You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In your results table, there is a significant difference between the per-time-point classification accuracies of the Activity dataset, for the different RNN and ODE methods, compared to the results presented in the Latent-ODE paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.03907.pdf). For instance, you mention an Acc of 88.5% of ODE-RNN while 82.9% is mentioned in the original paper. Is there any difference in the experimental setup/metrics you follow? thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In your results table, there is a significant difference between the per-time-point classification accuracies of the Activity dataset, for the different RNN and ODE methods, compared to the results presented in the Latent-ODE paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/1907.03907.pdf). For instance, you mention an Acc of 88.5% of ODE-RNN while 82.9% is mentioned in the original paper. Is there any difference in the experimental setup/metrics you follow? thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: