You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When collecting feedback from an engineer's PM or LL, the set of relevant questions are often spread across several skill areas, and may not be immediately discoverable.
Alternately, there are some skill definitions that are rarely observable by anyone other than a Pivot's manager.
Possible solution
One benefit of the new yaml format (#23) is that individual skills may be annotated with additional metadata.
For example, right now we've got
- id: sb975bf39description: >- Is aligned with the priorities of the organization, and approaches their team allocation as a collaborative effort with leadership.area: alignmentlevel: p4
but we could easily add new, optional key: value pairs that encode other useful information.
For example:
- id: sb975bf39
description: >-
Is aligned with the priorities of the organization, and approaches their team allocation as a
collaborative effort with leadership.
area: alignment
level: p4
+ observable_by: [manager, LL]
Another example:
- id: s5c7c3275
description: "Pairs with PM+Design on technical solutioning (eg: in pre-IPM, preparing for inception, etc.)"
area: project-leadership
level: p2
+ observable_by: [PM, anchor]
We could easily provide "filtered" views of the skills that would help with "what questions should I ask their LL?"
Problem
When collecting feedback from an engineer's PM or LL, the set of relevant questions are often spread across several skill areas, and may not be immediately discoverable.
Alternately, there are some skill definitions that are rarely observable by anyone other than a Pivot's manager.
Possible solution
One benefit of the new yaml format (#23) is that individual skills may be annotated with additional metadata.
For example, right now we've got
but we could easily add new, optional
key: value
pairs that encode other useful information.For example:
- id: sb975bf39 description: >- Is aligned with the priorities of the organization, and approaches their team allocation as a collaborative effort with leadership. area: alignment level: p4 + observable_by: [manager, LL]
Another example:
- id: s5c7c3275 description: "Pairs with PM+Design on technical solutioning (eg: in pre-IPM, preparing for inception, etc.)" area: project-leadership level: p2 + observable_by: [PM, anchor]
We could easily provide "filtered" views of the skills that would help with "what questions should I ask their LL?"
Thanks to @dsabeti for the idea!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: