-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Clean-up stale packages one by one #1367
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new required input parameter, Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
5d0209d
to
60f7372
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/actions/cleanup-stale/action.yaml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ghcr-cleanup.yaml (3 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (8)
.github/actions/cleanup-stale/action.yaml (4)
6-8
: LGTM!The new required input parameter
package_name
is correctly defined.
29-29
: LGTM!The
image-names
parameter is correctly modified to use the newpackage_name
input.
58-58
: LGTM!The
package_name
parameter is correctly added to thedelete-untagged-ghcr-action
action.
Line range hint
1-60
: LGTM!The changes are correctly implemented and consistent with the introduction of the new
package_name
input parameter. The AI-generated summary accurately describes the changes..github/workflows/ghcr-cleanup.yaml (4)
55-77
: LGTM!The matrix strategy is correctly defined and includes a comprehensive list of package names. The
fail-fast: false
setting is appropriate to ensure that the workflow continues to run even if one of the jobs fails.
87-87
: LGTM!The usage of the
package_name
matrix variable is correct and ensures that the correct package name is passed to the cleanup action.
93-93
: LGTM!The usage of the
package_name
matrix variable is correct and ensures that the correct package name is passed to the cleanup action.
102-102
: LGTM!The usage of the
package_name
matrix variable is correct and ensures that the correct package name is passed to the cleanup action.
60f7372
to
8b587d6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- .github/actions/cleanup-stale/action.yaml (3 hunks)
- .github/workflows/ghcr-cleanup.yaml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- .github/actions/cleanup-stale/action.yaml
- .github/workflows/ghcr-cleanup.yaml
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
No description provided.