-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 133
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Minor parameter adjustments to process-based dri-eaf steel route #1885
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Minor parameter adjustments to process-based dri-eaf steel route #1885
Conversation
@@ -604,18 +604,23 @@ $ifthen.cm_subsec_model_steel "%cm_subsec_model_steel%" == "processes" | |||
!! carbon capture mass is given in tCO2 and converted to tC after that | |||
|
|||
!! reduction: 504 m^3; heat 242 m^3; conversion: x / 11.126 m^3/kg * 0.0333 MWh/kg | |||
p37_specFeDemTarget("feh2s","idr","h2") = 2.23 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Rechberger et al 2020, Section 4.2 (per tDRI) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please also update the comment in the line above, i.e. how you changed the calculation?
Where did you find the differing value?
p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","pri") = 0.87 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Vogl et al 2018, Section 3.1 and IEAGHG 2013, Vol 1 Section D Table D-13 and D-15 | ||
p37_specFeDemTarget("feels","eaf","sec") = 0.79 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / Vogl et al 2018, Section 3.1 and IEAGHG 2013, Vol 1 Section D Table D-13 and D-15 | ||
|
||
p37_specFeDemTarget("fegas","eaf","pri") = 0.47 / (sm_TWa_2_MWh/sm_giga_2_non); !! Source: POSTED / IEA GHG 2013, Vol 1 Section D Table D-13 and D-15 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This creates un-capturable NG-emissions for all DRI (also H2) in this form. Okay for the paper, but maybe let's put C&R into a separate process before we merge it to develop?
I may have said something else in the past, but it seems like a bad idea now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sounds good. Should we leave this PR open until we add C&R ?
is this PR also relevant for our next release? Will it be merged soon? |
no |
Purpose of this PR
I made some corrections to dri-eaf parameters in process-based steel based on POSTED literature, and also added the additional electricity and heat demand for casting and rolling to eaf (this was already included in the bf-bof route).
Type of change
(Make sure to delete from the Type-of-change list the items not relevant to your PR)
Checklist:
remind2
where it was neededforbiddenColumnNames
in readCheckScenarioConfig.R in case the PR leads to deprecated switchesFAIL 0
in the output ofmake test
)CHANGELOG.md
has been updated correctlyChanges to process-based steel:
Uptake of DRI-NG / DRI-NG-CCS is reduced and replaced by a larger uptake of H2-DRI, and some small amount of BF-BOF-CCS (especially in MEA).