Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix return types for MurmurHash3_x86_32 template specializations #17622

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: branch-25.02
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

davidwendt
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Changes the return types for the MurmurHash3_x86_32 specialization functions to match the declarations in the struct.
Hoping to fix some intellisense squiggles.

Checklist

  • I am familiar with the Contributing Guidelines.
  • New or existing tests cover these changes.
  • The documentation is up to date with these changes.

@davidwendt davidwendt added 3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team libcudf Affects libcudf (C++/CUDA) code. improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function non-breaking Non-breaking change labels Dec 18, 2024
@davidwendt davidwendt self-assigned this Dec 18, 2024
@davidwendt davidwendt requested a review from a team as a code owner December 18, 2024 14:50
Copy link
Contributor

@kingcrimsontianyu kingcrimsontianyu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm!

Copy link
Member

@PointKernel PointKernel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Probably need to do the same for other hashers as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3 - Ready for Review Ready for review by team improvement Improvement / enhancement to an existing function libcudf Affects libcudf (C++/CUDA) code. non-breaking Non-breaking change
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants