify_revenue` message sent, or zero for the first call. If `revenue` is `None`, this indicates that the information is no longer available. + +This explicitly disregards the possibility of multiple parachains requesting and being notified of revenue information. The Relay-chain must be configured to ensure that only a single revenue information destination exists. + +### Realistic Limits of the Usage + +For `request_revenue_info`, a successful request should be possible if `when` is no less than the Relay-chain block number on arrival of the message less 100,000. + +For `assign_core`, a successful request should be possible if `begin` is no less than the Relay-chain block number on arrival of the message plus 10 and `workload` contains no more than 100 items. + +## Performance, Ergonomics and Compatibility + +No specific considerations. + +## Testing, Security and Privacy + +Standard Polkadot testing and security auditing applies. + +The proposal introduces no new privacy concerns. + +## Future Directions and Related Material + +RFC-1 proposes a means of determining allocation of Coretime using this interface. + +RFC-3 proposes a means of implementing the high-level allocations within the Relay-chain. + +## Drawbacks, Alternatives and Unknowns + +None at present. + +## Prior Art and References + +None.