From 2175efefe92ed44d0bdd26ed6177035e2595ea44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gabriele Palazzo <73099233+GabrielePalazzo@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 11:06:46 +0400 Subject: [PATCH] Typo Co-authored-by: Edoardo Pedicillo --- doc/source/protocols/resonator_spectroscopy.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/source/protocols/resonator_spectroscopy.rst b/doc/source/protocols/resonator_spectroscopy.rst index 9e72ca770..1b7da46c8 100644 --- a/doc/source/protocols/resonator_spectroscopy.rst +++ b/doc/source/protocols/resonator_spectroscopy.rst @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ elements to take into consideration: * higher amplitudes usually correspond to better signal to noise ratio; * at high amplitudes the signal breaks superconductivity, therefore resonator is not effectively not coupled to the qubit (we talk of bare resonator frequency); * at intermediate amplitudes the peak could completely disappear and is, in general, not Lorentzian; -* very high amplitudes could damage the components3 +* very high amplitudes could damage the components. The bare resonator frequency can be found setting a large value for the amplitude, e.g.: