-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
expect_null_linter #887
expect_null_linter #887
Conversation
R/google_linters.R
Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
#' @title Linters for the Google extension to the tidyverse style guide | |||
#' | |||
#' Google uses a fork of the tidyverse style guide, pursuant to which |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cc @michaelquinn32 for copy here & in NEWS
Patch coverage drop is from |
@AshesITR are we ready to start the stream of google linters now? if so I'll rebase this to the doc changes and start from here |
I'm immediately seeing the benefit of #916... a bit hard to know if I've integrated this new linter with the new approach correctly (IIUC the main thing is to be sure to add the linter+tags to the inst/lintr/linters.csv file?) |
Looks good. One last thing necessary for new tags is creating a documentation for them in |
LGTM without the dep on |
Part of #884
Hits
expect_equal(x, NULL)
, which should beexpect_null(x)