You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
So, why is it referencing this old 23ddd9b commit instead of the master? And would it make sense to change it so that the master branch of the qwat/QWAT repo' makes use of the master branch of the data model repository?
What would be the way of using the master version of the data model? git submodule update --init --recursive doesn't seem to upgrade it to its latest version. Instead, after cloning the main qwat/QWAT repo', this command switches the data model folder to that 23ddd9b old commit, which is in a DETACHED state (this is definitely not a good practice?)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
I have a naive question, but when cloning the main qwat/QWAT repo', the folder of the data model in that repository looks like this at the moment of writing:
and points to an old commit which is not referenced as a branch: https://github.com/qwat/qwat-data-model/tree/23ddd9bed3501fdaba6eaf9764cd9963116f1b4e
Instead, I would "naturally" expect the data model folder to also reference the master branch of the qwat/qwat-data-model repository, namely this one: https://github.com/qwat/qwat-data-model/tree/master
So, why is it referencing this old
23ddd9b
commit instead of themaster
? And would it make sense to change it so that themaster
branch of the qwat/QWAT repo' makes use of themaster
branch of the data model repository?What would be the way of using the master version of the data model?
git submodule update --init --recursive
doesn't seem to upgrade it to its latest version. Instead, after cloning the main qwat/QWAT repo', this command switches the data model folder to that23ddd9b
old commit, which is in a DETACHED state (this is definitely not a good practice?)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: