Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Future development suggestions #8

Open
RCHowell opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Future development suggestions #8

RCHowell opened this issue Nov 27, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@RCHowell
Copy link
Member

RCHowell commented Nov 27, 2024

While porting the initial generator work, I've realized this has become comically complicated. Here are some suggestions for future me or future others which have been on my mind.

  • This is suffering from the inner-platform effect, reduce anodizer complexity
  • We could drop the anodizer model/parser and all that since smithy is our frontend.
  • Keep the filesystem and template abstractions as those are very useful.
  • The options are likely not needed.
  • Serde for smithy (and smithy-aws) builtins needs a solution.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant