-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improving integration of quantum_info
module and qibojit
#1136
Comments
quantum_info
module and numba
quantum_info
module and qibojit
@AlejandroSopena @BrunoLiegiBastonLiegi This is list of the functions that have priority in being optimized in Basis:
Random ensembles:
Superoperator transformations:
|
@renatomello should we create a separate module in
and then the functions inside the |
Which routines would be there? |
All the ones we want to improve with |
Then they'd have to be subroutines of the functions we have, because the functions we want to improve are all user-facing and part of specific submodules |
#1459 is trying to address the first two boxes (basis section) |
Right now, even though the
quantum_info
module is compatible to all backends, it is not making use of any of thejit
properties fromnumba
. Therefore,numpy
andnumba
performances are the same across the board. It would be good to profile the module and see where it is worth to invest time to code custom operations inqibojit
.Tasks
CliffordOperations
throughnumba
andcupy
qibojit#161qibojit
engines #1150qibo.quantum_info.basis.pauli_basis
andvectorization
function #1459The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: