Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add ability to retrieve text from CTS URN to use as the body of the annotation #45

Open
balmas opened this issue Sep 21, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@balmas
Copy link
Contributor

balmas commented Sep 21, 2016

For the characterizations, I think we are going to need the ability for the user to enter the text along with the CTS URN/URI of the text in which it occurs. This is because we don't have a nice easy way for them to select that from the source text right now and get it automatically calculated for them as a text selector. (i.e. they'll want an annotation body which is "some descriptive text" from http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0012.tlg001.perseus-grc1:1.1 ) where "some descriptive text" is expressed as a TextSelector.

@balmas balmas changed the title add ability to supply text manually to an annotation add ability to retrieve text from CTS URN to use as the body of the annotation Jan 18, 2017
@balmas
Copy link
Contributor Author

balmas commented Jan 18, 2017

revisiting this, what we would like is the ability to have a typeahead (as in the sparrow code used for the treebank input form in perseids-clinet-apps) where user find the primary source by typing it, and then the cts api used to retrieve the text, display for the user to select, and then the urn + selector created by Plokamos in the annotation body

@balmas
Copy link
Contributor Author

balmas commented Jan 18, 2017

but of course we need a way to still create these annotations manually (as described initially) if the primary source isn't available on our cts endpoint

@balmas balmas modified the milestones: 0.4.0: work on Selector system, 0.3.0: adding ontologies and text entry Jan 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant