Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Makefile targets dependencies #1362

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

Danielius1922
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes introduce significant enhancements to the configuration and documentation of various components within the project. Key updates include the addition of expected memory usage parameters in GitHub Actions, streamlined cleanup targets in the Makefile, and improved API documentation for the device provisioning service. These modifications aim to refine testing accuracy, enhance resource management, and clarify service configurations for better usability and maintainability.

Changes

Files Change Summary
.github/workflows/measureMemory.yml Added expectedRssInMb for memory usage validation and updated test execution commands.
Makefile Introduced new clean targets for better resource management and restructured MongoDB run commands.
charts/plgd-hub/README.md Enhanced device provisioning service documentation with new configuration parameters and UI updates.
device-provisioning-service/README.md Updated API docs with new Swagger URL and restructured HTTP authorization properties for clarity.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Makefile
    participant Device Provisioning Service

    User->>GitHub Actions: Trigger Workflow
    GitHub Actions->>Makefile: Execute Tests
    Makefile->>GitHub Actions: Clean Resources
    GitHub Actions->>Device Provisioning Service: Validate API
    Device Provisioning Service-->>GitHub Actions: Return Results
    GitHub Actions-->>User: Workflow Complete
Loading

🐰 Hop along the path of code,
With memory checks, our tests have glowed!
Clean targets and docs in bright display,
Improving our project, hip-hip-hooray!
A burrow of changes, all tidy and neat,
For our coding garden, a joyful feat! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 force-pushed the adam/hotfix/fix-memory-tests branch from 5b7062b to 6b0696b Compare August 19, 2024 13:34
@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 force-pushed the adam/hotfix/fix-memory-tests branch from 6b0696b to 241b873 Compare August 19, 2024 14:04
@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 marked this pull request as ready for review August 19, 2024 16:39
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5158a02 and 453ec22.

Files selected for processing (4)
  • .github/workflows/measureMemory.yml (4 hunks)
  • Makefile (11 hunks)
  • charts/plgd-hub/README.md (3 hunks)
  • device-provisioning-service/README.md (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (16)
.github/workflows/measureMemory.yml (5)

73-73: LGTM!

The expectedRssInMb parameter is set to 50 MB for 1 device and 1 resource, which seems appropriate.


124-124: LGTM!

The expectedRssInMb parameter is set to 145 MB for 1000 devices and 1 resource, which is a reasonable expectation.


173-173: LGTM!

The expectedRssInMb parameter is set to 210 MB for 2500 devices and 1 resource, aligning with expected scaling.


222-222: LGTM!

The expectedRssInMb parameter is set to 320 MB for 5000 devices and 1 resource, which is reasonable given the configuration.


337-344: LGTM!

The integration of TEST_MEMORY_COAP_GATEWAY_EXPECTED_RSS_IN_MB into the testing command is well-structured and enhances memory validation.

device-provisioning-service/README.md (2)

57-57: Verify the new Swagger URL.

The Swagger URL has been updated to point to a new location. Ensure that the new URL is correct and accessible.

Verification successful

Swagger URL is accessible and correct.

The new Swagger URL in the README is accessible and returns a status code of 200, indicating that the resource is available at the specified location. No further action is required.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the accessibility of the new Swagger URL.

# Test: Check if the new URL is accessible. Expect: HTTP status 200.
curl -o /dev/null -s -w "%{http_code}\n" https://raw.githubusercontent.com/plgd-dev/hub/main/device-provisioning-service/pb/service.swagger.json

Length of output: 150


69-78: LGTM! Verify the new HTTP authorization structure.

The restructuring of HTTP authorization properties into an endpoints[] array is logical and improves organization. Ensure that the configuration is correctly applied in the codebase.

Verification successful

The new HTTP authorization structure is correctly applied and documented.

The apis.http.authorization.endpoints structure is used in both the README.md and the bundle/run.sh script, confirming its integration into the codebase. The script manipulates this structure, indicating its active use in configuration processes.

  • Files Involved:
    • device-provisioning-service/README.md
    • bundle/run.sh
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the usage of the new HTTP authorization structure in the codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `apis.http.authorization.endpoints` in the codebase. Expect: Consistent and correct usage.
rg --type yaml --type markdown 'apis\.http\.authorization\.endpoints'

Length of output: 2269


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for the usage of the new HTTP authorization structure in the entire codebase.

# Test: Search for the usage of `apis.http.authorization.endpoints` across all file types in the codebase.
rg 'apis\.http\.authorization\.endpoints'

Length of output: 3435

Makefile (7)

94-96: LGTM! Verify the effectiveness of certificates/clean.

The certificates/clean target is well-implemented. Ensure it effectively removes all related files.


105-107: LGTM! Verify the effectiveness of privateKeys/clean.

The privateKeys/clean target is correctly implemented. Ensure it effectively removes all related files.


130-134: LGTM! Verify the effectiveness of nats/clean.

The nats/clean target is appropriately implemented. Ensure it effectively removes all related files and containers.


241-251: LGTM! Verify the effectiveness of mongo/clean.

The mongo/clean target is properly implemented. Ensure it effectively removes all related files and containers.


268-270: LGTM! Verify the effectiveness of http-gateway-www/clean.

The http-gateway-www/clean target is well-implemented. Ensure it effectively removes all related files.


97-97: LGTM!

The update to .PHONY declarations correctly includes the new clean targets, ensuring they are recognized as phony.


444-445: LGTM!

The enhancements to the env and env/test/mem targets improve environment setup flexibility and specificity.

charts/plgd-hub/README.md (2)

308-311: Ensure clarity and completeness in parameter descriptions.

The deviceProvisioningService section introduces new parameters. Ensure that each parameter is clearly described, including its type, default value, and purpose. This will help users understand how to configure the device provisioning service effectively.

Verification successful

Clarity and Completeness in Parameter Descriptions Verified

The deviceProvisioningService section in the charts/plgd-hub/README.md file provides clear and comprehensive descriptions for each parameter, including their types, default values, and purposes. This documentation will effectively guide users in configuring the device provisioning service.

  • The parameters are well-documented, ensuring users understand how to use and configure them.
  • Links to further documentation are provided for more detailed configuration guidance.

No further action is required regarding the clarity and completeness of these parameter descriptions.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that each parameter in `deviceProvisioningService` is clearly described.

# Test: Search for the `deviceProvisioningService` section and check for descriptions.
rg --type markdown -A 5 'deviceProvisioningService' charts/plgd-hub/README.md

Length of output: 15111


617-617: Verify the accuracy of UI visibility settings.

The httpgateway.ui section updates visibility settings. Ensure that the documentation accurately reflects these changes and provides clear instructions on how to configure the UI.

Verification successful

UI Visibility Settings Documented Accurately

The httpgateway.ui section in the README accurately reflects the visibility settings for the main sidebar. The documentation provides clear configuration details and includes a link to the complete http-gateway service configuration. No further changes are needed.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the accuracy of the `httpgateway.ui` visibility settings.

# Test: Search for the `httpgateway.ui` section and check for the visibility settings.
rg --type markdown -A 5 'httpgateway.ui' charts/plgd-hub/README.md

Length of output: 3304

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 19, 2024

@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 merged commit 892d77f into main Aug 20, 2024
82 checks passed
@Danielius1922 Danielius1922 deleted the adam/hotfix/fix-memory-tests branch August 20, 2024 07:27
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Sep 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant