Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

9c-main: introduce a new headless to check lib9c development branch's state transition logic backward-compatibility #352

Open
1 of 5 tasks
moreal opened this issue May 20, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@moreal
Copy link
Contributor

moreal commented May 20, 2023

Description

This issue suggests introducing a new headless which uses the RemoteActionEvaluator feature, to check the lib9c development branch's state transition logic backward compatibility.

Now, lib9c includes all state transition logics (i.e., IAction) in one Assembly so the lib9c development branch must always guarantee its backward compatibility.

And 9c-headless started to support the RemoteActionEvaluator feature. It separates action evaluation logic as a web service from the 9c-headless process. it means it can independently update only the action evaluation logic, without a 9c-headless image bump. It is the point to suggest. Run a new headless with RemoteActionEvaluator and a lib9c-stateservice, then upgrade lib9c-stateservice image periodically to the lib9c repository development branch's latest Docker build. Because the lib9c-stateservice is a stateless web service, I expect it can be upgraded smoothly as other web services do.

Plan (maybe)

@moreal moreal self-assigned this May 23, 2023
@moreal moreal moved this to In Progress in Nine Chronicles DX Team May 23, 2023
@moreal moreal moved this from In Progress to Todo in Nine Chronicles DX Team May 24, 2023
@moreal moreal moved this from Todo to In Progress in Nine Chronicles DX Team May 24, 2023
@moreal moreal moved this from In Progress to Todo in Nine Chronicles DX Team May 25, 2023
@moreal moreal removed their assignment May 25, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant