Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

As a user, I can build flatpak images from source #1418

Closed
lubosmj opened this issue Nov 9, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

As a user, I can build flatpak images from source #1418

lubosmj opened this issue Nov 9, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@lubosmj
Copy link
Member

lubosmj commented Nov 9, 2023

https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/first-build.html

Users will be able to upload a blueprint based on which the image could be built and served afterwards.

@ipanova
Copy link
Member

ipanova commented Feb 14, 2024

flatpak-builder does not seem to be a standard container tool. What is the rationale for container registry integration with flatpack builder?

@lubosmj
Copy link
Member Author

lubosmj commented Feb 14, 2024

That was just an idea since we already support building container images in-house. We might use the builder to create an OCI image from a flatpak blueprint and then host it in the Pulp Registry, see https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/flatpak-command-reference.html#flatpak-build-bundle.

I think we can agree on this not being a priority at the moment.

@lubosmj lubosmj closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Feb 14, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Not Started to Done in Pulp Container Roadmap Feb 14, 2024
@pulpbot pulpbot moved this to Done in RH Pulp Kanban board Feb 14, 2024
@ipanova
Copy link
Member

ipanova commented Feb 14, 2024

I see what you mean. That would require a separate build endpoint specifically for building flatpak images because of the underlying builder. If only builah could do this, I would not be against extending out oci image builder feature to accept some new params like flatpak blueprints, but since this is not the case we should weigh whether this is something we want to generally add to the registry capabilities.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants