-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Why do you use custom version type? #4
Comments
I agree that the FCL |
Is there something that MigrationVersion doesn't do that you need it to? On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Ryan Ohs [email protected] wrote:
|
I've made some changes in the following pull request: #5 And while looking through project I found that exists May be after review of this changes you can publish a new version in the nuget? |
Can we split these out into separate commits, changing Version isn't a On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Dmitry Tretyakov <[email protected]
|
Our concern: I'll split pull request in two parts. If you worry about backward compatibility then both of |
So you can look at the following:
|
Awesome, that seems reasonable to me for 4 numbers On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:41 PM, Dmitry Tretyakov <[email protected]
|
And FWIW I think this library's approach to migrations was a good starting On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Wes McClure [email protected] wrote:
|
Great, we're looking forward to look at the new migration toolkit. |
Hey I'm just curious, what do you use 4 numbers for that can't be accomplished with 3? |
We're using migration version associated with a complete product version. |
Hi, in FCL exists
Version
class: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.version.aspxCould you explain why do use use custom
MigrationVersion
type?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: